bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
greekman
- 03 Apr 2008 10:50
- 26336 of 27111
That's the big difference between the UK and USA in the business world.
We tend to reward failure, the USA reward success.
hewittalan6
- 03 Apr 2008 11:01
- 26337 of 27111
Yep,
They've been rewarding a slow progression towards bankruptcy for 25 years.
At least we do it a bit quicker.
oblomov
- 03 Apr 2008 13:00
- 26338 of 27111
Termination should mean Termination.
He might have performed better if it had! Or am I being a tad harsh?
kimoldfield
- 03 Apr 2008 13:21
- 26339 of 27111
Wagner WAS the Terminator wasn't he? "I vill not hurt you, just your bank balance"
hangon
- 03 Apr 2008 16:22
- 26340 of 27111
Anyone going to the AGM, or will it be held in a lift, somewhere in Siberia?
kimoldfield
- 03 Apr 2008 16:42
- 26341 of 27111
Well, if it's in a lift then at least we can be assured that, at some point, SEO will be going up.................and we all know what happens after that!
halifax
- 03 Apr 2008 17:23
- 26342 of 27111
More likely to be held in a large plastic(bio-degradable) bag.Dont hold your breath!
required field
- 03 Apr 2008 22:37
- 26343 of 27111
Please don't get me wrong as I 'm trying not to knock SEO anymore...(well...I'll try anyway !)...but I often come across old plastic bags in the garden at times and these things are possibly no more than 2 years old and they are in tatters, I mean they are disintegrating into pieces....what's this business about plastic bags lasting 100 years... they must be really tough....I have yet to come across anything plastic that's going to last a century.
oblomov
- 03 Apr 2008 22:57
- 26344 of 27111
They all break up to a certain extent - but not completely. The size of the pieces you see are probably the full extent they are going to disintegrate to for a very long time. The small pieces scatter but dont break down. They can themselves into water and pollute that.
Bio-degradable bags are not much better - they just break up into smaller pieces quicker.
Compostable bags completely break down - under the right conditions.
oblomov
- 03 Apr 2008 22:57
- 26345 of 27111
They all break up to a certain extent - but not completely. The size of the pieces you see are probably the full extent they are going to disintegrate to for a very long time. The small pieces scatter but dont break down. They can enter into water supplies and pollute that.
Bio-degradable bags are not much better - they just break up into smaller pieces quicker.
Compostable bags completely break down - under the right conditions.
greekman
- 04 Apr 2008 07:58
- 26346 of 27111
Also they take far longer to break down in landfill when they are buried away from the air. This is where the 100 years breakdown timescale comes from when they are protected from the elements. Also as these plastic bags degrade the poisons they contain mix with the soil. Bio-degradable bags eliminate all these problems.
required field
- 04 Apr 2008 08:07
- 26347 of 27111
Thanks for the info lads !
Mad Pad
- 04 Apr 2008 08:20
- 26348 of 27111
Oblo you got it wrong(I think),it's "degradeable "bags that breakdown into to small pieces.They are made from petroplastics with an additive that helps them breakdown.I will be at the AGM,dont want to miss the next episode!
greekman
- 04 Apr 2008 08:27
- 26349 of 27111
Both degradable and bio-degradable break down and as they do both types split it's smaller pieces. They main difference is that the bio type have far less effect on the environment than the degradable. It could be argued that the petroplastic bag does degrade, the problem being the huge time scale. Even plastic bottles degrade over time.
Madpad,
Too far away re the AGM to attend so will look forward to any reports from attendees.
oblomov
- 04 Apr 2008 08:42
- 26350 of 27111
Point taken, Mad and greek - I meant that, aside from compostable, they don't break down completely, even the biodegradable ones. Or at least, not for a long time, greek says.
tweenie
- 11 Apr 2008 21:36
- 26351 of 27111
A week without a post.
Could'nt resist.
Nothing to see here..............move along.
:-)
moneyplus
- 12 Apr 2008 12:34
- 26352 of 27111
Anyone noticed with all the latest publicity about marine pollution and plastic litter how often the articles mention cigarette butts as a major part of the problem----what happened to the seo solution??
greekman
- 12 Apr 2008 16:33
- 26353 of 27111
Yes the cig butt problem has been in the media regularly for some months now. I also have wondered what has been the final decision by SEO re this. Have they just disregarded the issue as a total loss or what. Would be nice to know or are SEO still treating us like the proverbial mushroom.
oblomov
- 12 Apr 2008 17:07
- 26354 of 27111
From the 2006 annual report:-
'We continue to develop the starch cigarette filter technology and will provide an update when the filtration
trials have reached a more advanced stage.'
No mention in the 2007 report.
greekman
- 12 Apr 2008 17:51
- 26355 of 27111
Hi Oblomov,
I do see to remember a later update when they mentioned a previously proposed interest to sell the technology was disbanded but I can't find such a report. Perhaps someone has kept better records than I have and can clarify.