goldfinger
- 09 Jun 2005 12:25
Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).
Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.
cheers GF.
Fred1new
- 23 Jun 2013 19:34
- 26358 of 81564
Cynic,
If you managed to read the previous, another and perhaps more pertinent article by Andrew Rawnsley is :-
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/jun/23/tories-alternative-queens-speech
He is quite amusing, but very observant of weaknesses.
-----------
cynic
- 23 Jun 2013 19:37
- 26359 of 81564
you do not answer my question above .... i may not bother to read articles, but single sentences i can usually manage .... so try again fred .... what party do you think has a viable alternative to the present crew?
Fred1new
- 23 Jun 2013 19:50
- 26360 of 81564
Dreams,
If you contain your postings to argument rather puerile attempts at personal abuse, I will attempt to do the same.
Disagreeing with me, or being me being proved wrong, does not aggrieve, but silly abuse often irritates me.
Hence my responses.
-------------------------
Cynic,
Read back and you will read suggestions I have made for the direction of stimuli for the UK economy for the last three years.
Belatedly, Porky is probably going to do so. The cost of which due to probable interest rises in the near future will be greater.
---------------
PS.
Unlike me, it seems to me you afford more importance and influence of my vote than I do.
But would suggest a check up, your memory seems to be fading.
cynic
- 23 Jun 2013 20:01
- 26361 of 81564
fred - i suggest you tell us all - for we all hang on your every pearl - which party you currently think has a viable economic alternative to the present .... your current wiffle-waffle implies that your answer will be "NONE!"
hilary
- 23 Jun 2013 20:03
- 26362 of 81564
Actually, if the two clowns who wrote the Grauniad articles referred to by Old Bollock Chops in posts 26357 and 26362 above had bothered to do their homework properly (instead of relying upon the bog-standard socialist rhetoric), they would be well aware that the standard measure of social inequality (the Gini Coefficient) produces results concluding that inequality is at its lowest at the end of a recession (ie. right now), and at its highest at the end of a boom (ie. around the time Blair quit, and well before Gordon the Moron lost the last election).
Despite their reputation to the contrary, it looks like the Bullingdon Boys are actually doing a very good job of caring for the more vulnerable in society!
Fred,
If you're gonna spout crap, please try to ensure that it's factually accurate crap!
Fred1new
- 23 Jun 2013 20:19
- 26363 of 81564
Cynic
Read the article by Rawnsley, interesting exposure of tory party politics.
----------------
Lady Godiva has been revived.
Shame.
dreamcatcher
- 23 Jun 2013 20:20
- 26364 of 81564
Being serious Fred, are you just playing a wind up game on here. I have been here for about two years. Nearly every posting by you runs out and makes fun of David C or the conservative party. Yes. So would it not be rather strange for you to vote the cons ? I think certainly yes. You never put up a comic picture against the labour party or to me disagree with their objectives. So to me you come across as a strong labour supporter. So with the cons appearing to wind you up all the time, what stops you from walking to the pole station and putting a cross against any other party other than the cons, when they get up your nose, so to speak.
cynic
- 23 Jun 2013 20:29
- 26365 of 81564
fred - you clearly need your own political party, as just like a politician, you refuse to answer a simple question ..... frightfully dull of you, but as is so often so, i listen for what is not said
dreamcatcher
- 23 Jun 2013 20:43
- 26366 of 81564
Labour clearly have a lot of work to be done as a poll showed just 30 per cent of voters think Labour can be trusted with the economy. I would love another party to come along and improve on the Conservatives, there does not seem to me a better party at the moment. The labour party needs fresh blood.
Fred1new
- 23 Jun 2013 21:06
- 26367 of 81564
Dreams,
It is called ballance.
=
Manuel,
What question?
===
dreamcatcher
- 23 Jun 2013 21:16
- 26368 of 81564
"Bollocks" /ˈbɒləks/ is a word of Anglo-Saxon origin, meaning "testicles". The word is often used figuratively in British English and Hiberno-English, as a noun to mean "nonsense", an expletive following a minor accident or misfortune, or an adjective to mean "poor quality" or "useless". Similarly, the common phrases "Bollocks to this!" or "That's a load of old bollocks" generally indicate contempt for a certain task, subject or opinion. Conversely, the word also figures in idiomatic phrases such as "the dog's bollocks", "top bollock(s)", or more simply "the bollocks" (as opposed to just "bollocks"), which will refer to something which is admired, approved of or well-respected.
hilary
- 23 Jun 2013 21:22
- 26369 of 81564
Dreamcatcher,
Are you suggesting that Old Bollock Chops' posts are just nonsense, of poor quality and useless?
Fred1new
- 23 Jun 2013 21:23
- 26370 of 81564
You have a choice of UKIP or BNP.
What more do you want?
Read Rawnsley article.
He seems to think that there are more choices, which will suit some.
-------------------------
But at the moment both cons and labs have a few too many "professional", self seeking immature, inexperience MPs.
dreamcatcher
- 23 Jun 2013 21:27
- 26371 of 81564
''But at the moment both cons and labs have a few too many "professional", self seeking immature, inexperience MPs''.
Quick sit down Fred are you feeling ill ? You have questioned the Labour party ? :-))
ps Balance only one L.
dreamcatcher
- 23 Jun 2013 21:34
- 26372 of 81564
I liken you Fred to a MP. When a question is put to them that they do not like the sound of, it does not get answered or post 26370 given instead of an honest answer.Several questions given to you in the above posts, just blew away in the wind. When a question is put and not answered to me the nail as to say has been hit on the head.
dreamcatcher
- 23 Jun 2013 21:43
- 26373 of 81564
I will answer your question Hilary, with a big YES. lol
Ps that is a 100% honest answer. :-))
Fred1new
- 23 Jun 2013 22:00
- 26374 of 81564
Perhaps they were straws in the wind.
TANKER
- 24 Jun 2013 08:46
- 26375 of 81564
the real PAEDOPHILE STUART HALL WHO RAPED YOUNG GIRLS
18 months .
J FORREST who fell in love with a willing and a girl who as said loves him
five and a half years .
2517GEORGE
- 24 Jun 2013 09:33
- 26376 of 81564
dc re your post 26366, Fred stated several years ago that it was his intention to ''Wind up the Blue Rinse Brigade''
2517
Stan
- 24 Jun 2013 09:56
- 26377 of 81564
Brilliant listen on R4 now and for the rest of the week, About Autism.