Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

Petrol Resources 29p to 435 by mid summer (PET)     

chartist2004 - 15 Apr 2004 12:02

The tiny Irish stock on the brink of landing 'the first' post-sanction oil deal in Iraq. Ref 'Fleet Street Letter' 12-04-04..

greekman - 12 Oct 2006 10:48 - 2653 of 2700

DH has just been interviewed by CNN.
It is well worth listening to. Last about 9 mins.

http://www.opec.org/home/Multimedia/videos/2006/OPEC%20Seminar/InterviewHorgan.htm

greekman - 29 Nov 2006 07:49 - 2654 of 2700

Nothing directly to do with PET, so will only put the link.
The article is well worth a read, for those who want a excellently written overall picture of the future in IRAQ. Peace prospects in IRAQ look even less likely.

Max Boot: Iran and Syria aren't our friends in Iraq
Our enemies have no interest in bailing us out, unless they win major concessions.
November 29, 2006

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-boot29nov29,0,5922386.column?coll=la-opinion-columnists

greekman - 29 Nov 2006 09:21 - 2655 of 2700

Decided to sell after much hard thinking. I just about broke even.
Although I still think there is a possibility of PET making good in IRAQ, I feel the risk has become too great even allowing for the Jordanian projects.
(Now watch it fly).
I will look to possibly get back in if things improve, and accept I may miss out on a big rise in the sp.
Thanks to all those who have contributed to many months of discussion.
Good luck to those who are sticking with it.

Haystack - 29 Nov 2006 10:52 - 2656 of 2700

Civil war in Iraq is going to last a few years yet. It will make no difference when the US leaves. In fact I would expect the situation to worsen as the Iraq government is weak and has limited resources. There will be a major power struggle when the US goes. Exploring for oil there is a waste of time for a few years yet.

maestro - 29 Nov 2006 16:51 - 2657 of 2700

i disagree...the insurgents causing all the mayhem are a motley crew of CIA and mossad false flag agents...root these buggers out when the yanks go and peace will ensue

forest - 07 Dec 2006 11:58 - 2658 of 2700

Something brewing?

steveo - 07 Dec 2006 12:08 - 2659 of 2700

Maestro, you are off your rocker

2517GEORGE - 07 Dec 2006 12:09 - 2660 of 2700

Not before time, but looks that way forest.
2517

forest - 07 Dec 2006 12:22 - 2661 of 2700

37% up still climbing.

TheMaster - 21 Dec 2006 12:42 - 2662 of 2700

Iraqi government cabinet news leak today, when this is known to the market this will fly later today.
http://www.kurdmedia.com/news.asp?id=13786

windsorgolf - 21 Dec 2006 14:30 - 2663 of 2700

TheMaster - 21 Dec 2006 12:42 - 2662 of 2662

AGREED...NEWS ON THE WAY...WAS WATCHING GERMAN FINANCE CHANNEL AND THEY ARE VERY BULLISH ON PET...MERRY CHRISTMAS

TheMaster - 22 Dec 2006 12:25 - 2664 of 2700

More good news from Iraq today, PET will prosper from now on

forest - 22 Dec 2006 14:05 - 2665 of 2700

And the news is........................

TheMaster - 28 Dec 2006 15:44 - 2666 of 2700

Good news coming later today on Iraq form Mr Bush

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/6214109.stm

windsorgolf - 02 Jan 2007 14:26 - 2667 of 2700

its getting ready to fly boys

Paperbackwriter - 08 Jan 2007 08:33 - 2668 of 2700

What, no posts on this exciting day for Pet?

2517GEORGE - 08 Jan 2007 08:51 - 2669 of 2700

PBW--- there are two threads on the go, nice increase so far today.
2517

forest - 17 Feb 2007 17:16 - 2670 of 2700

............

maestro - 18 Feb 2007 22:45 - 2671 of 2700

massive rise tomoro...news leaked friday and the city boys were piling in

forest - 25 Feb 2007 13:58 - 2672 of 2700

From the Independent today. Looking very good.

Oil bonanza stays in Western sights after cosmetic change to Iraqi deals
By Tim Webb
Published: 25 February 2007
The final draft of Iraq's controversial hydrocarbons law has been submitted to the Iraqi Cabinet ahead of its presentation to Parliament for ratification next month.

Iraqi officials have attempted to defuse the backlash caused by last month's revelation in The Independent on Sunday that the law would grant foreign oil companies a large slice of the country's oil reserves.

The final draft has quietly dropped the term "production-sharing contracts" used in earlier drafts. These contracts involve energy companies paying for the initial investment in an oil field but reaping bigger returns if their gamble pays off.

The proposed introduction of production-sharing agreements in Iraq is controversial because they are usually used in challenging regions where oil is difficult and expensive to access, such as the Amazon. By contrast, much of Iraq's 112 billion barrels of proven oil reserves - the second-largest in the world - has already been discovered and is cheap to drill.

But the draft, seen exclusively by The Independent on Sunday, still proposes handing over exploration and production contracts for up to 32 years - far longer than most deals between companies and goveernments.

The draft empowers the new Federal Oil and Gas Council to set the exact terms of each contract, but given Iraq's parlous economy and security uncertainties, the terms offered are likely to be very generous. Greg Muttitt, a campaigner from lobby group Platform, said: "This is a huge amount of time. If contracts are signed in the coming months... there will be a massive risk premium, and the Iraqi side would be negotiating from a position of extreme weakness. As a result, the terms would be highly profitable for the companies, and Iraqis would be unable to change them for 20 years."

Other differences between previous drafts include the omission of a requirement for the terms of each contract to be published within two months. Now, according to Article 36, only non-specified "financially significant" details need be published, and no timeframe is given.

Iraqi unions have expressed their opposition to the proposed law. In a speech earlier this month to a conference, Hassan Jumaa, head of the Federation of Oil Unions, said: "We strongly warn all the foreign companies and foreign capital in the form of American companies against coming into our lands under the guise of production-sharing agreements."

Foreign oil firms already operating in Iraq are anxious not to antagonise unions as some may have links to insurgents who could target oil installations.

David Horgan, managing director of Petrel Resources, an AIM-listed oil company focused on Iraq, said contracts could be renegotiated by the government.

"The term 'production-sharing agreement' used in previous drafts has been dropped because of the controversy the term caused. They have built quite a lot of flexibility into the law. It makes sense to reward companies who start work now when the security situation is bad. The terms can always be made less attractive in a few years when things calm down."

He added that the Iraqi government had changed its approach in recent weeks over the hydrocarbons law. Rather than trying to force it through, particularly in the face of opposition from the Kurds in the north seeking more control over their oil resources, officials have attempted to achieve consensus within government, he said.

Last weekend, past and present officials from the oil ministry met in a hotel in Jordan to hammer out the draft's final details.
Register now or login to post to this thread.