Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

Fred
This doesn't look like tribal behaviour. It looks like FRAUD.

Labour has suspended 14 constituencies over possible irregularities. For irregularities read FRAUD.

Hays question...... do you get sexualy excited by this kind of thing?.

Your going to look a real bugga walking out of the house with a big blue conk and a stiffy on down below.

You mean like the impeccable claims for a Wisteria hair cut?

A typically crass comment from you, gf just because someone doesn't agree with your views - post 26808.

FRAUD just look at all the MPs and you will find fraud big time from stealing cash to insider dealing .

UKIP will do just fine has a tory and all my family and friends switched .
the con party is just that cons

ohhhhhh looks like Ive got my stalker following me again on here.

Poor lad must be quiet on advfn, well either that or he cant find someone to have a spat with him.

Shame I have him filtered.

Not you TANKER, poster above Fred.

ps,

Hays is getting very horny today based on Len, Unite, and Labour.

Hes still in denial over UKIP. Its fear you know.

Just reading Evening Standard. They have Labour ahead between 5 and 8 percentage only now.

gf
ive never filtered anyone so im a bit confused by your last 2 posts.
the post above freds last post 26809 as i read it is post 26808 and that is you. and post no.26810 the post below is d4. .hmm i think i may now get it.maybe.
d4 is 26810 which is higher than freds post of 26809 BUT when i read the thread it is shown lower than freds post, is this because he is filtered? and appears differently or am i misunderstanding something?
just out of interest i may now experiment and filter someone just to see how it works.nothing like discovering for oneself.
do you have any suggestions on who or should it be whom? i might use for my experiment? i shall, of course, unfillter them asap.if i do will i be able to read all their previous posts or just those from the time of unfilltering?
thanks
regards
jkd

Hays,

"AS YOU SAID, IT IS HALF TERM"

Bull.

Wait 10 days and review the poll.

Labour should be well down by then.

JKD,

Filter who you like with the squelch button, you can always unsquelch.

I have 4 filtered from about 4 years ago and admit I have not missed their posts.

jkd i dont think its you so you probably dont need to worry too much about possibly being confused fishfinger claims to have squelched loads of peeps on here but i think its funny that he still knows whos posting so he may just be pulling your plonker if you know what i mean anyway i wouldnt worry too much coz you shouldnt expect anything else from a famous economist who fingered bob maxwell cos hes a 10 foot tall cloth cap wearing lard arse diabetic who used to play football for man utd and hes won three world cups and two world wars and he used to box for accrington stanley and he also used to cheerlead for the leeds university netball team and hes real fit but he doesnt know how old he is but hes a leg end in his own y fronts nonetheless

luv

hiltops

Hilary
It all sounds like we are fortunate in the extreme to have the pleasure of his company and the fruits of his undoubted wisdom!

An idiot would know who is posting without seeing the content of the post.

So hilary, with a little luck you should be able to work it out!

h
thanks for that, i luv the luv, well i would, who wouldn't ? you are much esteemed by all on this board. i hold you in high regard,wait for it,. the BUT i also hold gf in high regard also on his stock analysis unless or until proven otherwise.
h did you get carried away with your won three world cups and two world wars etc.?
has he ever suggested this? and can you show and confirm this was posted by him?
so much as i luv u also i must try to be fair and impartial which i suspect you are not being to to gf and i may well be wrong but i fear not. he deserves better.
right or wrong gf deserves a fair trial regarding your above suggestions,
over to gf ..........
regards to all on this board
jkd

jkd luv you too and soz i might have been wrong and it could have been four world cups and three world wars

luv

hiltops

Haystack,

Fortunate? Hmmm, I can think of more appropriate adjectives.

hilary - post 26819 = classic, " a leg end in his own y fronts".:-)

Bookmaker William Hill slashed its odds on Nicaragua to be Snowden's location on January 1, 2014, from 50/1 to 8/1, with Venezuela at 9/4 second favourite.

But Hill's still has the USA as his most likely destination.