goldfinger
- 09 Jun 2005 12:25
Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).
Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.
cheers GF.
goldfinger
- 17 Jul 2013 20:07
- 27351 of 81564
Hays posted.......
Haystack - 17 Jul 2013 19:41 - 27351 of 27357
ESA has nothing to do with being self employed.
Hays, if someone today becomes sick who is self employed and they dont have any savings or relatives to turn to PLEASE EXPLAIN WHAT BENEFIT THEY WOULD CLAIM???????????
Now I await your apology.
Now heres the answer from CAB.......
I am too ill to go to work. Can I get any benefits?
If you can't work because you are sick or disabled, you may qualify for Statutory Sick Pay (SSP). You must earn an average of at least £109 each week to qualify. If you earn less than this amount, or if you're self-employed, you can't get Statutory Sick Pay - you could claim Employment and Support Allowance (ESA) instead.
goldfinger
- 17 Jul 2013 20:09
- 27352 of 81564
Cynic the figures are fiddled and represent nothing like the true state of unemployment in this country. Thats it finito.
Haystack
- 17 Jul 2013 20:12
- 27353 of 81564
gf
The question was not about sickness. If you are self employed, you can get working tax credit, job seekers allowance, housing benefit. Just read the official web pages.
Haystack
- 17 Jul 2013 20:15
- 27354 of 81564
cynic
Are you still on holiday? It is very hot in London. I am just having Parma ham and melon for dinner. Some years ago I stayed in Rome withe the cousin of my best man. He was a general in the Italian Air Force. In the summer, when it was hot he just ate Parma ham and melon for his evening meals.
goldfinger
- 17 Jul 2013 20:18
- 27355 of 81564
Look stop fudging, answer my question above, in fact ive answered it for you.
What a CLOWN you are.
Now we know that
1. your totaly mislead people
2. Your a coward and cant apologise.
goldfinger
- 17 Jul 2013 20:24
- 27356 of 81564
Ive always thought of Haystack as a bully and a coward.
More or less backs up what people on advfn say about him, in fact the names hes called across their I couldnt repeat here.
Of course he wouldnt dare say the same things to people on the spot. His type have an habit of hiding behind a keyboard.
cynic
- 17 Jul 2013 20:28
- 27357 of 81564
sticky - you aren't even clever at this .... try to answer the question asked; you haven't gone anywhere near it yet, but in case you have forgotten what it was, i'll post it yet again ....
re - unemployment numbers - you are claiming or implying that the system/method has been changed since the last election; is that truth or imagination, and if truth, when exactly?
Haystack
- 17 Jul 2013 20:29
- 27358 of 81564
gf
Just to remind you of the posts that began this discussion. You will see that it has nothing to do with sickness.
Look at these links
http://www.turn2us.org.uk/information__resources/benefits/working_or_looking_for_work/self_employment.aspx
and
https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/department-for-work-pensions/about/statistics
.
TANKER - 17 Jul 2013 17:08 - 27335 of 27357
self employed do not get job seekers they claim another benefit which is around the same . cynic
cynic [Send an email to cynic] [View cynic's profile] - 17 Jul 2013 17:15 - 27336 of 27357
really? .... what's it called? ..... any idea?
certainly one of our regular courier chaps would love to know, as he reckons not
Fred1new
- 17 Jul 2013 20:38
- 27359 of 81564
Hays,
When I sat in Zagreb with temperatures in the 30s c, some years ago with the Secretary to the Supreme Court of Croatia (the uncle of my wife), his wife had prepared the food and we started with melon, the wine and other produce were from his friends.
Beautiful evening, but I can't remember what else we ate, but I know it was good, and the company was marvellous and their problems overwhelming.
Memories.
I can recall thinking our aims were similar, but how insignificant we all were.
Perhaps, it was the Slivovitz and Vinjak from friends.
cynic
- 17 Jul 2013 20:47
- 27360 of 81564
sticky - like paxo, i'll ask you the same question yet again .... even a yes or no would be an improvement ...... as you decline to answer, i'ld hazard a guess that the answers are no, not really true at all, well obviously not in that case, but perhaps you'ld care to prove otherwise ...
re unemployment numbers .... you are claiming or implying that the system/method has been changed since the last election; is that truth or imagination, and if truth, when exactly?
as you decline to answer, i'ld hazard a guess that the answers are no, not really true at all, well obviously not in that case, but perhaps you'ld care to prove otherwise ...
goldfinger
- 17 Jul 2013 20:51
- 27361 of 81564
Hays does your wife know your a COWARD?????????????????????
3 monkies
- 17 Jul 2013 21:08
- 27362 of 81564
Sorry gf don't wish to be rude, just read your above comment - your wife now knows that you cannot help her out when the heat is turned up and your need is "just one cornetto" !!!!!!!! Oh! deary me does anyone really know how funny some of the comments are on here?
Haystack
- 17 Jul 2013 21:09
- 27363 of 81564
gf
As usual when you are clearly wrong and wrong at the top of your voice, you resort to abuse. Is this behaviour typical of the misguided left activists we have to put up with. Apart from Tanker, who has rather specific problems, you seem to be the most consistently wrong poster on this BB. It is rarely worth the effort to bring out all your errors. However, when caught bang to rights concerning the rubbish that you post, you never have the good grace to admit your errors or even close to it. I could go on, but the comments would be wasted on you.
goldfinger
- 17 Jul 2013 22:17
- 27364 of 81564
Haystack your a very ignorant old man. An old man that will stop at nothing to cover up your own mistakes and lies. Not only are you a person with no morals but you also thrive on trying to upset other people ie, witness the BLNX thread where you make claims you dont have any postion but day in day out you abuse younger less experienced posters. I have come across some of the most vile posters on B/Boards but you stand out head and shoulders as the worst of them all. Not only are you a liar but you also seem to get some kind of sexual gratification out of your bullying of other people. I just hope your wife and sons never ever see how you conduct yourself on this board or other boards you frequent. Your a little man who seeks security in numbers and a coward who hides behind his keyboard, theirs far more I could throw at you but your so ignorant it would be wasted on you. For gods sake I hope your children dont grow up like you.
cynic
- 17 Jul 2013 22:20
- 27365 of 81564
yet another rant from sticky BUT STILL HE CANNOT OR REFUSES TO ANSWER THE RELATIVELY SIMPLE QUESTION I PUT TO HIM .... you may ask why that would be, or perhaps just go to the simple explanation that he cannot back his allegations with FACT!
dreamcatcher
- 17 Jul 2013 22:33
- 27366 of 81564
Listening to the radio today about hospitals at near breaking point due to this hot spell. Three points came up, two you would think the norm -
1, Heat stroke
2, Sun burn
3. Yes - Toes being cut off by gardeners.
Looks like the sun is going to folks heads.
Haystack
- 17 Jul 2013 22:34
- 27367 of 81564
cynic
Gf's post is one of the funniest I have ever seen. However, I have always taken the view that to get upset about being insulted, you have to have some respect for the person making the insult.
Haystack
- 17 Jul 2013 22:36
- 27368 of 81564
Please don't mention toes being cut off. It gave me a shiver at the thought of it.
dreamcatcher
- 17 Jul 2013 22:43
- 27369 of 81564
In other words think what you are doing and be careful. Shocking. No more mention of toes.
goldfinger
- 17 Jul 2013 22:51
- 27370 of 81564
David Cameron accused of 'weasel words' in Lynton Crosby row
Telegraph.....
David Cameron has refused to say whether he discussed plain cigarette packaging with Lynton Crosby, the Conservative election strategist at the centre of controversy over his links to the tobacco industry.
By Tim Ross, Political Correspondent
7:51PM BST 17 Jul 2013
The Prime Minister faced repeated questioning over the issue as Labour called for an inquiry into whether Mr Crosby's activities breached ministerial standards.
The Tory chairman, Grant Shapps, flatly denied that Mr Crosby had ever even spoken to Mr Cameron about cigarette packaging, but Mr Cameron declined to be so clear when asked about the issue himself.
Mr Crosby, the Australian political consultant, has been hired to advise the Tories on their campaign to win a majority in the 2015 general election.
He masterminded Boris Johnson’s two successful bids for the London Mayoralty and has been credited with sharpening the Conservatives’ focus since he started working for the party nationally in January.
Reports have suggested that Mr Crosby told Mr Cameron to “get the barnacles off the boat” by concentrating on core electoral battlegrounds and abandoning legislation on peripheral and unpopular issues.
However, he is now under scrutiny after it emerged that his company, Crosby Textor, has had clients including the tobacco company, Philip Morris International, which has opposed plans for cigarettes to be sold in plain packages.
The government has now decided to not to introduce a policy on plain cigarette packaging, arguing that there is not enough evidence that such a plan would work.
The Prime Minister insisted he had “never been lobbied” by Mr Crosby on any subject.
But Labour said the careful answer amounted to "weasel words" and claimed Mr Crosby had told Mr Cameron to ditch plain packaging in “a devastating conflict of interest”.
Ed Miliband declared that the Prime Minister could not deny that he “had a conversation with” Mr Crosby about the policy.
The Labour leader wrote to the Cabinet Secretary, Sir Jeremy Heywood, calling on him to investigate whether there had been “a back door breach” of the ministerial code which seeks to prevent conflicts of interest between the government and businesses.
After the clash with Mr Miliband in the Commons, the controversy followed Mr Cameron to Downing Street where he had been holding talks with the Italian Prime Minister, Enrico Letta.
Standing alongside Mr Letta at a press conference in Number 10, Mr Cameron appeared increasingly frustrated at being asked again to give a straight answer on whether he had ever discussed plain packaging with Mr Crosby.
“On the issue of Lynton Crosby, this is a complete red herring which is raised by the Labour Party because they are in political trouble,” Mr Cameron said.
“This is complete nonsense from start to finish.
“As I said, I have never been lobbied by Lynton Crosby about anything. It is not his job to advise on any policies or policy areas. He is paid by the Conservative Party as a campaign adviser.”
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/10186593/David-Cameron-accused-of-weasel-words-in-Lynton-Crosby-row.html