bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
bosley
- 12 Apr 2005 21:43
- 2744 of 27111
off topic. andysmith, i think you've got the same feeling about moi as i have. could this be next years seo, perhaps......?
andysmith
- 12 Apr 2005 21:50
- 2745 of 27111
I think that Moi could be next years SEO, another recovery stock with ten-bagger written all over it. Only small amount of dosh left at moment but due some in June and may increase position in MOI then. Can you believe how well we have done with SEO this year? Just when you think the sp is running out of steam they deliver more good news. How long until a US supply deal? Almost certainly with Walmart?
ptholden
- 12 Apr 2005 22:08
- 2746 of 27111
Fascinating that MOI should receive a mention. Kicked off a new bout of research last night, totally independant of MoneyAM and amongst a shortlist of 20 companies or so, MOI feature. Probably no great recommendation, but it all helps to lend credence.
PTH
Poverty
- 13 Apr 2005 00:11
- 2749 of 27111
What a performer - SEO down 1.5 at mid-day then closes even! These shares are amazingly resilient.
Di - you don't need to listen to Uncle Eric too closely - he tends to eulogise about a share the moment before it dips! However - longer term I agree with him and SD et al that SEO have a lot further to travel - and I am indeed hoping so! 1 per share in 12 months - well why not!?
I have been in and out of SEO this year - and very happily too! Like you I don't always get the right sell date but so far my stockmarket experience this year is heaps better than last year.
I don't have 100million shares like some posters of this BB say they have! However 15% is 15% whatever you've got.
bosley
- 13 Apr 2005 07:55
- 2750 of 27111
morning all. so we are agreed. shares on the up and up dont move in straight lines. so really, there is no need to panic when we have the occassional dip, as sd said. hoping for a steady eddie day.
aldwickk
- 13 Apr 2005 08:11
- 2751 of 27111
aldwickk
- 13 Apr 2005 08:15
- 2752 of 27111
aldwickk
- 13 Apr 2005 08:18
- 2753 of 27111
Looks like they parted company in december.
aldwickk
- 13 Apr 2005 08:45
- 2754 of 27111
bhunt1910
- 13 Apr 2005 08:47
- 2755 of 27111
Aldwickk - I especialy like the last chart
B
aldwickk
- 13 Apr 2005 08:51
- 2756 of 27111
BPRG have just issued a statement, don't sound to good.
bosley
- 13 Apr 2005 08:58
- 2757 of 27111
have you seen bprg now. f**k me!!!!
Chiva20
- 13 Apr 2005 09:18
- 2758 of 27111
Those poor BPRG holders, devastating .. I think Seo might be down in sympathy?
Barry Harris
- 13 Apr 2005 09:23
- 2759 of 27111
BPRG holders should salvage what they still have and re-invest in seo and imo will recover their loses in the very near future
aldwickk
- 13 Apr 2005 09:25
- 2760 of 27111
Can they afford the SEO court case ?
Chiva20
- 13 Apr 2005 09:47
- 2761 of 27111
Lol Barry I was going to mention they do that on the BPRG thread but was conscious I would get shot down! It's a welcome suggestion here
Barry Harris
- 13 Apr 2005 09:55
- 2762 of 27111
My post above (2758) is not not intended to offend any holder of BPRG. I really do have respect for all share holders. (expect shorters- who I believe borrow our shares))We are all in the same game trying to make a few bob. SEO is possible one way to stem those loses
stockdog
- 13 Apr 2005 09:56
- 2763 of 27111
Perhaps it's worth SEO casting its eye over the value of BPRG's IP assets and making an all share offer for them.
There is obvious synergy both in the operational interest and cancelling in a novel way the court case, so all those provisions can be written back to P&L on both sides.
It would give BPRG shareholders fair value based on good future prospects.
It keeps BPRG in business, although inevitably some overhead cost savings and redundancies (especially failed top management) would be required.
Their bio-degradable medicine capsule seems a good product if it can be properly marketed and rolled out (SEO would be good at this I am sure).
Then there are all the other IP goodies in BPRG's bag.
It would be a grand gesture with a keen eye to future expansion of profits for SEO.
The potential dilution on SEO's SP should not be too great to bear.
Anyone know Ian Balkin well enough to propose this to him?
SD