Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

William Hill (WMH)     

rolling - 04 Nov 2003 14:05

Where do you think they will go to or should i sell now

HARRYCAT - 29 Jan 2014 16:32 - 278 of 472

.

jimmy b - 29 Jan 2014 16:33 - 279 of 472

I'm not a chartest HARRY .

HARRYCAT - 29 Jan 2014 16:37 - 280 of 472

Not sure I can read this one with any accuracy. Just interested to see if 300p was an obvious support level. Think once it goes below 340p with any momentum then .......280p?

skinny - 29 Jan 2014 16:42 - 281 of 472

I bit the bullet on this dog @343.

Chris Carson - 29 Jan 2014 21:10 - 282 of 472

They seem to be their own worst enemy at the moment, regarding football odds anyway. Offering 6/1 Aquiro 1st goalscorer and City win against Spurs tonight. Considering Aquiro scores every game he plays no brainer. :O)

goldfinger - 29 Jan 2014 21:50 - 283 of 472

COULD be at support level looking at longer term chart over 3 years. Note right on 100% Fibonnaci retracement, but does fundies rule here ie, the gaming machines.

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=WMH&Si

Chris Carson - 29 Jan 2014 21:55 - 284 of 472

I think America could be their saviour GF reading posts from accross the road. I may get back in tomorrow well overdone imo.

Chris Carson - 29 Jan 2014 21:57 - 285 of 472

Target initially 400.0 to close the gap.

goldfinger - 29 Jan 2014 22:04 - 286 of 472

Looks tempting Chris but the broader market will stop me from trading until I see it settle down.

goldfinger - 30 Jan 2014 08:40 - 287 of 472

Anybody had the balls to go long? it is blue at the moment.

jimmy b - 30 Jan 2014 08:58 - 288 of 472

No not yet , the threat of legislation re the machines plus a dodgy market .

goldfinger - 30 Jan 2014 09:37 - 289 of 472

Turned red Jimmy.

This market is dodgy at the moment.

So volatile either way. If I had the time id be shorting some stocks but you need to be at the PC all day with this kind of volatility.

jimmy b - 30 Jan 2014 09:44 - 290 of 472

Yup i think this has 3 quid on it . Bloody Milliband ! ,will they really try and limit these machines ,think of the tax they make .

Chris Carson - 05 Feb 2014 16:54 - 291 of 472

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=WMH&Si

Chris Carson - 05 Feb 2014 16:56 - 292 of 472

Limit Buy on spreads triggered today @ 341p tight stop.

Credit Suisse outperform 341 445 reiterates.
Jefferies Buy 342 530 retains.

Chris Carson - 07 Feb 2014 13:56 - 293 of 472

Stop to entry for risk free trade.

Chris Carson - 20 Feb 2014 08:24 - 294 of 472

Went long (insanity) @ 351.3 (SB) on gap up at open. Tight stop. Initial target 380p

cynic - 20 Feb 2014 11:39 - 295 of 472

hindsight says should have sat tight or bought at 330 :-)
i'm sure many will say that is exactly what they did!

skinny - 20 Feb 2014 11:41 - 296 of 472

This is on my list of 'shares never to touch again' - bloody dog.

1241100353_anchorman-kicking-the-dog.gif

HARRYCAT - 20 Feb 2014 11:48 - 297 of 472

Goldman Sachs note:
"Scenario analysis of possible regulatory outcomes suggests Ladbrokes impacted the most given high UK retail exposure We thus see a wide range of regulatory outcomes as possible, from interruptions in play (e.g. periodic warnings) to more material regulatory outcomes, such as a maximum stake reduction, either as a consequence of RGT recommendations or because the government takes “precautionary” action. We ran a scenario analysis of more material regulatory outcomes and see maximum stake reductions to £50 or £20 as possible; however, we reflect a number of key assumptions in these scenarios, including: 1) player duration increasing, 2) some substitution of lower machine spend to over the counter betting, and 3) bookmakers closing a tail end of unprofitable shops. Considering a £20 maximum stake, we forecast 2015 EPS declines of 37%, 12% and 4% for Ladbrokes, William Hill and Paddy Power, respectively (and 2015E UK Retail EBIT/shop declining 22%-33%).
12m PTs partly reflect possible regulation: Ladbrokes still Sell (20% downside); William Hill (+18%) and Paddy Power (+15%) up to Buy We analysed valuation sensitivities and even in a £20 max stake scenario see upside potential of 12% for William Hill and 13% for Paddy Power; Ladbrokes’ high UK retail exposure (81% 2015E EBIT vs. William Hill 45% and Paddy Power 16%) implies 32% downside. Owing to regulatory uncertainty, we reflect 50% of the potential impact of this scenario in our 12m SOTPbased price targets. Given upside to William Hill (18%, 12m price target now 410p) and Paddy Power (15%, 12m price target now €67, also reflecting changes in our target multiples) we upgrade both to Buy. We remain Sell on Ladbrokes (-20% downside, new 12m price target 120p). We make minor estimate changes but do not reflect the scenarios in our estimates."
Register now or login to post to this thread.