SueHelen
- 06 Oct 2005 19:29
edited by moneyam
dell314
- 11 Oct 2005 19:10
- 28 of 1904
Sue - your post 26 is complete rubbish.
BSP have been amortising goodwill.
DMR have written down tangible assets to expected realisable value after a disposal of assets by liquidators in South Africa.
Do you understand the difference??
Regarding your swimming pool analogy, DMR have made no separate comment about diminution of tangible assets due to reduced economic benefit.
Also, valuing an asset according to economic benefit, would include all future economic benefit. You can't write down the value of your swimming pool to zero just for the period of your water shortage, unless you assume that there will be no water in the future, either.........
In short, please stop posting utter twaddle.
Rgds
dell
All IMHO, DYOR etc.
SueHelen
- 11 Oct 2005 19:12
- 29 of 1904
That is why the price is at 0.30 pence....and not at 5.00-6.00 pence if the stone value was added into the accounts. If it works out like BSP which I think will....again see your posts there at the 0.30 pence prices before the big surge to 1.30 pence when they announced the value they had in ACS and Geosim.
A high-risk gamble which could pay for the house in the future.
dell314
- 11 Oct 2005 19:30
- 30 of 1904
Sue - You were only in BSP for your usual attempt at a short term pump'n'dump. You sold out months before its rise, so please stop lying.
Incidentally, do you actually understand anything that I've written in post 28??
I think you are going to have a shock when DMR announce the proceeds of their South African asset sale....
Rgds
dell
All IMHO, DYOR etc.
Dil
- 11 Oct 2005 19:39
- 31 of 1904
1.3 million shares and just as many aliases hey Sue ?
I'll take a look and let you know what I think.
Dil
- 11 Oct 2005 19:41
- 32 of 1904
And re BSP .... what about all the sh*te you have pumped that has crashed ???
QTR thread is a classic for anyone who would like to see what a lying sh*t you are.
Best regards.
markp
- 11 Oct 2005 19:46
- 33 of 1904
Also CMS Webview. Another SH ramp.
"it'll be 50p by Christmas" ~ quote of the decade!
Let the buyer beware, especially when SH recommends it.
SueHelen
- 11 Oct 2005 20:03
- 34 of 1904
Shame you guys did not appear on the EVS threads when the price was at 3 pence.
Hi markp...have u seen the BSP thread then as well...to see what dell314 wrote at the 0.30 pence prices.
SueHelen
- 11 Oct 2005 20:04
- 35 of 1904
You seem to have stop posting on one of my others dell314...TPA seems to be well up since few days ago when you could not stop your deramping for some reason.
SueHelen
- 11 Oct 2005 20:05
- 36 of 1904
Nav calculator with 197,042,498 shares @10/10/05
Market price (pence).........NAV (m)
0.20.............................0.39
0.30.............................0.59
0.40.............................0.79
0.50.............................0.99
0.60.............................1.18
0.70.............................1.38
0.80.............................1.58
0.90.............................1.77
1.00.............................1.97
1.10.............................2.17
1.20.............................2.36
1.30.............................2.56
1.40.............................2.76
1.50.............................2.96
1.60.............................3.15
1.70.............................3.35
1.80.............................3.55
1.90.............................3.74
2.00.............................3.94
SueHelen
- 11 Oct 2005 20:05
- 37 of 1904
Reverse takeover is also in the offing...the nav calculator may prove useful if DMR inject a new company shortly to enable us to put a price target on the new company (I may have to recalculate if more shares are issued - though I'm hoping it will be aquired via long-term convertible loans).
dell314
- 11 Oct 2005 20:26
- 38 of 1904
Sue - you sold TPA at breakeven or a small loss. It is obvious that you don't hold it anymore, as you've stopped pumping it.
FWIW, I still wouldn't touch it, as they are at the mercy of HSBC; the bank that did the dirty on HTH in similar circumstances but I suppose it may be OK for those who like a gamble.
Your NAV calculator(nicked from a poster on ADVFN, like most of your posts) suggests that DMR is currently overvalued on a NAV basis, as shareholder funds are currently a tad over 400k.
I hope that helps.......
Rgds
dell
All IMHO, DYOR etc.
SueHelen
- 11 Oct 2005 20:32
- 39 of 1904
Again that is what you use when I get one over you....say that I sold out. I have better things to with my time rather than get into slanging matches...I don't have the luxury like you to spend time deramping on my stocks.
I'm mystified that the so called expert on balance sheets was ramping My Travel at the 40 pence levels.
dell314
- 11 Oct 2005 20:39
- 40 of 1904
Suhail - You appear to be oblivious to the following facts:
1) DMR's South African assets are currently being sold/auctioned by the SA equivelant of liquidators.
2) DMR have consequently written down the assets of their SA subsidiaries to expected realisable value from the asset sales.
Which part of this don't you understand?
Have you actually read any of the recent RNS releases?
Rgds
dell
All IMHO, DYOR etc.
SueHelen
- 11 Oct 2005 20:41
- 41 of 1904
As I said how come you did not visit the EVS thread at the 3 pence prices....
How many times dell314....the price is where it is because it is unclear.....if they can sell the stone then 5-6 pence here we come.
SueHelen
- 11 Oct 2005 20:41
- 42 of 1904
Ps. You have not posted on my CLS thread today...is it because the price closed blue today. Doesn't surprise me.
SueHelen
- 11 Oct 2005 21:50
- 43 of 1904
Just re-reading the header:
'
What other benefits are there for being listed in Bermuda?
1. Apparently, nobody has to declare how much stock they hold - even if over 3%(unless they are a financial institution directly involved with the company (formerly Hoodless brennan has to declare)
2. Tax benefits for the company, meaning potentially more dividends.'
I suggest adding:
3. A portfolio of resources located in RSA held in bermuda (i.e. offshore to rsa) might be more marketable to global resource companies.
those with long memories may recall that this use of holding companies located
offshore to rsa has enabled considerable unbundling, restructuring and unlocking of value in recent years, prior to which value within was not fully reflected in share prices.
SueHelen
- 11 Oct 2005 21:52
- 44 of 1904
DMR will unlock the value of the stone deposits in the future....it's at your own perils whether you decide to buy now ahead of the unlocking of value...or wait for them to unlock the value and get in at 5-6 pence which will be the value of the shares once they have.
Dil
- 12 Oct 2005 00:12
- 45 of 1904
Now your back ... would you like to admit that you were blatently lying on the QTR thread Sue ?
Dil
- 12 Oct 2005 00:15
- 46 of 1904
Why should anyone (apart from your numerous aliases) believe anything you post ?
Throwing darts at the share section of the FT would over time get better results than investing in the sh*te you ramp.
dell314
- 12 Oct 2005 07:30
- 47 of 1904
Suhail - You appear to be oblivious to the following facts:
1) DMR's South African assets are currently being sold/auctioned by the SA equivelant of liquidators.
2) DMR have consequently written down the assets of their SA subsidiaries to expected realisable value from the asset sales. This figuire is 400k.
Which part of this don't you understand?
Have you actually read any of the recent RNS releases?
Rgds
dell
All IMHO, DYOR etc.