Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.
  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2

Questions and answers (HELP)     

jimward9 - 09 Jan 2006 12:38

Out their in cyber space, there are thousands if not millions of you with different jobs and qualifications.
Can you answer any questions, or do you have a question!

ExecLine - 04 Dec 2018 23:19 - 28 of 37

I don't mind wasting my money on insurance. Hopefully, it should always be a waste of money.

Wouldn't it have been nice to be a lovely waste of money for all those California householders who lost their homes in the fires?

ExecLine - 04 Dec 2018 23:19 - 29 of 37

.

HARRYCAT - 05 Dec 2018 10:53 - 30 of 37

Thanks, but the analogy isn't quite the same.
According to Martin Lewis (Moneysavingexpert) the chance of being investigated by HMRC as a private individual is about 3%. I have a feeling that the chance of wild fires in California is about the same risk as seeing a tornado in tornado alley!

CC - 05 Dec 2018 11:03 - 31 of 37

Personally I wouldn't bother with the insurance.

There are two reasons you are likely to be investigated:
a) HMRC have evidence your return is incorrect. In which case it's highly likely the insurance won't cover you unless HMRC have got their information wrong
b) HMRC assert the tax calculation done by your accountants is wrong. In which case you shouldn't be paying if your accountants have got it wrong and don't need insurance or alternatively your accountants have got it right in which case it should be easily resolvable.


I wouldn't bother. I don't. Especially as your affairs aren't complex.



kernow - 05 Dec 2018 11:06 - 32 of 37

Self insure I’d say.
1. If your accountants have messed up then they pay.
2. if a random enquiry (less likely simply beacause you use accountants) then the process is routine.
3. If you’ve not made full and frank disclosure to your accountants I’d bet the insurance is void?
From personal experience an enquiry is scary but the people I dealt with were very fair and helpful in pointing out the mistake I’d made at the expense of the underpaid tax.

Stan - 05 Dec 2018 11:35 - 33 of 37

If your affairs are fairly simple then I would say do it yourself and as for insurance definitely no.

Just be honest with your figures and if they are wrong then you will simply be asked to correct them, I’ve always found the HMRC very amiable and helpful.

Main point is Harry to get them in before the deadlines.

skinny - 05 Dec 2018 11:36 - 34 of 37

What's a tax return? :-)

HARRYCAT - 05 Dec 2018 11:43 - 35 of 37

Thanks guys for the input.
My research has turned up the fact that if I bought the insurance policy myself it would cost around £75, so clearly the accountancy firm are adding their 'administration fee'.
However, they counter this by saying that I will have access to a helpline for advice on health & safety and Employment law! Hmmmmm..............

HARRYCAT - 05 Dec 2018 11:45 - 36 of 37

Skinny, clearly with your offshore accounts you are outside UK HMRC jurisdiction! ;o)

Stan - 05 Dec 2018 12:00 - 37 of 37

Skinny offshore? Give me your number right now Skinny as I must do my civic duty )-:
  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2
Register now or login to post to this thread.