Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

ASK a trading question! (ASK)     

Crocodile - 12 Sep 2003 23:06

We have lots of experienced traders on MoneyAM who would be glad to help if you have any trading questions.

FirstCall - 28 Jan 2004 08:37 - 282 of 460

Zoltar

Quote: "It should jump out at you"

Very enigmatic.

Has it really made a difference to your trading?

Zoltar - 28 Jan 2004 11:00 - 283 of 460

Yes - as far as stock selection goes....I can whizz through stock charts on Sharescope to see which ones I'm interested in.
Still got to get timing right though....which is easier said than done!
ZOLTAR

FirstCall - 28 Jan 2004 19:27 - 284 of 460

Zoltar

Would you then reccomend the course you went on to others?
Who ran it?
How much do they cost?

Has anyone else found useful training anywhere?

Gausie - 28 Jan 2004 20:47 - 285 of 460

Firstcall

http://www.glomtc.com

Zoltar - 29 Jan 2004 15:42 - 286 of 460

Firstcall.
It all depends how much time you want to put in and how much you want to spend.
I like books.....you get much more for your money, and you learn at your own pace. Courses are much more expensive, and you get lots of information put in front of you in a very short time - easy to miss things.
I went on the GLOMTC trading course, which cost 350. It was very good, and was run by David Jones (limpsfield chartist) and Mike Boydell (bullshare).
Was it worth the money? hmmmmmmmmmmm???? On balance yes, even though I'd already learnt lots from my books - I've got most of the common ones that everyone talks about. But they emphasize which are the most important things.....coz there's lots of 'non information' on trading that just acts as a distraction.
In this game knowledge is power......and there's lots to learn and lots of traps and pitfalls.......which I've been caught in many times......and still do......I'm only just learning that spreadbet companies are b******rds, especially their rip off spreads.......and put a stop on something and it becomes almost magnetic for their quotes...but enough moaning...
Overall, it depends how serious you want to take things and how much money you want to spend.
Hope this helps
ZOLTAR

Zoltar - 29 Jan 2004 15:56 - 287 of 460

.....and one other thing. You need your own software. Sharescope is the best use of twelve quid a month I've ever spent. It's all too easy to just rely on a few people's postings on a bb, but you need to do your own thing to ever make it trading...not that I'm saying I have coz I haven't.....but I know you won't ever improve at all, not even on to the first rung of the long learning ladder, if you just take others' tips. And sharescope gives all the fundies and charty stuff you need....
ZOLTAR

cladisporium - 30 Jan 2004 12:05 - 288 of 460

Can you please explain why, after acting on your tip (Cytomyx Holdings), It would seem I have lost substantially as a result of consolidation. I originally tried to purchase 8000 of stock at the end of Dec 2003, however I could at that time only purchase blocks of 25,000 shares @ 1.65p (412.50)
Two days later I found I could purchase 8000 of stock which I did at 1.75p.
The following day I received a letter from my stockbroker informing me that subject to approval at an EGM to be held on 12 Jan 2004 that the ordinary shares would be consolidated at 2.5p for every 25 ordinary 0.1p share. This effectively valued my holding at approx 6500 a loss of nearly 2000. Surely this cannot be correct. can you comment please

little woman - 30 Jan 2004 12:29 - 289 of 460

All shares are given a notional value when they are first issued, which never changes. What you pay for the share is the traded price not the notional price.

You bought ordinary shares of 0.1p for for the amount they traded at of 1.75p

The consolidated shares are just the notional price being increased, to reduce the amount of shares in issue.

I was looking at the share price, and in dec 03 it was trading between 30-40p so I don't understand how you paid 1.75p

You should expect the trade price to change in line with the change in shares in issue.

little woman - 30 Jan 2004 12:59 - 290 of 460

For anyone who needed proof of why looking at the buys & sells trades are misleading, take a look at TGM.

Currently only two trades. The second one is recorded as a sell because of the price. I infact bought 582 shares @ 149.50 for my long term portfolio. I saw the price my broker was prepared to sell the shares for and I couldn't refuse.

I suspect the broker had some shares he wanted to sell, and thats why I got such a good price. Prices are dictated a lot of the time by how much stock the broker has available, within the bid & offer prices which are dictated by the MM.

washlander - 01 Feb 2004 12:23 - 291 of 460

Anyone suggest a good book I could buy that would show me how to use graphs properly. I intend to go on a one day course in the near future and feel it would be beneficial if I had a basic understanding, when it come to reading resistance points in realtion to volume and price.
Thanks in advance.

Grandma - 02 Feb 2004 14:37 - 292 of 460

(New user) How do I find last reference to a Company from the very long list in Investors Room? Is there an index ? eg today I looked for Vislink.

IanT(MoneyAM) - 02 Feb 2004 14:40 - 293 of 460

Graandma,

If you click on the Search button at the top you will be given a number of options to search for.

Regards

Ian

Grandma - 02 Feb 2004 14:47 - 294 of 460

Thanks for prompt reply. xx Grandma

little woman - 02 Feb 2004 14:50 - 295 of 460

You may also find the EPIC box is case sensitive!

Grandma - 02 Feb 2004 21:32 - 296 of 460

When VLK at last found, found the original title no longer appropriate. Can it be changed, or does one start anather thread?

snowballroller - 03 Feb 2004 00:43 - 297 of 460

refer to CGT rule- about last in first out(share dealing),say if i made 3 different lots of buying "xyz" as following 1) apr/03 100k cost 3,000; 2) may/03 150k cost 4,800; 3) Dec/03 250k cost 7,375. And i sold 300k shares
at Feb/04, i understand that i sold the 250k bought on dec/03 plus 50k from may/03 `s stuff ,but not know the cost base of the block sold.Is it 7,375+
1600= 8,975 or the pooling of all three transctions and take a avg @price
*300k; =9,105 ? Please any one know the answer.


little woman - 03 Feb 2004 08:46 - 298 of 460

You take the actual cost of the the shares. You would actually break the sale into 2 transactions, prorata and then put it againt the purchases. The reason for breaking it down is incase you have taper relief (or what was in place prior to taper relief) to claim etc.

Also the reason for breaking down the deals is in case you purchase the shares back within 30 days then, then it can become very complicated!

Fundamentalist - 03 Feb 2004 08:46 - 299 of 460

You work the cost out from the specific shares sold - hence you are selling 250K bought at for 7375 and 50K bought for 1600 hence 8,975 - the cost always stays with the specific share

snowballroller - 03 Feb 2004 10:29 - 300 of 460

little woman & Fundamentalist; thankyou for the help,very much appreciated.
rgds SBR

dominic - 06 Feb 2004 16:52 - 301 of 460

Cladisporium & LW, re Cytomyx,

LW, Cytomyx wasn't trading at 30-40p in December, you are looking at a chart that has already adjusted for the 1 for 25 consolidation on 13/01/04. Today's closing price of 32p is equivalent to 1.28p.

1.75p purchase price late Dec means you are in at an equivalent of 43.75p now.
Register now or login to post to this thread.