goldfinger
- 09 Jun 2005 12:25
Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).
Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.
cheers GF.
goldfinger
- 28 Aug 2013 16:32
- 28282 of 81564
Excelent point made Fred.
Im just so fed up with this spending whilst others in society are here in this country so let down by the government.
ps, I dont mean scroungers.
cynic
- 28 Aug 2013 16:52
- 28283 of 81564
surprised you didn't observe that donne referred to europe only and thus m/e could be left to fend for itself :-)
================
i'm afraid that wishing for UN to have more teeth is just a pipedream of a pipedream .... totally impossible to rewrite the rules and have them accepted by even 15% of the members
Haystack
- 28 Aug 2013 17:01
- 28284 of 81564
Anyone know people in Cyprus? There have been extra air force movements there today and air strikes would come from the bases there. Look at the map. Being just off the west coast of Syria, it is within missile distance. Syria has already said there would be a strong response.
cynic
- 28 Aug 2013 17:01
- 28285 of 81564
old news re build-up in akrotiri but plenty of other options too
indeed as it's so blatant, it's quite likely to be just a feint
Fred1new
- 28 Aug 2013 17:14
- 28286 of 81564
Manuel.
I did but my vision stretched further.
Someday the rules will be amended or the UN will become defunct like previous organisations.
-------
Just listened to J Baez.
We shall overcome someday.
--------
Hopes!!!!!
----
If USA etc. intervenes I think it will be bloody!
cynic
- 28 Aug 2013 17:30
- 28287 of 81564
not you and europe you muppet - fishfinger!
and yes, it is certainly not unlikely that UN will crumble away in the fullness of time, just as did the League of Nations
and yes, of course USA will intervene in Syria though hopefully with the sanction of UN ..... for sure UK and France will support this in some way as will the Arab League though rather more discreetly
Fred1new
- 28 Aug 2013 17:42
- 28288 of 81564
doodlebug4
- 28 Aug 2013 17:51
- 28289 of 81564
USA will intervene in Syria with or without the sanction of the UN. The USA will do exactly as it wants, it has always been the case and one of these days the USA will bite off a bit more than it can chew.
cynic
- 28 Aug 2013 18:26
- 28290 of 81564
been sucking on a lemon or did you swallow a wasp?
mnamreh
- 28 Aug 2013 19:17
- 28291 of 81564
.
Fred1new
- 28 Aug 2013 19:31
- 28292 of 81564
DB,
What the USA thinks advantageous to itself at this moment in time.
The time span of a day trader comes into mind.
When you rely on your muscle, the long term outcome is not considered, as you have a belief that you can batter the other group into submitting to your way of thinking.
--------
I had hoped for more from Obama, but no more from Camoron, but both are stuck with present circumstances partly as a result of Bush and Blair previous stupidity.
But Camoron is also exploiting the stage for political gain and distraction from his economic mismanagement.
(Wants his place as a failed war leader, as well as the PM who failed the UK economy.)
Interesting to see what the vote in the political game will be tomorrow.
Haystack
- 28 Aug 2013 19:37
- 28293 of 81564
Check the meaning of syllogism. You may mean a tautology but it is not syllogism. The reason I described the use of CWs was to explain the reasons for responding and because there was a post above saying that it did not matter how people died.
Fred1new
- 28 Aug 2013 19:39
- 28294 of 81564
N or .,
Post 28293
I thought I was cynical.
But the buggers get away with it.
'!'
~
mnamreh
- 28 Aug 2013 20:48
- 28295 of 81564
.
Haystack
- 28 Aug 2013 21:07
- 28296 of 81564
I remember studying Aristotean syllogisms at school. A syllogism is nothing like the statement I made. Syllogisms are methods of drawing a conclusions from two premises. They are of the style:- this is true, this is also true an therefore we can deduce something else.
mnamreh
- 28 Aug 2013 21:22
- 28297 of 81564
.
Fred1new
- 29 Aug 2013 09:20
- 28298 of 81564
Hays,
You often do.
8-)
----------
Interesting to see the tory backbench informing Camoron that they can't be taken for granted.
cynic
- 29 Aug 2013 09:42
- 28299 of 81564
that's what good parliamentary debate is all about, especially when it comes to a situation as serious as present
Fred1new
- 29 Aug 2013 09:54
- 28300 of 81564
I would call it the Camoron spinning on his heels and doing one of his biggest U-turns yet.
"Fools rush in where angels fear to tread."
Cameron is no angel!
Perhaps, he will revert to being Obama's poodle.
cynic
- 29 Aug 2013 10:01
- 28301 of 81564
you can call anything you like whatever you like as you don't like anything ..... had cameron taken no position at all, you would have said he was a pathetic wimp and should be showing leadership for the country