Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

old news re build-up in akrotiri but plenty of other options too
indeed as it's so blatant, it's quite likely to be just a feint

Manuel.

I did but my vision stretched further.

Someday the rules will be amended or the UN will become defunct like previous organisations.

-------

Just listened to J Baez.

We shall overcome someday.
--------
Hopes!!!!!

----

If USA etc. intervenes I think it will be bloody!

not you and europe you muppet - fishfinger!

and yes, it is certainly not unlikely that UN will crumble away in the fullness of time, just as did the League of Nations

and yes, of course USA will intervene in Syria though hopefully with the sanction of UN ..... for sure UK and France will support this in some way as will the Arab League though rather more discreetly

For the sentimental ;
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/5f/Joan_Baez_performs_We_Shall_Overcome_Feb_09_2010.ogv/220px--Joan_Baez_performs_We_Shall_Overcome_Feb_09_2010.ogv.jpg

USA will intervene in Syria with or without the sanction of the UN. The USA will do exactly as it wants, it has always been the case and one of these days the USA will bite off a bit more than it can chew.

been sucking on a lemon or did you swallow a wasp?

.

DB,

What the USA thinks advantageous to itself at this moment in time.

The time span of a day trader comes into mind.

When you rely on your muscle, the long term outcome is not considered, as you have a belief that you can batter the other group into submitting to your way of thinking.
--------

I had hoped for more from Obama, but no more from Camoron, but both are stuck with present circumstances partly as a result of Bush and Blair previous stupidity.

But Camoron is also exploiting the stage for political gain and distraction from his economic mismanagement.

(Wants his place as a failed war leader, as well as the PM who failed the UK economy.)


Interesting to see what the vote in the political game will be tomorrow.

Check the meaning of syllogism. You may mean a tautology but it is not syllogism. The reason I described the use of CWs was to explain the reasons for responding and because there was a post above saying that it did not matter how people died.

N or .,

Post 28293

I thought I was cynical.

But the buggers get away with it.

'!'
~

.

I remember studying Aristotean syllogisms at school. A syllogism is nothing like the statement I made. Syllogisms are methods of drawing a conclusions from two premises. They are of the style:- this is true, this is also true an therefore we can deduce something else.

.

Hays,

You often do.

8-)

----------

Interesting to see the tory backbench informing Camoron that they can't be taken for granted.

that's what good parliamentary debate is all about, especially when it comes to a situation as serious as present

I would call it the Camoron spinning on his heels and doing one of his biggest U-turns yet.

"Fools rush in where angels fear to tread."

Cameron is no angel!

Perhaps, he will revert to being Obama's poodle.

you can call anything you like whatever you like as you don't like anything ..... had cameron taken no position at all, you would have said he was a pathetic wimp and should be showing leadership for the country

What are cameroons aims?

Convincing himself.

But he is a pathetic wimp, out to save his own skin.

I would prefer to see a leader who is honest and has a sense of direction for the benefit of the country as a whole rather his own skin which is dependent on some of his party.

He lacks long term judgement skills.

And you are right, I don't like Camoron and didn't like Blair. (PR stuntmen.)

Can give a longer list, but think both of these are shallow and more interested in their place in history and public acclaim than enacting well thought out policies which are beneficial for the future of the UK (and Europe) as a whole.