goldfinger
- 09 Jun 2005 12:25
Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).
Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.
cheers GF.
skinny
- 30 Aug 2013 08:09
- 28373 of 81564
You are funny.
goldfinger
- 30 Aug 2013 08:10
- 28374 of 81564
TANKER..... that list of Tory rebels above.......think UKIP.
Micheal Gove had a shouting match with them last night and no doubt the knives will be out for them.
Camoron thought last week it was a sure thing. Parliament proved him wrong and proved what a little arogant man he is.
How can MPs look their constituents in the face and on the one hand justify austerity whilst their leader is going about spending money like theirs no tomorrow on Foreign Aid and War.
Common sense prevailed.
Camoron should be kicked out by his own party now.
TANKER
- 30 Aug 2013 08:21
- 28375 of 81564
CAMERON AS FCUKED UP THE PARTY HE IS A LIAR. SNIGGERING YESTERDAY ON
SOMETHING SO IMMMPORTANT
I will never vote for my party again with these arsewipes now running the party
DAVID DAVIES IS THE MAN TO RUN THE PARTY
or we vote UKIP
goldfinger
- 30 Aug 2013 08:32
- 28376 of 81564
Fred1new
- 30 Aug 2013 08:33
- 28377 of 81564
Basically Parliament doesn't trust Cameron and rightly so.
It doesn't trust his judgement.
The Tory party doesn't trust its own "leader" and rightly so.
The majority of the country doesn't trust the tories and its leadership.
Camoron should go, he was and is a poser.
Go now.
---------------------
TANKER
- 30 Aug 2013 08:36
- 28378 of 81564
let the muslim countries sort out the problems not Christian countries
they will only stab us in the back .if you asked the muslims to vote on the issue they would say keep out
Fred1new
- 30 Aug 2013 08:41
- 28379 of 81564
BUT.
"Daniel Finkelstein writes…
“Syria is the Iraq of the non-interventionists. We did nothing and the situation got worse. And the worse the situation got, the more we used it as an excuse to do nothing. Thus we are told that the opposition is now controlled by Islamic fundamentalists, while the liberal dissidents are nowhere. But this is hardly surprising when every force in Syria is being provided with support and weapons — except for the liberal dissidents. In Iraq we invaded to find no stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction; in Syria we did nothing and it turns out they did have stockpiles of chemical weapons and they used them.”
UmHH
TANKER
- 30 Aug 2013 08:47
- 28380 of 81564
the terrorists used the weapons not the gov .that is my view assad had nothing to gain
skinny
- 30 Aug 2013 08:49
- 28381 of 81564
TANKER
- 30 Aug 2013 08:50
- 28382 of 81564
Richard bacon on bbc now he is 100% correct were are the arab league they should be leading the actions and doing their part . no were to be seen .
listen to R BACON
TANKER
- 30 Aug 2013 08:52
- 28383 of 81564
assad did not use the gas it was terrorists and the CAMERON AND BARMY WANT TO ARM THE TERRORISTS WHY
TANKER
- 30 Aug 2013 08:53
- 28384 of 81564
why are CAMERON AND BARMY SUPPORTING TERRORISTS WHAT IS BEHIND THIS ACTION
Fred1new
- 30 Aug 2013 09:06
- 28385 of 81564
Perhaps, the Arab League is more reflective especially as it is closer to their homes.
There seems a general way to change what is happening in Syria and REGIME CHANGE.
(It is bloody stupid not to accept this and hypocrisy or lying to say that this is not the ultimate aim.)
The problem is how to do it, avoiding the probability of increasing the death toll and destruction of infrastructure and the cost of supporting a destroyed "social" structure and avoiding replacement of government with what we think "worse".
Also, if we "invade" Syria (sending in missiles is and invasion) we have to accept responsibility for the peace and that means "feet" or more "feet" on the "ground".
This is why it is necessary to try and develop an "international armed police force" under the jurisdiction of the United Nation in one way or another to intervene effectively in future areas.
HOW????????
skinny
- 30 Aug 2013 09:08
- 28386 of 81564
Utopia - will never happen!
TANKER
- 30 Aug 2013 09:23
- 28387 of 81564
RICHARD BACON has given all the answers the ARAB LEAGUE should take the lead role then we could support them
but alas we know they will do nothing they want the christen countrys to do their dirty work
the silence from all these muslim leaders speaks VOLUMES are they MUTE
and can only speak to attack the west
TANKER
- 30 Aug 2013 09:23
- 28388 of 81564
would like the answer to the question
doodlebug4
- 30 Aug 2013 09:26
- 28389 of 81564
Paddy Pantsdown on Sky News this morning looked like he was about to burst into tears and talking drivel - along the lines of what was the point now in having a military force in this country.
TANKER
- 30 Aug 2013 09:28
- 28390 of 81564
countries against the uk
Russia
iran
Pakistan
india
china
yemin
Egypt
Iraq
afgan
and many more
and we know why
TANKER
- 30 Aug 2013 09:30
- 28391 of 81564
doodle . and he says he is a lib he is a bloody liar he is greedy man filling is pockets
like the rest of the libs liars
TANKER
- 30 Aug 2013 09:34
- 28392 of 81564
58% of Germany against the west taken action on Syria