Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

That's the Wonder of Woolworths, da, da da, da, daa............. (WLW)     

ringos_tar_2000 - 11 May 2004 12:22

Anyone notice the exratordinary volumes yesterday? (10/5/2004)

48 million!!!

Many more buys than sells.

That and the price held out only losing a fraction of a penny.

No Easter Eggs in sight in my local store.

May be one reason but............

Any ideas people?

seawallwalker - 14 Apr 2005 06:50 - 286 of 344

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000102&sid=aStfoiIge7Uc&refer=uk

This link may help people save money if they bail this morning first thing.

It says APAX have pulled out.

Woolworth bid dropped
MoneyAM
The future of Woolworths has been questioned after venture capitalist Apax dropped its bid.

The financial group cited concerns over "key cash items".

Apax had offered 837m, or 52.8 pence for every Woolworth share, but withdrew the bid late on Wednesday after having been given access to the firm's books.

Analysts said that the decision is likely to hit Woolworths shares when the market opens in London on Thursday.

Woolworths played down concerns, saying it was a "big, profitable" company.

Speaking to the Financial Times, Woolworths chairman Gerald Corbett said that "it is very difficult dealing with venture capitalists".

"We thought our shareholders would want us to explore" the 58p a share bid, Mr Corbett explained. "We have explored it, but they've withdrawn and so it is back to business as usual."

"We are a big, profitable, cash-generative business."

Analysts were less optimistic and said that there have been concerns over Woolworths and its business model for a number of years.

Last month, Woolworths said retail conditions remain "difficult" after reporting a 1.3% fall in like-for-like sales during 2004.

Justin Urquhart-Stewart of Seven Investment Management said that Woolworths was one of a number of ailing UK retailers.

The problem facing Woolworths, he continued, was that the company did not have a very clear role to play on the High Street and consumers were unsure what exactly it offered.

Apax declined to comment on what problems there were, saying only that they related to "key cash items".

"It is significant," said Seven's Urquhart-Stewart, adding that investors will be worrying about the venture capital firm has uncovered.

"What has Apax found?"

Analysts speculated that there may have been some unseen problems or costs related to Woolworths real-estate portfolio and plans to sell of its remaining Big W stores.


Good luck.

seawallwalker - 14 Apr 2005 07:46 - 287 of 344

It does not bode well, over 2 million sales pre open at 40p now 39p.

Can anyone tell me how these early trades happen?

babykitcat - 14 Apr 2005 07:57 - 288 of 344

i would love to see share register and see how many friends/employees sold shares yesterday INSIDERTRADING YESTERDAY MY ASS so you telling me at 8pm ish apax only just decided they were not going to bid yet at these time most sensible people are at home with the family this stinks!!!!

daves dazzlers - 14 Apr 2005 07:58 - 289 of 344

Sw,you would hope people would of cashed in well before after all its been in the up 50s for some time now,why would they still keep hold of them prior to an exchange of all the paper work.

daves dazzlers - 14 Apr 2005 08:00 - 290 of 344

After all look at the sells on wensaday.

daves dazzlers - 14 Apr 2005 08:10 - 291 of 344

No small position holders left in here,,lucky sods!

babykitcat - 14 Apr 2005 08:12 - 292 of 344

come on wlw u can do it 30p

seawallwalker - 14 Apr 2005 11:29 - 293 of 344

I agree with respect to the heavy trades yesterday even.

Tons of sells.

seawallwalker - 14 Apr 2005 14:23 - 294 of 344

280 million changed hands today.

Most are buys.

Maybe there is a reason for that?

New lurker?

At around 40p it is not a bargain imo.

daves dazzlers - 14 Apr 2005 15:15 - 295 of 344

Agree sw but 30 pence would be.Plenty of talk of 26p a week or 2 before apex came on the scene.

proptrade - 14 Apr 2005 16:44 - 296 of 344

a lot of money lost in this stock. hedgies would have been all over it for the 3p flip (great performance annualised - eg. 55 to 58.2p roughly 5% over lets say 3 months = 20% annualised!). big gapping wounds today....

seawallwalker - 14 Apr 2005 16:52 - 297 of 344

Hmm........

Yes prop.

Not good for anyone really.

In hope now that Trevor is allowed to get on with his recovery of the WLW business without distraction.

Dave I think 26 p will never be seen again.

A simple lowering ogf the base rate(!) will do the trick.

Its that simple.

Enter the Consevative Government.

seawallwalker - 15 Apr 2005 08:04 - 298 of 344

Speculators did not clean up at Woolies (Robert Cole) Times Business)


At 41p Woolies looks excellent value. Buy; Rolls-Royce shares offer sound value. Hold; SSL International's p/e ratio is 19 and dividend yield only 2 per cent.

http://business.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,8211-1570395,00.html

Nice positive item regarding long term prospects.

daves dazzlers - 15 Apr 2005 08:29 - 299 of 344

Its still a winner for me sw long term,,touch wood and the horse shoe and the bunny foot.
I will stick to my target of 26 if it comes off great.

seawallwalker - 19 Apr 2005 15:18 - 300 of 344

Looks today like intstutions are selling out, p[robably what they bought while the negatiations were under way, so they are taking a hit.

It will affect the price, but dave...................26p????

I dont think so.

Look at around 36p and sell off in 4 years at around 90p to a pound is what I think.

The divi will be reinstated now by the way, so............ take that into account on the price.

stockbunny - 19 Apr 2005 15:25 - 301 of 344

No - not Woolies....must be strong, no more retailers, no
adding to the portfolio, no more bargain basement buys, not until
I get rid of FCCN, must resist.......

(phew that was close, it all got very tempting for a minute)

Seriously, it's sad really I like Woolies.....oh and Dave, it's ok
you can put my foot down now - cheers me-dear
;>)

seawallwalker - 19 Apr 2005 15:36 - 302 of 344

It's been good to me, so I am sentimental, and will probably buy back in again, only this time keep them.

They will find the focus I think, and I bet they eventually take Tesco over in the future.

Will it be before the latest aseroid hits in 2036?

Well I can not answer that as I probably wont be around then.

Be warned, if I am, I will look like Mr Burns.

"Smithers......................."

stockbunny - 19 Apr 2005 15:39 - 303 of 344

LOL :>)

daves dazzlers - 19 Apr 2005 15:39 - 304 of 344

26,

You heard it here first,fight the urge,,,,,,,,,,,,fight the urge!!

gavdfc - 19 Apr 2005 15:48 - 305 of 344

It seems that even that Evil character now owns Woolies and didn;t take Dave's advice to fight that urge!

"On the other hand I have hoovered up 1 million shares in Woolworths (WLW) at 39p as I think the market over-reacted to the Apax bid withdrawal and I can see another stalker emerging in due course. I see that Nick Bubb disagrees with me and he is the retail guru but then he does read the Guardian so he can't get everything right."
Register now or login to post to this thread.