Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

hamas are a terrorist org fact they are murderers
and the Palestinians voted for terrorists to take charge
hamas leaders have bought hundreds of houses out side of
Palestine for their retreat as they will hamas for retirement
the are the terrorists mafia filling their boots to a life of luxury
the Palestinians can not see the wood for the forest

Hama's are freedom fighters and Israel are the terrorists.

hamas freedom fighters what bloody planet are you on . if any Palestine speaks out they are killed they are to scared to speak

Don't believe Israeli propaganda.

will not post to you again you are a terrorist lover
and all on this thread now know you are

.

How sweet those words are, "will not post to you again".

Mark,

It seems a little sad for the Unions action, but it would be better if individuals union members signed "authority" for Union to collect political "donations" and pass them to "chosen" party machinery without any discrimination.

I know when I was employed by NCB 50+ years ago during vacations that I had 3p? a week deducted from my wage packet.

Also, it will be sad, if unions become apolitical, (if that is possible), as the often they represent those in society who sometimes don't have the attributes to do so for themselves, or the necessary "muscle".

It seems time that political funding for parties to be addressed.

It will be daft if it the UK becomes like the USA, or different groups can purchase power on basis of present "personal" wealth.

Hays,

If you only meant it I would send you a Xmas card.


8-)

Meant what?

The majority of Labour party money comes from individual donations.

McCain won't support Obama at present. It is because he wants Syria hit much harder with more involvement of the US with air strikes as well.

Then I am thankful he is not the President of the USA and that Obama is.

Why does America have to stick it's nose in?

The other Arab nations have more than enough military assets to do the job themselves.

With the armaments Syria is said to have I have a "feeling" that it would be a more bloody confrontation, leading to greater unrest and polarisation.


Possibly, the cost in life may be greater.

Also, USA may fear that they may get the taste and have another go at Israel.

Also, the ME appears to be a tinder box and in one way USA may hope that it dampening down the area and remain on side.

Wouldn't like to make the decisions.

I am glad Cameron is sticking to shooting badgers.

At least with badgers you know they can't shoot back and you don't get your soldiers coming back home in body bags.

thankfully, and it is probably reciprocated, I have been divorced from this board for the last week, but I wonder if Gromit will end up being bitten on the bum through his politically-driven stance last week

it is certainly interesting that even russia's public stance is now manoeuvring itself so that it can actually support - or at least take a neutral stance with regard to - america's almost inevitable action

How are the arms dealing shares doing lately in the US, anyone know?

For you Tory Tarts who want to bring back hanging, have a read of this.. and then if you still don't get it try reading it again.. a bit slower perhaps http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-beds-bucks-herts-21412241