Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

THE TALK TO YOURSELF THREAD. (NOWT)     

goldfinger - 09 Jun 2005 12:25

Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

cynic - 11 Sep 2013 11:57 - 29191 of 81564

fred - would you vote for raising taxes, probably significantly? ..... or would still choose to sit on the sidelines and pontificate as usual? :-)

Haystack - 11 Sep 2013 11:58 - 29192 of 81564

He would vote for not voting.

Fred1new - 11 Sep 2013 12:02 - 29193 of 81564

Cynic.

It depends on how the data is specified and then correlated.

Then it depends on the periods which one is considering.

If redefinition of entities takes place then it depends of the regrouping of the entities.

One of my daughter is an "analyst" in government department and another one in University research dept.

Both are fed up with the slovenly collection of data, and uncorrelated "deductions" being made from that data.

Falsification.

-----

Honest Meta Analysis is a different thing.

=====

Haystack - 11 Sep 2013 12:09 - 29194 of 81564

The government doesn't collect or publish the figures. They are all handled by the ONS, which is an independent body. The ONS is not subject to any interference by the government. If the ONS says that unemployment is falling then it is.

MaxK - 11 Sep 2013 12:16 - 29195 of 81564

Who defines "employment"?

Fred1new - 11 Sep 2013 12:17 - 29196 of 81564

Cynic, Hays,

If the labour government had not wasted money on the Iraq War, (which we are now seeing the inherited cost of, in financial and ability to influence) we would have been better off.

If we hadn't been involved in a futile war in Afghanistan and dumped earlier the Subs and Aircraft carriers etc..

If instead of flogging off of major "state own" industries they had had their management improved and unions had been sensible then efficiency, costs and income would have been improved.

Yes I would be in favour of rise in taxation if it improves "social standards" and "well-being" and "quality of life" for society as a whole.

Also, if money hadn't been paid to the banks or they the bankers hadn't been bailed out at extortionate levels, there might have been more money in the kitty.
(A failure of uncontrolled or under regulated capitalism.)

Haystack - 11 Sep 2013 12:27 - 29197 of 81564

Cameron doing a great job at PMQs today. Miliband was limp as usual.

cynic - 11 Sep 2013 12:32 - 29198 of 81564

if, if, if and if your aunt had balls she'ld be your uncle

meanwhile
would you vote for raising taxes, probably significantly? ..... or would still choose to sit on the sidelines and pontificate as usual?

saying "i would be in favour" is a typical fred fudge

hilary - 11 Sep 2013 12:51 - 29199 of 81564

Maybe somebody who isn't sat on the squelchy step should point out to Fishfinger and Old Bollock Chops that denial isn't a river in Egypt.

goldfinger - 11 Sep 2013 12:54 - 29200 of 81564

Fred how on earth can the ONS count a person doing 1 hours work per week be equal to a person doing 39 hours per week, its one big fiddle and not only are the ONS a fiddle they are leaking figures to Osbourne but yet are supposed to be a seperate entity.

In laymans terms...............

Its like Reuters leaking an RNS to a hedge fund manager 24 hours before the market in general get it at 7.00am.

goldfinger - 11 Sep 2013 13:01 - 29201 of 81564

The three Tory BOYS must be miffed today, at PMqs Milly took fat Dave to the cleaners.

As usual cant ever answer a question and turns his head back to his fellow boot lickers for moral support........ mind you that moral support is getting quieter and quieter as time passes going up to the tory annual bash.

I have NEVER EVER known a PM who has lied and is so arrogant as Camoron.

All it takes is labour to hold on the polls at 33% of the vote and they get a majority in the next parliament.

The Tory back benches know this and are getting very very twitchy.

Perhaphs the grusome twosome Cam and Gid think a sell off of Lloyds before the next election will get them out of jail !!!!!! I DONT THINK SO.

cynic - 11 Sep 2013 13:04 - 29202 of 81564

fred and findus - are the pair of you totally unable to read or what?


"It depends on how the data is specified and then correlated"

true, but as i have written twice already, "though the numbers may indeed be skewed by the method used, so long as the same system has been used for say the last 12 months, then the trend if arguably not the number is valid"

skinny - 11 Sep 2013 13:09 - 29203 of 81564

Mubarak-Denial.jpg

skinny - 11 Sep 2013 13:11 - 29204 of 81564

Excellent line from Cameron "he promised us raging bull - he gave us chicken run".

goldfinger - 11 Sep 2013 13:18 - 29205 of 81564

Yep skinny but Wavy Davy forgets he gave us his impression of Raging Bull when he shot of his deckchair in Cornwall? flew into parliament with his fists flying over Syria and ended up with a bloody nose and his tail between his legs.

Haystack - 11 Sep 2013 13:20 - 29206 of 81564

gf
Miliband was hopeless at PMQs.

I found two very interesting pieces of information came out of PMQs.

1. Food bank use multiplied 10 times under Labour.

2. Job Centres were blocked from referring claimants to food banks as it would have been bad pr for the Labour government. That block has been removed, which is possibly why their use has increased.

Fred1new - 11 Sep 2013 13:42 - 29207 of 81564

Cynic,

Rubbish.

Read the answer and try and dyoh.

---------
Hays.

1. Food bank use multiplied 10 times under Labour.

Compare the levels they are at now with labour's period.


You are learning from your idol Cameron how distort figures.

==================

Hays,

Heard somebody say he passed a Cameron and feels less constipated now.

--------------
Is Hils pining for a bit of Welsh Ram again?
-------

aldwickk - 11 Sep 2013 13:46 - 29208 of 81564

Anybody who rapes someone deserves a rather unprintable penalty but I think the pendulum has swung too far - it's now far too easy for a woman to cry wolf”
End Quote
Christine Hamilton

After the failure of the Police and other's in the Jimmy Savile case among others , there seem's to be a catch up witch hunt by the police , these case's are being bought to trail without any forensic evidence what so ever .

Fred1new - 11 Sep 2013 13:48 - 29209 of 81564

Hays,

Explain images such as these if all is well!




Is that you sneaking out of the food bank?

goldfinger - 11 Sep 2013 13:53 - 29210 of 81564

LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL

Fred Ive got hays on filter but its obvious what the mug is missing in his statistics.

Under Labour food banks were at a minimum, ie their was hardly any about, under the Torries they are becoming common place as is pay day lenders and charity shops.

It doesnt take a genious to figure out 10 times at nearly zero is obviously bigger %wise than the present figure.

Again Camoron misleading with statistis and telling lies.

How do they sleep at night????

Register now or login to post to this thread.