mitzy
- 15 Sep 2008 11:16
Today they have fallen 22% to a new low of 223p ..are they another Marconi..?
The chart looks like one long suicide note.
Clubman3509
- 30 Sep 2008 14:19
- 292 of 569
Or send his Saudi mates round to have a word with them.
mysunshine
- 30 Sep 2008 15:48
- 293 of 569
If short selling isn't allowed on Financial Stocks why is Paulson still being allowed to short HBOS? I'm confused.
Regulatory Announcement
Company Paulson & Co. Inc.
TIDM
Headline Short Selling Disclosure- HBOS PLC
Released 15:06 30-Sep-08
Number 7196E15
RNS Number : 7196E
Paulson & Co. Inc.
30 September 2008
TR-4 :
Disclosure of Short Position relating to UK Financial Sector Company
1. Full name of person(s) holding the disclosable short position :Paulson & Co. Inc.
2: Name of the issuer of the relevant securities HBOS PLC
3: Disclosable short position 0.95%
4. Date that disclosable short position was held
29 September 2008
cynic
- 30 Sep 2008 15:52
- 294 of 569
i think they are not forced to close but are obligated (not obliged!) to make daily returns to show position
spitfire43
- 30 Sep 2008 15:53
- 295 of 569
I think you will find that Paulson had been left with a short position somewhat higher when ban was introduced, but managed to buy hbos yesterday, which lowered the position. They also did the same with lloy yesterday.
mysunshine
- 30 Sep 2008 16:01
- 296 of 569
Thanks for replies. I thought all short positions had to be closed on the day it was announced and that no more shorting whatsoever was allowed. So the HBOS shares can still be manipulated down.
I do hope Lloyds can have nothing to do with this. It could be an advantage for them. Of course I am not suggesting anything of the sort.
mitzy
- 30 Sep 2008 16:41
- 297 of 569
another down day if anything Lloyds are looking the best pick of the banks.
spitfire43
- 30 Sep 2008 16:43
- 298 of 569
As I understand it companies that had open short position were not allowed to open any more short position, but were free to close them at any time. So as these position are lowered they are required to report the lower position, so I guess they just took advantage of yesterdays lower prices to lower there exposure.
I believe this is how it works, but I'm happy to be corrected if wrong.
cynic
- 30 Sep 2008 16:47
- 299 of 569
mitzy .... that all depends on this deal between HBOS and LLOY ..... if it stands up on the original terms, then HBOS are ridiculously cheap relative to LLOY
cynic
- 30 Sep 2008 17:19
- 300 of 569
i see that it has been mooted that the deal will be renegotiated to 0.6 instead of 0.83 LLOY shares per HBOS ...... IF that happens to be true AND there is no white knight appearing, then HBOS is priced at approx 10% discount to the offer - generally about right when the time element is built in .... unless LLOY tumbles anew, that makes HBOS quite an attractive and safe punt (or even investment!)
cynic
- 01 Oct 2008 08:01
- 301 of 569
looks like a smart move yesterday ..... thanks mitzy or whoever who reminded me to look again
Clubman3509
- 01 Oct 2008 12:50
- 302 of 569
Wow HBOS up 37% something happening.
nordcaperen
- 01 Oct 2008 15:41
- 303 of 569
Be back above 2.00 tomorrow with Americans vote going the right way - Even I'm leaving my money in today, with stop losses in place of course ! :-)
Clubman3509
- 01 Oct 2008 15:53
- 304 of 569
I think most rises are built in today ahead of any decision from the USA concerning the $700 billion. I hope for you it rises but I have a nasty feeling it has risen to much today ready for a fall Thursday
nordcaperen
- 01 Oct 2008 16:10
- 305 of 569
Still at a discount to Lloyds share offer so should still have a bit of steam in the old girl yet - can see there being a lot of ups and downs to come also, especially over next few months, when the banks lose their court cases on unfair charges - good job it hasn't happened over last couple of weeks or more would go to the wall. Government need to secure all deposits in all the British banks like they have in Ireland ! Go on Gordon,you know it makes sense !
Falcothou
- 01 Oct 2008 16:20
- 306 of 569
Personally think Lloyds is paying well over the odds for HBOS and looks like the market does too. As a commentator said yesterday Lloyds has HBOS over a barrel. Companies with cash are Kings and those with dubious exponential debts are not.. The market seems to think that Barclay's got a very good deal cherry picking Lehman's though I would not be happy if I had been a Lehman's bond holder seeing those monstrous bonuses goingh to Lehman's staff, and that Lloyds has got a bad deal with buying HBOS at this rate. Lloyds are supposedly going to need 16 billion to take over this company and it is very risky. They will do well if this is a short recession but if it turns into a depression which looks more likely by the day then they are advised to stay well clear. Lloyds shareholders are not going to be happy about this deal even if it helps save Gordon Brown's bacon
Clubman3509
- 01 Oct 2008 16:53
- 307 of 569
Lloyds have a good deal that they would not have got in normal times because of competition rules. Gorden has greased the right wheels to get this through, so I think it will go through at the agreed price, if they don't GB will send the MI6 and SAS boys round to see them.
maestro
- 01 Oct 2008 17:57
- 308 of 569
heard a rumour tonight of counter 300p bid
Fred1new
- 01 Oct 2008 18:25
- 309 of 569
I thought the price was 500p. Different pub I suppose.
8-)
poo bear
- 01 Oct 2008 19:10
- 310 of 569
Heard a rumour these were 9 odd once.........
In today for some.
Thank you very much.
cynic
- 01 Oct 2008 19:46
- 311 of 569
i would have thought that the odds of this deal completing (or just possibly via a white knight) are strongly in favour - i.e. >85% ..... certainly HBOS's sp movement indicates that, and i for one am absolutely delighted and care not if it finished well off its highs ..... not sure if i would have taken (any) profits during the day had i been around