Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

SubSea Resources PLC (SUB)     

Andy - 20 May 2006 20:50

big.chart?symb=uk%3Asub&compidx=aaaaa%3A


I have been reading about Subsea resources, and I will be keeping an eye on the stock, as their first salvage operation is imminent, and it will be interesting to see what level of sucess they can achieve, measured against their expectations.



SubSea Resources has been formed to salvage cargoes from cargo ships that have been lost in deep water. Only a handful of wrecks have been salvaged in water depths exceeding 1000 metres, whereas hundreds have been worked on in depths down to 300 metres. The barrier to deeper work has been a lack of technology, which is now available mainly due to developments in the offshore oil and gas industry.

Sonar scan of wreck

SubSea Resources has identified at least 70 commercial salvage targets and has identified twenty major target vessels containing cargoes with a gross value of over $450 million (based on recent LME metal prices and contemporary lading records). In the first phase of the companys business plan it aims to raise the cargoes from six of these vessels over the next three years.


In addition, it is anticipated that certain historic cargoes may be integrated with the commercial salvage operations. Some of the historic targets have potential values of many millions of dollars each, bringing the combined value of identified historic and commercial targets to well over $1 billion.




Initial Salvage Targets

SubSea Resources has an initial programme to salvage the cargos of six commercial wrecks in the period to 31 March 2008. The gross value of these six wrecks is estimated at US$180 million.

The wrecks allow for a mix of weather conditions - allowing for both northern summer and winter working conditions. All wrecks are in international waters and all of the cargoes will be recovered through contracts with the legal owners. The water depths range from below 1500 meters to 5000+ meters.




Corporate website : http://www.subsearesources.com/index.php

smiler o - 28 Mar 2007 19:38 - 292 of 382

ST will let you know what we find :)

smiler o - 29 Mar 2007 14:42 - 293 of 382

SubSea Resources PLC
29 March 2007

SubSea Resources plc.

(AIM: SUB)

29 March 2007



Notification of major interests in shares



SubSea Resources plc ('the Company') announces that it received notification on
23 March 2007 that FMR Corp is indirectly interested in 9,684,725 Ordinary
Shares of 5p each in the capital of the Company representing 4.6 per. cent. of
the Company's issued share capital. The notification states that FMR Corp acts
as nominee for Mellon Bank N A.




This information is provided by RNS
The company news service from the London Stock Exchange


soul traders - 29 Mar 2007 17:04 - 294 of 382

Nice to see the big boys buying. Talking of which, have you seen IMY? up over 150% in a month on institutional buying.

cynic - 29 Mar 2007 21:12 - 295 of 382

hangon ..... you don't have e-mail so this is the only way to respond .... thank you, or at least i think it was a compliment .... merely try to have some fun with words, be slightly facetious but with some underlying common sense!

soul traders - 30 Mar 2007 12:25 - 296 of 382

Morning all. forget what I said about IMY - the takeover offer was for far less than the current SP, hence today's drop!

smiler o - 30 Apr 2007 09:31 - 297 of 382

OSLO (Thomson Financial) - Aker Kvaerner ASA said it has been awarded a contract for a subsea tie-in system project in Brazil by Norwegian peer Subsea 7 Inc, in a deal worth 4 mln usd.

Under the terms of the deal, Aker Kvaerner it will provide a retrievable tee structure and vertical connection system to the underwater project at the Camarupim Field, in Brazil's Espirito Santo basin, part of Petrobras's Plangas

Program.

( If only it was our one )

soul traders - 30 Apr 2007 09:39 - 298 of 382

It's not the same Subsea, Smiler.

smiler o - 30 Apr 2007 09:47 - 299 of 382

: ( THERE was also one called Deep6 but it sank !!, ST may here something in May ?

canada1 - 10 May 2007 14:33 - 300 of 382

4p!!, 1,350,00 down the pan for listening to directors bullshit, shudda been a "feel good" share, a company delivering the cargos that so many men lost their lives trying to deliver.

hangon - 10 May 2007 15:11 - 301 of 382

4p is fast-approaching it seems as more punters leave the sinking stock. What is surprisiing is that the Mkt Cap is shown as 7m - yet I'm trying to remember if they had any meaningful T/O - do I recall some zinc was lifted? (odd metal to find, as I'd have thought the sea would have fast-corroded it).
Was this co ever a go-er . . . or were Directors in posession of a great wheeze of an idea and sold it to innocent punters (and the Banks! using our money).

Pity the punters.

canada1 - 10 May 2007 15:19 - 302 of 382

They con-vinced the government as well, the war graves commission and me, nice as pie at 14p, can't get them on the phone now. I even suggested making a docusoap out of the operations, like "At home with the Osbournes", hlol !!

cynic - 10 May 2007 15:34 - 303 of 382

sorry for any guys who bought into this company ...... will admit i said from the outset it was one to avoid though fun to watch from the outside ..... sunken treasure always sounds great .... and i daren't continue that old chestnut on this site!

canada1 - 10 May 2007 15:42 - 304 of 382

Sorry cynic, it's got nothing to do with sunken treasure, the navy always knew where the ships had gone down, they just couldn't decide whether they were war graves or not, subsea was supposed to be the first company allowed to salvage, hence the licences.

cynic - 10 May 2007 15:51 - 305 of 382

was always a dodgy enterprise with very high inherent risk ..... sorry to say, but the guys do not seem to have ever had the necessary capital unless all went well from Day 1

canada1 - 10 May 2007 16:17 - 306 of 382

Yes, I agree, that's why I said they must have conned the government to get the licences, the navy reckon the process to get licences is very rigid and all contractors have to prove total liqidity.

smiler o - 12 May 2007 13:08 - 307 of 382

Diving deep
Last Updated: 3:03am BST 12/05/2007



Market report
SubSea Resources, the salvage specialist that recovers high-value metals and other valuable cargoes from deep-water ship wrecks, saw its shares sink a further 6pc after its former managing director sold 500,000 shares in the company.


The sale reduces Mark Gleaves holding to 6.3m shares, or 3pc of the company. He stepped down from the board in December, when the company placed 78.5m shares at 10p.

The disposal comes only days after the company announced, following a comprehensive review of the business, that it was very actively and urgently considering new potential business models and associated funding opportunities. SubSea floated on Aim in November 2004 at 20p and rose to a high of 39p last year.

However, the company has since had problems, including locating a 19th century bullion wreck codenamed Ella. The company said this week that it was confident of SubSeas operational potential. Yesterday the shares slipped a further to a new all-time low of 4p.

seawallwalker - 12 Jun 2007 07:39 - 308 of 382

Proposed placing.

canada1 - 12 Jun 2007 08:35 - 309 of 382

Bu**er, might as well hang on for the next fundraiser at 1p.

hangon - 14 Jun 2007 15:22 - 310 of 382

They have raised some 4.4 million at 3p so this should underpin the sp at least until they reorganise the share-capital - whatever that means, this is because the current price is below the face-val;ue of the shares....so what?
Also Mark Gleave has sold his remaining holding, so presumably that was about 3-3.5p and draws a conclusion over his shareholding. Not sure whether this means the co is sound-enough, but it's a bitter pil for those that bought at higher prices when the smell of salty metals hit the Markets.
At this price(3.5p) it may be worth a punt, but am unsure about the share-reorganisation as I suspect Retail Investors will miss out...who else?

cynic - 14 Jun 2007 15:25 - 311 of 382

don't touch this with a bargepole unless you are desperate to lose money ...... if they get themselves up and running again, unlikely as that may be, then still restrict yourself to watching only
Register now or login to post to this thread.