Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

You mean the successes of the "West's" democracy intervention in the dictatorships of other countries and getting rid of WMD and Chemical Weapons of War, but holding on to their own supplies.

Influencing the policies of other countries by example.


UMMMMMMMMMMH,

Funny market.

My tiddlers are up and my larger holdings are down.

Im told Haystack is making it up as he goes how conduct re- bulletin board posts.

Haystack ......the boss here bullshare and Ian keep a very close watch on this thread.

Dont think for one minute you can post anything ........you cannot. Their are limits........


E mailed to me....... Haystack - 12 Sep 2013 14:00 - 29306 of 29320

People on here can contribute anyway that they wish. They can interrupt, make comments, join in conversations whether invited or not. There are no rules here. It is very difficult to insult me. I only regard myself as insulted if I have a good opinion of the person attempting the insult.

As landlord of the thread I wish to inform ALL there are RULES and please all of us lets be civilised and stick to them.

We dont want posters being banned.

Even if we dont agree with others we should allow them their right to post.

Lets be cool.

fred - was 29321 meant for my consumption as it seems to be a non seq?


btw, did anyone watch The Wipers Times last night?

gf
There is no such thing as a landlord of a thread.

Of course the post was not emailed to you. It is quite clear that you read the posters you claim to have filtered. You seem far too vain to miss a post that might mention you.

I've recorded it - is it worth a watch?

cynic
The wipers times was possibly the most interesting, enjoyable bits of viewing seen for a long time. BBC at its best.

yes skinny; it was excellent and without the usual "horror" pix of most progs of those times

stage version of "warhorse" was also brilliant in all sorts of ways

Cynic,

No. just cast into the air.

==========
I did watch The Wipers Times".

I thought it was a good production and represented WW1 and the detachment and often "superiority" sometimes shown by those who thought they knew better.

Also, related the total incompetence of some of the military elite.

Also, if you look at that period you can see the reasons for the emerging strength and bloody mindedness of the unions in twenties, thirties and carried on post WW2 into 70 and 80s.

Well worth watching and humour took the bitterness out of the situation.

Reminded me of last episode of Black Adder and Memoirs of a Fox-Hunting Man by Siegfried Sassoon.

Pointing out the stupidity of war.

But WW1 did change the structure of the UK.

yes it did, as incidentally did the Black Death, and to a lesser extent, the likes of the Dissolution of the Monasteries and the Civil War

going back to 29321, you are a naughty boy trying to pin "blame" exclusively on the West, and you damn well know it
do i need to expand? .... i'm sure not

btw, what are you holding that is large and expanding?
please don't frighten the horses

I see the Royal Mail union is balloting for a strikes bcauseof likely privatisation.

I fail see what business it is of the Royal Mail employees if it is to be privatised. They may well not like it but it is none of their business. There may well be job losses in the persuit of efficiency but that is probably a good thing. The unions have this misguided view that people have a right to a job. The reality is that the only right is the right to be left alone.

Have you considered dropping dead lately H/S?

I agree - looks like they are afraid to loose their jobs. They do not own Royal Mail, in fact these days they are lucky to have a job, probably with a pension as well.
It looks to me like the Govt want to off load Royal Mail, and its related problems on some shareholders - OK, but I am not going to buy any shares and pick up government problems. I like to sleep easy.

Stan - what is your reasoned argument - why should H/S drop dead ? It seems to me like he has a very promising future ahead of him ?

It was a question not an argument rk.

Stan - does H/S presently have a health problem that is terminal ?
I now feel sorry for him

No one sends letters anymore. The future is parcels. It needs to be run on a commercial footing with investment. Privatisation is the only realistic solution. There should be no businesses that are run by the state. The alternative is creeping socialism. That goes for the NHS as well.

psittacosis if one of his earlier sobriquets is anything to go by :-)

"Stan - does H/S presently have a health problem that is terminal ?
I now feel sorry for him"

... Unfortunately I don't think so rk -):

Post 29329

I would not risk comparison.

-----------
Hays,

With such a bright bunch of fellows in cabinet, and with their obvious management skills, (as seen by the recent vote in the HP) and apparent incompetence of the present management of the Royal Mail, why doesn't Cameron donate one of his cabinet chums to reorganise and improve the "administration" and "efficiency" of the "utility".

Then it could put the "profits" to use paying off the "National Debt" it is continuing to accumulate.

--------------------------

Or are you hoping the supposed £3 billion raised will be paid out in reduction of tax on higher earners" and encourage them to spend more overseas.


-------------

I think it is time to bring back the work houses, that will teach the lazy buggers.


Perhaps, the local hospital near you can have a new ward named "Expeditious Euthanasia Parlour". It could be used improved the speed and efficiency of the birth to burial procedure.

Wonder what the profit margin would be.

cynic is not a relation of mine. Anyway he is a cut ahead of me.