Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

Tadpole Evolves (TAD)     

ainsoph - 23 May 2003 13:32

A new thread that may swim in hibernation for a few days or weeks as the process of evolution takes place ......

Imagine a slimmed down debt free company with one division stacked with orders and self financing with cash in the bank.

Then imagine a partner for the other division with pockets so deep that they could fund a rocket to the moon ..... and back

Dreaming of course but Tads can do that to you ..... what a gem or is that a bygone dream as well .....


ainsoph


We started the day at 4.75p mid - risk grade 583 - currently 6p - spamming posts 63 out of 140

superrod - 30 May 2003 21:25 - 294 of 729

bullie
can you elaborate?....aliases seem to be a hot topic since i joined financial websites. ( several years ago ) its not something that particularly bothers me as they are generally identifiable by their style of posting/grammar etc. i also believe its a convenient cubby hole for certain posters to take refuge with their snide/un-informative/digs.

although a FAR superior site to advfn :o) certain peeps persist in calling anyone who is pro tad an alias of ainsoph.
take the bull by the horns......one strike and yuo are OUT. then MAM will be the place to BE.

all in mho of course

superrod - 30 May 2003 21:28 - 295 of 729

thanks densil
saved me getting out my janet and john books LOL

superrod - 30 May 2003 21:33 - 296 of 729

ps olie
arent you amazed at my willpower not answering your thread? trust me....tad at least 15p in a month

Densil - 30 May 2003 21:36 - 297 of 729

You picked up all the points then superrod?

superrod - 30 May 2003 21:42 - 298 of 729

errr
i think so
was yours a cryptic post?

Densil - 30 May 2003 22:06 - 299 of 729

It was the brambles superrod.
Thats what made me think of this bb. Brer fox - Neo/Oily thinking he's so smart and Brer Rabbit -Ains ending up surrounded -surrounded by briars -a lot of little pr*cks.
But still covered in tar because, even if you wriggle out, some of its sticks.

iago - 31 May 2003 08:32 - 300 of 729

Densil - You must be 50 years younger than I imagined.

Can we have a suitable Biggles story next please, im sitting comfortably so you can now begin.

Beau62 - 31 May 2003 08:38 - 301 of 729

Bullshare

"Its funny how people try and sneak in under the radar. It actually brings home just how many aliases posters actually had when denying they had any. We have 'interesting 'technology' to help us."

I welcome any technology that removes aliases and await any further news and advice on this. Keep up the good work and this site will become far superior to any other, including iii because there are loads of aliases and posters with hidden agendas over there, just like Advfn.

Superrod

"although a FAR superior site to advfn :o) certain peeps persist in calling anyone who is pro tad an alias of ainsoph."

I agree that some of the threads are excellent, here, and very informative too.

However, it does fall on the other foot, superrod, I was called an alias of the "bits and pieces" by a certain poster and I am far from anti-Tad. Advfn, iii, Fool and MoneyAm would be able to confirm I am not, quite easily here and now (I only use one name) and should I be lying I would expect to be contradicted accordingly by the moderators immediately. Just posting because there is two sides to every argument.

Besides, I understand TT is purchasing another computer with, if I am right, a new IP address. I guess he will be back here before we know it. Obviously I may be wrong, but I am entitled to my opinion. That is why credit card registration is absolutely necessary, because unless you have a dodgy credit card, you cannot lie about your name and address.

Just so as you get this absolutely right. I am pro Tad, am long and want Tad to succeed. My only failing was to disagree with a certain poster, once or twice, based on my complete dissatisfaction of the way Tad was/is being directed. I want news of deals and orders, an end of Gem, a profitable and strategically sound alliance/partnership with ETI just like everyone does. I may believe that Tad will be 20p someday or hope for more, but I have no substance to work on that allows me to say that, via a ramp, or an alias or any other mechanism.

Please accept I am not patronising you here. Just airing my views as politely as I can and, obviously honestly.

Have a good weekend all (sadly, I'm working today and tomorrow).

Beau





Sequestor - 31 May 2003 12:20 - 302 of 729

Would Densil, Tris ,Superrod and the two or three other moaners about posts /aliases etc. care to confirm that they have a credit card ID, via an account with the MA team, I have,
If not please register one immediately in order that we can ascertain who is whom!

Tris - 31 May 2003 15:35 - 303 of 729

Persistant oily Ill give you that!
Would your motive be to discredit yet more contributors to man?
Listen up oily get closereadyI am Tris nobody else OK.Mam can or could confirm that. They only have to asknot sure this would suit you though in your many guises, which come and go!
Why persist oily, you got your way lol.... now run along wee chap, pester elsewhere.

Sequestor - 31 May 2003 17:00 - 304 of 729

Trish Trash
I asked a simple question, as ever the "team" have to attempt to insult any they think may be trying to outwit them, very odd,and me asking if you do pay is discreditable?, very ,very odd, I was answering Beaus` post actually, and incidentally when the time is reached to have to ask a fool like you permission to post, I won`t bother ta.
You will give me what for being `persistent`?-your permission, you`ll give me that?, butt out.
So we can take it that you are a paying guest then ? excellent, I look forward to you opening a TAD thread in the traders room.
As beau said above credit card registration is essential, I commend it.

Sequestor - 31 May 2003 17:07 - 305 of 729

Sequestor - 31 May'03 - 17:02 - 5 of 5 edit



Be patient Tris is coming from the free bb to explain.

----------------------------------
Doors have been opened Tish Trash, now is your chance in the Traders Room to show your metal

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Polka on

Densil - 31 May 2003 20:25 - 306 of 729

Sorry iago end everyone, I was a bit pissd and thinking sideways. Made some subconscious connections to an old story.

Sequestor - 31 May 2003 20:33 - 307 of 729

Dense!!!!!!!!!

Densil - 31 May 2003 21:13 - 308 of 729

Sequestoe, if you're replying to me, don't bother because you're on my squelch list. Nothing personal but I'm not interested in your views.

Moneylender - 31 May 2003 21:25 - 309 of 729

nice one densil


M

Densil - 31 May 2003 22:08 - 310 of 729

Moneylender, Where have all the Gem shares gone?
I only bought a few.

Moneylender - 31 May 2003 22:34 - 311 of 729

Densil.

Not sure I can answer that. Ask Mr Caplin, he is supposed to look after
our interests.

Mind you he is a shareholder now, perhaps he is looking after his own interest.

A leopard never changes his spots

M

Moneylender - 31 May 2003 23:00 - 312 of 729

IEQ to be wound-up, litigation will continue
Scheme set up to assist liquidators recoveries for creditors and shareholders against former directors

Athens Greece -- (OfficialSpin.com) -- 28/05/03 -- IEQ PLC today announced that the Company would be wound-up following a Petition being pursued by its managing director, Greg Lloyd Smith. Lloyd Smith, who, with his wife, is one of the largest creditors of the Company, sought the Petition as a method of assisting with the Company's two lawsuitsclaiming more than 3 millionagainst a number of former directors and one adviser.

Current insolvency legislation allows directors of failed companies to be pursued in the courts for recovery of money where there has been negligence, misconduct or misappropriation of assets. However, all too often liquidators cannot pursue actions because of lack of funding.

Under the civil recovery scheme The Insolvency Service and a team of private sector insolvency specialists known as the Forensic Insolvency Recovery Service ("FIRS") work together to take legal action against directors in appropriate cases. The legal action is on a no-win-no-fee basis.

The scheme aims to deter directors from abusing the privilege of limited liability, and to obtain a return to creditors.

IEQ PLC recognised that the FIRS programme would assist in connection with the company's ongoing litigation:

-- IEQ PLC v. Sir Richard Needham, others, Case No. HC02-C00065
-- IEQ PLC v. John Shaw, others, Case No. HC03-C01527

The full list of defendants are:
Sir Richard Needham
Anthony Caplin
John MacKay
John Shaw (two lawsuits)
Christopher Foster
Seymour Pierce Private Equity Limited
Jonathan Wright
EMCEE Nominees Limited
Memery Crystal Solicitors
The first case involves significant breaches of fiduciary duty by the former directors that resulted in the loss of more than 3 million in shareholder funds. The second case involves the very basis upon which IEQ obtained its certificate of trading and admission to AIM and includes the companys former solicitors,

Moneylender - 31 May 2003 23:08 - 313 of 729

Bust week for Caplin:

The six defendants project more than 700k in costs to defend the claims being made by IEQthrough to trial, which is currently scheduled for the week beginning 3 June 2003.

http://www.officialspin.com/
Register now or login to post to this thread.