Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

225p per share Cash in Bank. A Shell Co. set to rocket? (LGB)     

robstuff - 19 Aug 2005 11:41

Previously Crown Corp, CCO. Institutional interest now and the Co has changed it's name for a fresh beginning. Still very speculative, but what isn't? but just a case of investing the huge amount of Cash sitting in a Brazilian bank a/c. There's no real difference here to an emerging markets investment fund apart from the obvious and very attractive discount to NAV of approx 75% !!!!!

Fundamentalist - 19 Nov 2005 23:21 - 294 of 373

R33

an interesting post but not 1 personally i give much credence to - ultimately bar 1 or 2 individuals no one knows what is going on and ultimately wont until the suspension is lifted (if it even is).

I have read some of your posts across the way and respect a lot of what you say but ultimately feel that if this was ultimately worth what a lot of people seem to think then why were so few institutions interested at 1/4 of supposed NAV.

Surely the more feasible answer is that Rybak was simply getting out what he could before it went belly up.

Hopefully i am wrong on this because ultimately nearly all the exposure is with small private investors ( i have no probs with seeing the institutions shafted!!!) - i have no position mainly because it just felt too good to be true

PS good luck with the champ investor comp - slightly frustrating seeing you and polaris ahead of me knowing that most of your gains are also coming from SKP (as are mine)

Dr Square - 21 Nov 2005 08:02 - 295 of 373

forensic accountants named in below Kroll

Small Talk: Revealed... colourful past of the Baltic Barracuda
By Michael Jivkov and Stephen Foley
Published: 21 November 2005
http://news.independent.co.uk/business/analysis_and_features/article328257.ece

After last week's piece about Langbar International, AIM's biggest cash shell, Small Talk was inundated with calls asking for more information on the company's founder Mariusz Rybak. It was his 2.5m share sale that prompted Langbar stock to be suspended last month and a team of forensic accountants called in from Kroll to find out once and for all just how much cash the company really has.

The latest hoohah at Langbar started when Mr Rybak sold shares at prices between 55p and 65p. This unsettled many investors as the company claims to have more than 220p a share of cash in bank accounts in Brazil and the Netherlands. Although Small Talk could not get in contact with Mr Rybak, former colleagues revealed a colourful business past. The 52-year-old former executive chairman and founder of Langbar is a Canadian citizen who lives in Monaco.

It emerged that his one and a half years at the helm of the group, originally called Crown Corporation, were characterised by a series of disputes with the company's shareholders. The largest of these investors was Lambert Financial, an investment company for some 2,000 Jewish families from all over the world. Led by Dr Abraham Arad, a former adviser to the Israeli Prime Minister's Office, Lambert quickly became dissatisfied with Mr Rybak. An early dispute came over Crown's failure to issue it with the 41 million shares it had bought at the float. This entitled Lambert to a 59 per cent stake in the company.

Lambert, along with the majority of other investors, also became impatient with the lack of action at the company. Although Lambert helped Crown win a series of construction deals in Argentina and Brazil, Mr Rybak never visited the region on the company's behalf. Investors also became concerned at the expenses being run up by the businessman. The most substantial of these was the private jet Mr Rybak had hired on the company's account. Given Crown was still a mere cash shell, it is no surprise that its shareholders viewed such an arrangement as excessive.

In the words of one shareholder: "It was not long after the float that we and others became concerned about the way Mr Rybak ran the company." A further dispute followed when, after one year at Crown's helm, the businessman tried to award himself a significant management fee in addition to the 180,000 per annum salary he received as executive chairman. This request came at a time when Crown still had no operating assets. It was over this issue that the company's broker, Insinger Townsley, resigned in 2004.

Small Talk has been told that Lambert Financial became so concerned about Mr Rybak's activities that it compiled a dossier detailing his actions in the company's name with the help of international authorities.

Mr Rybak settled in Canada during the early 1980s but is originally from the seaport of Gdynia on Poland's Baltic coast. He trained as a scientist, securing a doctorate in environmental engineering from a technology institute near Gdansk. After a number of teaching posts in Canada, he built up a technology firm in Ottawa during the 1990s where he became known as the Baltic Barracuda for his aggressive business style.

After a slew of acquisitions, he floated IDS Intelligent Detection Systems, which specialised in chemical detection technologies, on the Toronto Stock Exchange in 1997. However, he was forced to resign as chief executive of IDS in May 2000 amid mounting losses at the company, which a year later went into receivership. Strangely enough, Crown's 2003 IPO prospectus failed to mention Mr Rybak's stewardship of IDS.


Regards

Dil - 22 Nov 2005 18:49 - 296 of 373

How hard can it be to verify the money is there ???

May I suggest it aint !

andyeds - 23 Nov 2005 14:25 - 297 of 373

dil,

you can suggest what you like...

find out soon enough :-)

petermoran - 23 Nov 2005 15:30 - 298 of 373

I suppose if it wasnt there, then they are taking a long time not finding it??????

Scripophilist - 23 Nov 2005 16:40 - 299 of 373

How long could it possibly take to confirm it or at least issue a message to shareholders. They must have an idea of where it is and how much exists. It does not take six weeks to work it out. I could have rowed to Brazil and rowed back with it in my holdall in six weeks.

Scripophilist - 23 Nov 2005 16:41 - 300 of 373

"I suppose if it wasnt there, then they are taking a long time not finding it?????? "

That's odd logic, if it was there, they should issue an RNS saying don't worry everthing is in hand. They haven't. Look at Enron such a complicated set of affairs to shield the fact that nothing existed.

Dil - 23 Nov 2005 18:44 - 301 of 373

Andyeds , next you'll be telling me its all in coins and its taking a while to count it !

If it were there they would have said so straight away .... if it aint then they need time to cook up a story.

Place your bets.

Haystack - 25 Nov 2005 08:25 - 302 of 373

Read the RNS!

partridge - 25 Nov 2005 08:28 - 303 of 373

Good call Dil. What is that saying about if something looks too good to be true......

supermono13 - 25 Nov 2005 09:17 - 304 of 373

Another case of the small investor being shafted.
I think holders may have to write this one off.
I'm gathering a posse to look for Rybak

Mono

Bugz - 25 Nov 2005 12:01 - 305 of 373

Langbar International Limited
25 November 2005


Langbar International Limited (the 'Company')

On 12 October 2005 trading in the common shares of the Company was suspended on
AIM pending independent verification of certain of the assets of the Company at
a market capitalisation of approximately 87 million. Following the suspension
the Company appointed Kroll Associates UK Limited ('Kroll'), the international
risk consulting firm, to undertake verification of the Company's cash deposits
('the relevant assets') with Banco do Brasil and ABN Amro BV aggregating some
365 million.

365 million of term cash deposits with Banco do Brasil were included in the
unaudited interim financial statements as at 30 June 2005 as investments. On 6
September 2005, it was announced that USD 294 million of the cash deposits had
been transferred to ABN Amro BV.

Kroll has reported to the Board that, following its initial investigations, it
appears likely that the Company has been subject to a serious fraud affecting
the relevant assets. Kroll has not been able to establish the existence of, nor
verify the Company's entitlement to, any of the relevant assets at any time in
the Company's history.

The Board has informed the police and other relevant authorities of the
circumstances and intends to co-operate to the fullest extent practicable in the
pursuit of those responsible for the events which appear to have occurred.
The Board has instructed the Company's lawyers to explore every avenue available
for the recovery of its assets and to pursue vigorously any parties who may have
been involved in unlawful or improper activity in relation to the Company or its
assets. The Directors believe that the Company has sufficient cash reserves to
commence this action. The Board is not, however, able at this stage to give any
meaningful indication of the prospects for success or the likely timing of these
endeavours.

Due to the continuing uncertainties and investigations the Board consider that
for the time being the Company's shares should remain suspended from trading on
AIM.

Subject to any applicable legal restrictions, the Board will, as appropriate,
make further announcements as to the progress of the investigations and the
actions being taken to recover the Company's assets.

25 November 2005

Haystack - 25 Nov 2005 12:19 - 306 of 373

A few people posting on ADVFN have indicated that they have lost 6 figure sums on this. One has lost 250k.

This is another example of a highly ramped stock where any negative views were shouted down. This always looked too good. In theory punters were buying huge assets in a cash shell for hardly anything.

Even Institutions were taken in. It is always a mistake to think that an investment is safe just because there are institutional holdings.

Obe2konobi - 25 Nov 2005 13:10 - 307 of 373

I`d personally like to see Pearson in prison if this doesn`t get sorted out favourably as he is supposed to have done "due dilegence" before taking on his role. What a plonker....like me for believing it ! Obe

Scripophilist - 25 Nov 2005 13:15 - 308 of 373

I tried to warn people again but again people didn't listen. I don't post for fun about these things!

Scripophilist - 25 Nov 2005 13:26 - 309 of 373

Sorry for anybody that has been done over on this one, it's disgusting.

Dil - 25 Nov 2005 17:38 - 310 of 373

Its the fcuking board of this bloody company that need investigating and no one else.

They put out the news that they had the dosh etc which people then acted on , surely they can be sued by the shareholders ???

Those that got stung , take it , learn from it then move on ..... it happens to us all but in this case there are people who should be held accountable.

Do we have an extradition treaty with Monaco ?

Dil - 25 Nov 2005 17:39 - 311 of 373

And ramping tw*ts like R33Skyline etc don't help things either.

Dil - 25 Nov 2005 17:44 - 312 of 373

andyeds ... re post 267 : don't call me sunshine you bullsh*tting tw*t !

Dil - 25 Nov 2005 18:13 - 313 of 373

and for iPubic .... I have not and have never have had any holding in these and warned others to be careful.

Comprendo ???
Register now or login to post to this thread.