goldfinger
- 09 Jun 2005 12:25
Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).
Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.
cheers GF.
Haystack
- 17 Sep 2013 11:55
- 29436 of 81564
Update: Labour lead at 3
by YouGov in Politics
Tue September 17, 6 a.m. BST
Latest YouGov / The Sun results 16th September - Con 34%, Lab 37%, LD 10%, UKIP 12%;
cynic
- 17 Sep 2013 11:58
- 29437 of 81564
hays - i'm afraid you're as meaninglessly partisan as findus+chips ...... as for fred, he is certainly left-tilted (even if he won't put action with words - i.e. vote) and intentionally contentious, but once he's taken his medication, he can actually be quite sensible on occasion
by the way, you don't begin to answer the question either!
cynic
- 17 Sep 2013 12:28
- 29438 of 81564
A report highlighting deteriorating consumer saving power claims £10,000 invested five years ago in the average savings account would only be worth £8,844 today.
well what a surprise!
was this a free bit of research or did some moron pay for something that was blindingly obvious to all except, seemingly, the moron who commissioned it
Fred1new
- 17 Sep 2013 12:36
- 29439 of 81564
Cynic,
"while i don't think this lot has done anything "useful" with NHS (or education), nor most assuredly did their predecessors,"
All governments make "mistakes", some deliberate and some not so.
As far as the NHS and Education is concerned the things that I think the country can thank the Labour government for, was the building of some decent new hospitals and school buildings and the refurbishment of many. They were in appalling states during and after the "Thatcher years". The PFI system introduced by "maggie" and was used which I think a stupid form of financing, but there was short term "spivs" in that period of government, similar to the present lot .
=====
If you reflect on infrastructure "development" or "repair" , a large amount of it built in the "Victorian" period and "neglected" sold off by the tory period to the "private sector" one can understand some of our problems now.
Perhaps, it is due to your form of "democracy" and having to face before or, at 5 year elections intervals and not prepared to "plan for the long term problems, or development".
Would a partial change of political "management" by MPs be better.
Successful management of large companies tend to evolve over a time periods rather than by revolution. (Members come and go with occasional departure of CEOs etc.)
cynic
- 17 Sep 2013 13:01
- 29440 of 81564
ah well fred, i suppose i shouldn't have expected other than "abuse" from you ...... still no suggestion as to what you would now enact as a matter of urgency, but like i said in various formats above .....
mind you, if you weren't so tight-fisted (your own admission), perhaps there would be some more money to go round the economy :-)
Fred1new
- 17 Sep 2013 14:05
- 29441 of 81564
Abuse??????
I was smiling when I wrote the above!
goldfinger
- 17 Sep 2013 14:18
- 29442 of 81564
electionista@electionista7h
UK - YouGov poll on #EU referendum: 39% would vote to remain in the EU, 42% to leave. If terms renegotiated: 50% to stay, 29% to leave............ends
In code this means,..... Tories will become puppets of UKIP before the Europeans and if not massive defections.
As VINCE says coalition will soon be a goner.
Concluding Labour lead will move to double digit figures.
cynic
- 17 Sep 2013 14:18
- 29443 of 81564
that's cos abusing me gives you so much pleasure, especially as a change from abusing yourself :-)
Haystack
- 17 Sep 2013 14:27
- 29444 of 81564
No Vince Cable didn't say that. He replied to a journalist who asked if the coalition might split His just replied that it was possible. Of course, it has been possible all along, but not likely. The coalition will survive until the election.
I hope you noticed the YouGov poll showing the Labour closing to 3. It will soon be level as the economy improves. Inflation was also down today.
Haystack
- 17 Sep 2013 14:31
- 29445 of 81564
The problem with UKIP is that they can offer nothing. It is extremely unlikely that UKIP will get a single MP. The Conservatives are the only party that can offer a referendum on EU membership.
goldfinger
- 17 Sep 2013 14:33
- 29446 of 81564
Some tories missed this yesterday...........
electionista@electionista16 Sep
UK - Populus poll: CON 33%, LAB 40%, LDEM 11%, UKIP 9% https://twitter.com/PopulusPolls/status/379552449889312768 …ends
BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY as Lynton Crosby as acknowledged..........
electionista@electionista
UK: @lordashcroft poll in 40 CON seats w/ smallest maj: CON 29%(30% national) LAB 43%(35%) LDEM 8%(12%) UKIP 11%(13%) ....ends Lib Dems and UKIP migrating to labour. Only just begun aswel.
Im smiling, Im grinning like a Cheshire Cat.
Haystack
- 17 Sep 2013 14:41
- 29447 of 81564
UKIP's support is spread evenly across the UK. The Libs support has always been concentrated in a small number of constituencies. The result will be UKIP gaining no MPs and the Libs retaining most of their seats with a few marginal losses. I have seen the same situation in many UK elections. The Libs do well with a low percentage, but do little better when their percentage increases. UKIP is well below a breakthrough percentage because they have no grassroots heartland as do the other three parties.
MaxK
- 17 Sep 2013 15:11
- 29449 of 81564
The fun would start when/if the tories ditch Cameroon and embrace ukip, or ukip policies.
Nu lab/dims is a vote for more of the same.
goldfinger
- 17 Sep 2013 15:19
- 29450 of 81564
Ditch Camoron and Osbourne and they wouldnt need UKIP imo Max.
goldfinger
- 17 Sep 2013 15:20
- 29451 of 81564
Think Cable has got it right with his proposal to shift tax from income to assets.
cynic
- 17 Sep 2013 15:33
- 29452 of 81564
so is the proposal to hammer shares over and above CGT and perhaps while you still own them?
where would pension funds then be expected to invest?
what about buy-to-let property, which fulfils a social need and on which CGT would in any case also be applicable once sold?
sounds to me like a recipe for taxing the prudent
MaxK
- 17 Sep 2013 15:39
- 29453 of 81564
Will any tax on assets include trust funds?
lol
goldfinger
- 17 Sep 2013 15:40
- 29454 of 81564
Max Leaked Memo went out last night from the Lib/Dems saying that anyone with over £50 grand income annualy was rich and was a tax target.
Cant remember if it was Newsnight or Sky News 'what the papers say'.
skinny
- 17 Sep 2013 15:43
- 29455 of 81564