mactavish
- 10 Sep 2004 22:20
Company Profile
YooMedia plc is one of the fastest growing interactive entertainment companies in the UK.
Since 1997 we have been developing and launching leading B2C consumer brands in the gaming and community sectors. We also work in a B2B capacity with leading brand owners, agencies, content developers and broadcasters to design and develop their interactive content strategies.
Led by Executive Chairman Dr. Michael Sinclair and Group Managing Director Neil MacDonald, YooMedia has assembled a highly experienced management team that possesses a unique blend of skills and experience in the areas of Digital TV, Internet and mobile phone services and technology.
With main office locations in London, Exeter and Maidstone, YooMedia manages core assets including:
Over 30 office locations throughout the UK alone
State-of-the-art studio, production and post-production facilities at our Wapping location.
UK broadcast return path & bandwidth owner
Fully fledged UK Bookmaker License
Database with over 350K UK singles
SMS Engine access with international reach
Fully staffed 50 seat Customer Contact Centre in Maidstone, Kent
YooMedia Dating & Chat - Our dating subsidiary company manages the oldest and largest UK-owned dating brands including Dateline, Club Sirius and Avenues. YooMedia Dating has over 20 office locations throughout the UK and also manages YooChat, our world-leading interactive chat service found on UK digital cable on the Telewest platform (platform extensions planned for 2005).
YooMedia Gambling & Games - Combining the brands of Avago and Channel 425 (in partnership with William Hill) YooMedia is on the leading-edge of interactive fixed odds, casino and poker gambling services for digital TV, the web and 3G mobile phones. Our gaming business also manages YooPlay, the only interactive just for fun games channel found on all four Digital TV platforms in the United Kingdom.
YooMedia Enhanced Solutions (YES) - YES works with brand owners, agencies, content owners and broadcasters to clarify the options, define the strategies and deliver the interactive content that enhances consumer and audience experiences. YES customers include the BBC, Nestle, Celador, William Hill, Channel 4, ZipTV, The Cartoon Network and HR Owen.
mactavish
- 17 Nov 2005 14:27
- 2961 of 3776
"Other operational programmes are progressing smoothly with new electronic point of sale and text systems installed in over 85% of the William Hill estate."
Text systems. This wouldnt be SMS time stamping would it?
If it is it could be massive! Text your bets into the shop, this would require "stamping" technology for sure.
Dil
- 17 Nov 2005 14:29
- 2962 of 3776
They forgot to add that they had screwed YOO on price as they are a minnow and skint.
Scripophilist
- 17 Nov 2005 16:34
- 2963 of 3776
Nah, I think YOO went into the biggest bookmakers in the UK and slammed down their contract and Wills gave up without a fight and caved into all their demands and fees. I guess it may have happened the other way round but that depends on whether you are a ramper or de-ramper, shorter, anti christ sort of type.
Scripophilist
- 17 Nov 2005 16:35
- 2964 of 3776
Speak to Will Hill and they will tell you FOBT are the future.
Fundamentalist
- 17 Nov 2005 16:46
- 2965 of 3776
Mactavish
rarely post on this thread but a question - how many people do you actually think will text in a bet? Why text when you could pop in, phone, bet on the internet (either via pc or pda). This is obviously a target aimed at the technologically competent - they all use the internet already and the clever ones use betfair rather than a high street bookie where they get a better price
Scrip - FOBTs - a mug punters paradise!!!
mactavish
- 17 Nov 2005 17:06
- 2966 of 3776
consumers continue to use text messaging in increasing numbers and has lots of untapped potential.
Fundamentalist
- 17 Nov 2005 17:30
- 2967 of 3776
That doesnt answer the question - can you give me one reason why someone would bet by text not the other mediums - ie what benefits does it offer.
The process of placing a bet using any of the other mediums is a 2 way process - you ask what the current price is and then you choose whether to be at that price and how much - by text how do you know what price you will be betting at or would it be restricted to SP only (and hence making it even less attractive!)
mactavish
- 17 Nov 2005 21:42
- 2968 of 3776
Hands up got it wrong.
the "text" systems refer to the display screen systems which have betting shows etc on them and these are supplied by Alphameric.The text system is called Albos and the Point of sale systems,also supplied by Alphameric are called Betsoft.
Dil
- 17 Nov 2005 22:49
- 2969 of 3776
Lol, you gone short mac ?
Dil
- 19 Nov 2005 01:45
- 2970 of 3776
2p by xmas ....
tomcress2000
- 19 Nov 2005 11:43
- 2971 of 3776
20p by xmas ....
iPublic
- 19 Nov 2005 14:45
- 2972 of 3776
38p
someuwin
- 19 Nov 2005 16:22
- 2973 of 3776
27.5p
Scripophilist
- 19 Nov 2005 16:47
- 2974 of 3776
If the share was priced on hopeless optimism then at least 1
If it was priced on reality you couldn't give it away!
TStringy
- 20 Nov 2005 17:01
- 2975 of 3776
LOL!
The AIM's full of such companies. Unfortunately though their shares are never actually free..........wonder why that is?
15p - 20p
mactavish
- 20 Nov 2005 20:56
- 2976 of 3776
thanks to malkie.
Im going to do a bit of speculating here just on the basis of the information at hand.
After a little chat with Axe last week he drew my attention to the wording of announcements and how you have to dissect them very carefully. If you do you can see there is often more revealed (or concealed!) than at first meets the eye.
So hear goes....
From the recent Trading Statement:
During the last three months the Board has conducted an in-depth review of the Company's activities. This has resulted in a decision to explore strategic alternatives for its Dating division following preliminary approaches from third parties. The significant value of the Dating business is, in the Director's opinion, obscured in the Company as a whole. Such alternatives are expected to provide both increased marketing opportunities for the division and strengthen the Company's balance sheet.
The more you read the above extract the more interesting it becomes:
Dissecting it; in-depth review of Companys activities commenced 3 months ago in August. At some point between then & the release of the trading statement a decision was made to explore strategic alternatives for the dating division. This decision was made with the backdrop of preliminary approaches received from third parties.
Then the really interesting bit:
"Such alternatives are expected to provide both increased marketing opportunities & strengthen the Companys balance sheet.
I think this could be more of a done deal than it first looks.
If the trading statement is to be believed, the company cannot be talking about a straightforward disposal. If it were, then whilst any proceeds would certainly strengthen the balance sheet, a disposal in itself would not result in increased marketing opportunities for the Company.
In order to provide the company with increased marketing opportunities, the proposition would need to offer the Company access to markets beyond their existing database. That says to me that a third party would also be bringing something to the party (In addition to cash) perhaps in terms of either access to a larger market, or perhaps their own database of singles.
According to the trading statement, the strategic review commenced in the middle of August, over a month before the interims were published, which announced the appointment of Josie Adams as Chief Executive of Yoomedia dating and that Jim Weir was to be positioned as Chairman of the Dating division. This signalled that the division was to be restructured, but no reason or justification was given at the time. Given the announcement of "exploring stratigic alternatives for the Division" in the trading statement, this move starts to make a bit more sense.
The "stratigic alternative" sounds to me like a JV of some description or a merger of the division with a third party. Perhaps with an equity buy in from the third party mentioned.
"The significant value of the Dating business is, in the Director's opinion, obscured in the Company as a whole"
I also think the object may not be to realise as much cash as possible by way of a disposal. Rather to achieve the benefits of a more realistic valuation attached to the division going forward and to be able to raise as much cash as is required through some type of JV or strategic alliance, thus wiping out the overdraft & seeing them through to C/F+.
It probably wouldnt pay to speculate further as to what type of entity this 3rd party may be, as there are countless possible fits.
But when ITV are looking at FriendsReunited with a 150m price tag on the business, http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/11/07/itv_friends/
You can appreciate the Boards logic in the statement The significant value of the Dating business is, in the Director's opinion, obscured in the Company as a whole.
As I said, I think this could be more of a done deal than it looks.
But lets not get too exuberant and ignore altogether the main thrust of the trading statement and that was to advise that as a result of delays in renegotiating the WH contract, C/F+ is expected to be delayed till 1st of next F/Y and of course that the balance sheet does need strengthening.
One thing that was overlooked last week was Ciscos $6.9 bid for Scientific Atlanta, the US second largest producer of set top boxes, signalling Ciscos desire to move into the home networking market (VOD, IPTV & Cable). More evidence that the Cable war is really hotting up!
http://www.iht.com/articles/2005/11/18/business/cisco.php
http://portal.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?xml=/money/2005/11/19/cncisc19.xml&menuId=242&sSheet=/money/2005/11/19/ixcity.html
http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/4492.html
Scripophilist
- 20 Nov 2005 21:26
- 2977 of 3776
It looks like YOO holders are into astrology now after than last post. I've never seen so much positive spin and mis-interpretation put into one RNS, It's a classic. Definately one for the lectures. Companies WILL ALWAYS post the most positive news available, therefore any hint of negative interpretation should be taken very seriously not turned into some mystic interpretation.
As for anybody that believes that interpretation, The moon is in conjunction with Uranus.
mactavish
- 21 Nov 2005 11:09
- 2978 of 3776
Thanks to AXE79.
Further clarity.
Thought I better explain further, for all the holders rather than the traders,
things are shaping up nicely.
The big news last week was the RNS on the 15th.
Are you aware that if the production costs of channel 425 were not being borne
by YOO throughout Q2 the financial picture would have been very different?
The company would have been cash flow positive!
The costs are now being met by William Hill AS FROM the signing of the contract
on Friday the 11th Nov. This is a major improvement in the deal that Yoo has with
them previously. The enormity of this deal is not yet factored into the Share price.
Onto another matter, when the tie in with 'Who wants to be a Millionaire' started
no one knew how successfull it would be. It was thought that they might get say
25,000 responses per show.
They got 250,000 on one show when the people at home joined in on 3 occasions!
On last weeks show on just I response they got 100,000 hits. The figures are
improving.
Since the RNS Yoo has received even more approaches, so there's a few now
on the table to consider with various different proposal been made. There is
action happening on other fronts, so I sense that they are not in a hurry.
This implies to me that the working cash position is OK.
capetown
- 21 Nov 2005 11:14
- 2979 of 3776
Thx for your last post mac!!
mactavish
- 21 Nov 2005 14:33
- 2980 of 3776
post worth reading just put on the iii board by 'Smash n Grab'.....
"I would say a turnover of 100million+ is strong (10 million per month).
There have been delays which have slowed profit, namely with William Hill. However, the contract has now been improved and will contribute to profit in 2006. YOO no longer bear the production costs (see Axe post earlier), which would have been considerable.
This revenue projection does not include the new products released in August which would have incurred considerable cost, nor does it include the potential of the NTL (again significant cost), freeview or 3G services which are in their infancy.
It doesnt include new contracts from YES, ipublic etc (could grow to be the leading division). Nor new agreements with Gemstar and ICTV, all of which will contribute to profit in 2006.
It doesnt include "startegic alternatives" for the dating division which WILL strengthen the balance sheets.
It doesnt include "Real time SMS" which will be licenced more and more as iTV grows etc etc.
The cost of YOOs technology has been significant but the roll out should see much greater revenue and profits.
Profit Q1 2006, thereafter YOO will fulfill its true potential."