Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.
  • Page:
  • 1

It's not on! (CEN)     

bharathi_raj - 05 Feb 2008 11:47

Like a lot of long time investors in this company - yet another dissapointment - after years of hanging in there on promises of 'JAM Tomorrow' i trusted the board to not let some predatory shark swim in and take over just when the products are looking promising - don't betray us board!

bharathi_raj - 05 Feb 2008 13:00 - 3 of 7

I thionk wioth the potemtial of the morphine derivatives they have on board - they are sitting on a goldmine - Phase 3 and all is well.

queen1 - 05 Feb 2008 13:11 - 4 of 7

I agree with both views but the SP has tanked over the last couple of years so it's good to at least see the interest.

hangon - 06 Feb 2008 15:45 - 5 of 7

The grqadual fall is folks like thee and me wanting to invest in something "exciting" - i.e. short-term gains with the swings in the Market. That means some sells are nothing to do with the "long-term" - but MM don't want to lose out...hence the "tanking"
The reason for the CONsolidation was to make good of a bad situation - the correct price is in excess of 2 ( look at the earlier sp graph ).....therefore any bid that's below 2-3 is under-valuing the business as it was about a year ago - i.e. with no income or products (ignore any) .. so anyone buying "now" is getting a Bargain, compared with the 5p that is was over a year ago.

This is the problem with consolidation - it's all too-easy to start from the sp "now" and think a 20% uplift is a bargain . . . . wait until we touch 2. - and then see if there are any takers.

We must wait for the Drug-Trials to be concluded - anything less and the "value" is being 'stolen', IMHO.

hangon - 30 Mar 2008 21:52 - 6 of 7

Oh dear touching 40-p Arrgh.
The Market is just not interested and MM's mark down hoping for a few sellers ( er, and Buyers at these bargain prices), however, I'm waiting a bit longer as I guess I paid "too much" so many years ago...Oh dear.

Bah to CONsolidations . . . .why did they do it?

hangon - 18 Apr 2008 14:27 - 7 of 7

Takeover!
(the Consolidation was the final warning, but I for one thought this was a funny five minutes with Management. However, it was really a warning that Management was grossly incompetant - er, IMHO.)
It's a pity Management has so-badly handled their years of Office - that they see the only solution to their years is to sell out at a knock-down price!

Well, it's true there is no substantive "value" in the company - that is something worth selling . . . .so in many ways the money spent to date is "poured away" - it makes one think that a Better Model is to secure lots of cash - then WAIT - yes, wait until one Bio hits bad times - it is "bound" to happen over 10-years - so we should support only "really good" drugs to be taken forward . . . . no wonder Punters are seen as saps - Management is very grateful for 10-years salary and pensions, whilst the investors get close to zippo.

At least we have some Paion stock to show for it. Should M6G fail that will look a smart move.
I wonder what BTG though of their child?
  • Page:
  • 1
Register now or login to post to this thread.