hangon
- 29 Sep 2008 17:26
It's an amazing feat to have renegotiated their Banking facilities in the teeth of a World-Bank melt-down . . .
But having said that (positive), this business shows all the hallmarks of one whose customers have deserted them =- about the same as Woolworths.
Just what does JSP offer customers that they can't get (cheaper On-Line) elsewhere - nothing that's my take...too many shops are just too large to support the level of business - in effect the print-business - but that's nothing compared with selling traditional cameras.
But doesn't everyone have a camera - or a phone-camera . . . quality doesn't matter for the majority - just the convenience of sending a snap on-line using yr phone - that'll do.....the "amateur interest" in cameras has evaporated IMHO - folk can sit at home and manipulate their photos on computer.
Today's 45% rise is MM opportunity . . . . but really does not address the business model issues.
All IMHO, my holding is barely worth a stamp.
hangon
- 19 Dec 2008 17:14
- 3 of 28
They claimed to have renegotiated their borrowings, but I suspect a sp under 1p tell a story that Execs have been hiding - that this is about as dead as dead can be, whilst not yet signed-off.
A real shame, like Woolworths which I believe could have been saved given a little Marketing pzaz - furthermore, I suspect JSP could be turned round, but that was when their sp was in double-figures....now it has to be "all-over"
-hlyeo98 - what's yr take?
What it demonstrates is that there is a lot of Lack-lustre Management about.
( and I'm not too sure about SR, of MKS oops!).
23Feb09 - up 19% on Zero buys - MM's Huh. . . . . sp 2.03 Grief!
24March09 - up 80% on a AGM-statement that things were not as bad as last year - so that's a profit is it? Er, not yet it seems....but many have Traded on this statement...
hangon
- 28 May 2009 00:17
- 4 of 28
60% down on news there may be little left for retail investors . . . . oh deary!
/
Dil
- 28 May 2009 00:43
- 5 of 28
Anyone want to swop these for my MDX shares ?
magicdust
- 29 May 2009 08:26
- 6 of 28
I've heard some inside news about possible takeover here, just watch this end of play today and early next week, if it's confirmed this is going to go through the roof...
cynic
- 29 May 2009 08:27
- 7 of 28
magicdust? ...... more like magicmushrooms!
magicdust
- 29 May 2009 08:30
- 8 of 28
The proof is in the pudding, just be patient and watch closely. You'll see...
magicdust
- 29 May 2009 08:39
- 9 of 28
I think you're also forgetting that Barclays (10%) is a major shareholder in Jessops. That speaks enough volumes, firstly BARC only invest to make a profit (they've got JSP cheap), and secondly investment = cash flow.
This is a great price to make a short term profit, check back next week and I'll put my money on this hovering around 4-5p
cynic
- 29 May 2009 08:41
- 10 of 28
no one but no one is going to buy this heap of junk ..... JSP don't own any of their properties and the high streets are choc-a-bloc with vacant shops .... further, JSP don't even have the right product at the right price
magicdust
- 29 May 2009 08:44
- 11 of 28
So why have Barclays bought 10% of the holdings then?
cynic
- 29 May 2009 08:46
- 12 of 28
you could well ask why barclays invested in plenty of other duds too!
magicdust
- 29 May 2009 09:33
- 13 of 28
371,000 just bought what did I tell you? Just watch this over the next 3-4 working days.
cynic
- 29 May 2009 10:18
- 14 of 28
yeah yeah yeah ...... 371k @2p = truly massive stake of 7500
XSTEFFX
- 29 May 2009 18:02
- 15 of 28
2p
hangon
- 29 May 2009 19:06
- 16 of 28
I'm thinking Cynic has this right.
IMHO, our Banks are no-longer held in any esteem so whatever they are doing is unlikely to turn JSP's fortunes - the fact is that JSP has to "match" internet Prices and their shops are a millstone arround their finances - the cost of this operation is far greater that internet-priced sales can handle.
Cameras are now a commodity - Model, Price = that's it.
+I wonder if this is BARC itself, or an investment via a sharedealing/nominee . . . ?
cynic
- 29 May 2009 19:22
- 17 of 28
gosh! .... almost a compliment
partridge
- 01 Jun 2009 11:52
- 18 of 28
I imagine that non certificated shareholdings held through Barclays Stockbrokers Nominees would mean that Barclays might well have a declarable interest without directly holding any shares for its own benefit (or otherwise in the case of JSP)?
partridge
- 01 Jun 2009 13:48
- 19 of 28
Sorry hangon - just read the last sentence of your post 16. Senility I'm afraid.
hangon
- 29 Sep 2009 18:17
- 20 of 28
Today Jessop Shareholders are effectively "wiped-Out" ( see RNS)
Seems the rump-Management will shunt the parent co. off the Market in exchange for 100k, meaning that if you hold 100 shares you will be lucky to get 9p.
( Not sure what will happen next, but I'm guessing Managment has lined up a feathered nest for their exclusive use.)
You'd think this "brand" was worth something, but clearly the cost of "retail" is far more than "on-line" where digital cameras are available heavily discounted.
A disgraceful end for a promising floatation - remember this was well over 1 - Oo-er, - and Grr also.
DYOR . . . . all IMHO.
...Any other views...?
dealerdear
- 29 Sep 2009 19:46
- 21 of 28
They have been saying for some time now shareholders won't be getting anything. It said in the press a few days ago that the company is now jointly owned by 3 parties, one of which is the banks.
Thankfully I don't own but commiserations to those that do.
cynic
- 29 Sep 2009 20:46
- 22 of 28
sorry, but bloody fools if they do ..... jessops has been a disaster for more than a year and has been well flagged as such