jgp212
- 08 Jul 2003 22:07
Thoughts please!!
:-)
Jeff
Haystack
- 08 Jul 2003 23:52
- 3 of 8
Yes. It is very similar. I think it may be a bir faster. It logs on faster and seems to take less resources.
Martini
- 09 Jul 2003 00:23
- 4 of 8
Yep no problems nothing radical but I like the companion feature - always on top small opaque window showing emails and IM status. Also the pop up blocker seems to work and auto redial if you get dumped.
Other than that feels very similar.
agent007
- 09 Jul 2003 08:12
- 5 of 8
I'm finding it a bit of a heap, but this is just on first impressions so might come to like it later. Previously used AOL6 which was no trouble to install or use (never bothered to upgrade to 7); however have just yesterday installed AOL8 for a trial. This time - loads of trouble, had to use the tech support helpline twice to fix two separate problems with the install; and it still comes up with some "tkonnect" error message every time I start it. At least I can access the Internet with no dial-up cut-offs now though, which is my reason for using AOL.
jgp212
- 10 Jul 2003 04:08
- 6 of 8
Thanks for the input guys.
Much appreciated.
:-)
Jeff
midknight
- 10 Jul 2003 11:36
- 7 of 8
agent007- Anything above AOL5 will really work only with faster computers
is what the AOL Techteam told me.
moneyman
- 25 Jul 2003 23:30
- 8 of 8
Shame the shares aint as good ! Lost a fing packet !!!