goldfinger
- 07 Nov 2003 16:24
- 30 of 55
I think we need to keep the thread tittles up to date thus reflecting the stocks present status in the market. I had no problems contacting admin like you suggested Little Woman in fact they seem to be a nice group of people.
Anyway going to my favourite epic - PUB.
Wish everybody a good weekend, COME ON ENGLAND, sorry if you are Welsh.
cheers GF.
ajren
- 20 Nov 2003 10:37
- 33 of 55
Hi lw.
Too many with very little history.History is History.
The Stock Market exists in 1 second of time so - just an opinion - readers
want the very LATEST info e.g.I have just posted The mutualnet info of Nov 19
i.e.Schewo = 284,213,728 shares = 7.258 per cent of company.ALREADY that is
out of date i.e.history as the price now reflects that info.
Also,the traders tread constantly needs updating as the latest treads do not-
often - show the LATEST info so in effect they are History.
I would like readers of this post to add to it and say what they want.
rgds aj
ajren
- 20 Nov 2003 11:02
- 35 of 55
First sentence :- I seem to be doing a lot of posting but with info that is
the very latest.
The traders tread usually does not have the Latest info so much of it is
Historical
I completely agree with your last sentence.
I hope we have a lot of Postings here on this tread so readers will then know
what people want e.g.History/The Latest rgds aj
Fundamentalist
- 20 Nov 2003 11:16
- 36 of 55
Personally I am with Little Woman on this. I would prefer fewer threads with the history on them and a specific thread daily for short term info. As a longer term investor it is interesting to go back and evaluate historical news and people's reactions to it and then compare it to the effect on the share price. This helps to understand how a company's share price reacts to certain news as a guide to future performance. It is also helpful to compare shares, for example when people post is company "a" the next company "b", it is then helpful to go and read the history on company "b". I also think that each thread should be kept as specific to one share as possible, rather than several different shares being discussed on one thread, as happens, can lead to some confusion
ajren
- 20 Nov 2003 11:43
- 37 of 55
Thanks for post.I hope we get many more posts.aj
Fundamentalist
- 20 Nov 2003 11:49
- 38 of 55
Likewise, I am just starting to get into this a bit more (trying to find time away from work the main constraint) but personally I find a lot of the info on these bulletin boards exceptionally helpful, the only frustration sometimes being having to sift through a lot to find bits that are of personal interest. I am starting to feel more confident expressing my views and will start to post a bit more on the threads where I have an understanding.
B_ASKIN
- 20 Nov 2003 11:57
- 39 of 55
Can jules99 (an experienced poster) please explain why she didn't add her RTD comment to the existing thread started by Nitefly?
ajren
- 20 Nov 2003 12:07
- 40 of 55
Fundamentalist.Please do not wait until you get more confidence/or where I
have an understanding.The purpose - just an opinion - is for anyone to offer
anything:whether they are looking for information/help or offering information
rgds aj
Andy
- 21 Nov 2003 09:41
- 42 of 55
LW,
re your last point, I agree, some questions are asked endless times, and whilst I'm sure everyone enjoys helping people that are new to either the BB, or a particular thread, it does become tiresome when the same simple question is asked many times.
Beware, some of the "new people" are in fact well known posters from another BB, and some have more than one logon id!
optomistic
- 21 Nov 2003 13:34
- 43 of 55
LW re your posting 30 Nov (no.31)your comments explain the lack of your posts on this BB. I thought that you had gone away on holiday! I and many others will certainly miss your posts on what I can only describe as wide ranging interesting and informative. I do hope that you will reconsider your posting policy and return to the investors BB.
Regards
Opomistic
ajren
- 21 Nov 2003 13:38
- 44 of 55
I agree.I sometimes disagree with her point of view but this is very good
as we can all learn something by looking at the same info in a different way.aj
optomistic
- 21 Nov 2003 13:46
- 45 of 55
thanks ajren,
lets hope that many others will join in with their support to encourage LW 'to return'
ricardopage
- 21 Nov 2003 14:07
- 46 of 55
I'm always suspicious if there are multiple threads they usually have titles like 'next stop 10p', '100 bagger', 'next stop 30p' etc etc. My guess is the creators of such threads are usually trying to offload unwanted stock.
while we're on the subject of threads, it would be nice if they had a favourites function.
ajren
- 21 Nov 2003 14:15
- 47 of 55
Ref : Multiple Treads.I agree with L.W./etc.The situation with Gold is
particularly annoying.I started a GOLD tread to get all treads relating to
Gold on one site.However,this has not happened.Why?
ajren
- 21 Nov 2003 14:19
- 49 of 55
Why ?