THIS SHARE WILL BE WORTH 3.00 IN 2009

So its a yes vote, but anyone else spot the deliberate mistake.
Cant they get anything right lately. Surely someone proof reads these releases.

Its in the same format as the BTG vote, although after a struggle I could make those out. The Protherics vote is almost impossible to decipher.
Why cant it just state plainly.
Votes for. Votes against. Votes withheld.

But from another site showing a different RNS format the results show.

No of scheme shareholders voted 785 (99.4%)
Total votes 244,371, 671

No of scheme shareholders voted 'for' 717 (91.3%)
Total of votes 'for' 243,009,601
No of scheme shareholders voted 'against' shows 68 (8.7%)
Total votes 'against 243,009,601 (0.6%)

As the votes for and against in number (but not percentage) are the same obviously this is an error. I have taken the votes for from the total votes cast to give those against at 1,362,070 which would match the (0.6%)

Ain't I the clever one then.

Financial Highlights, show everything up that should be up and everything down that should be down, except.....Net cash decrease of 9.6m (2007: increase of 6.9m) in line with expectations, providing a cash position of 28.1m (2007: 46.9m) This in the stage of Protherics as a company was/is expected.
Who needs BTG. OK it will give PTI more pulling power so to speak, but would still have liked them (PTI) to have chanced going it alone. Yes a big gamble but worth it.
In my opinion. BTG have by far the best part of the deal. PTI have sold themselves out far too cheaply.
All IMHO of course.

I hold both, although BTG is the Greater position.
However, I thought it was BTG that was getting the worse deal!
PTI has a small income (Crofab) and much to proove with expensive trials - I;m guessing it's touch n' go whether they need more cash - in these Markets forget it. So what could PTI do? If nothing is done now ( when things still look OK ), gradually the sp will slip - and indeed we saw this earlier 2008 - (abt. 25p I recall.)
. . . . . . . How much worse would this get if they did nothing? . . . . .
So, with BTG comming up with Varisolve which is very valuable and probably 10x Crofab, indeed 30x wouldn't surprise me - BTG-holders are expected to welcome PTI shareholders by way of Dilution - well, it seems to me PTI did the better Deal . . . . . but in truth maybe it's fortunate for us both that no money is being lost in the deal - although I'd like to see a culling of pti-execs - far too many for such a small Co. BTG appears to be quite efficient by comparison. ( I attended both AGM's this year).
. . . . . . . . "New BTG" will be a suberb investment and I have been buying PTI recently as this is a cheap-way in, although less-so now it's up. . . . . . . .
+Greekman - are you a L-T holder . . . ?
EDIT(8Dec08),Greekman, that's OK. Good to know you are staying - I sincerely hope this will be Good for investors, but as always we need to keep a watcvh in case Management starts to take their eye off ball...as so often happens -(- I'm somwhat disapointed by PYM...oh deary.)-

Hi Hangon,

Yes been in and out for many years now, although my last foray into PTI has been held for about 2 years now, with a couple of small increases over that period.
Still feel we (PTI) drew the short straw but at least all we need to worry about now is BTG making it.

Well thats it then, Saying goodbye with not a little regret. Always thought Protherics could have eventually made it big on it's own. Still within a few years we will all know whether this takeover/merger is a good idea or not.
Will hold now in BTG to see how things go.
Any selling out now, just would like to say this as been one of the better threads on MoneyAm, with the vast majority of posts well worth reading.
No doubt we have all learnt something.
Cheers to all.

Greek.

cheers greek!