Camco Clean Energy is an experienced project developer working to develop, construct and operate projects that contribute to building a sustainable future.

With more than 20 years of successful project delivery we help clients in Asia, North America, Africa and Europe to implement clean energy and emission reduction solutions, reducing costs and maximising financial and environmental benefits. We have an outstanding track record in technical delivery and commercial expertise working with local industry, multinational companies, governments and regulatory bodies.

Camco Clean Energy has created one of the largest emission reductions portfolios and has structured ground breaking and innovative arrangements for the sale and delivery of emission reductions to compliance and voluntary buyers. Camco Clean Energy collaborates with industry, project developers, equipment providers and investor groups to create emissions-to-energy projects and maximise sustainable energy production across a range of sectors; including biogas, renewable energy, energy efficiency, and land use.

Camco Clean Energy also provide strategic, policy, commercial and technical expertise accrued over two decades to deliver low carbon energy and sustainable development solutions.

At 1.175p are well below the cash held. Improving carbon prices since last week. Share price on the bounce from recent lows.


Link ..... ISDX trades on CCE

3.90p + 0.325p

on the way up after yesterday's marked down and ahead of next week Interims

at ISDX 50K buy paying full offer 4p just now

4.60p now

well on the up after the early profit taking
that is very close to Intraday BREAKOUT

Issue of 1st California Carbon Offsets

Well done holders here.

not complaing

-------------------
Volatile now as the day trades are taking profits, while others take advantage of the fall to buy or top up

on the up big time

ramper

Perhaps you can give me all the ins and outs of this company halifax

dc go and lie down you are feeling tetchy!

Serious question, don't you know the answers ?

:-)

lol

Mr depression is perhaps getting my answers ?

skin agree hope not many are caught out.

Hold well at the end of the day after rising 50% on the last hour and finishing best performing share of the day

LSE % Top Gainers

CCE Camco Clean +122%
REM Rare Earth Min +41%
ENGI Energiser +31%


LSE % Top Losers

RLH Red Leopard -23%
FCR Ferrum Crescent -21%
PHE Powerhouse Ener -19%

Considering CCE have

US Projects business
US Carbon business
Africa Renewables business
China Carbon business
EU Carbon business
and last but not least REDT which by itself could be a multi-mulit bagger for those of us holding

The Market cap is very low £16M even after today's rise with all the business above and $10 of cash

Nice days work on CCE..for once it was good timing by me having bought in @.385p couple of days ago.. also in REM(from b4 the big rise!) & PLE so it's been a great few weeks.

After the morning profit taking, the share is moving higher again, best price since 9am with a narrow spread now 7.50 / 7.75p, earlier MMs wide the spread to 0.50p

Interim results tomorrow, nothing special but maybe some positive news on the way

Japan is set to start building the world's largest storage battery system as early as this autumn. It will also begin experiments to control fluctuations from renewable energy sources.

Hokkaido Electric will build a “redox flow battery system” produced by Sumitomo at one of its substations in the town of Abira, 500 miles from Tokyo. The system will be a 60 MWh vanadium redox flow battery. It will be as high as a six-storey building.

A redox flow battery repeats charging and discharging operations in a tank using an electrolytic solution of vanadium. The system will have a lifespan ranging from 10 to 20 years.

The Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry has allocated US$202 million to cover the full cost of developing and manufacturing the system.

It believes the introduction of redox flow batteries will enable utilities to buy 10% more electricity from renewable energy sources.

Posted on the Green in the City Site:

'September?s Green in the City on the subject of ?
Energy Storage: the Achilles Heel of Renewable Energy??
started with two premises that I doubt anyone in a very packed room would argue with:

A successful energy strategy must rely on efficient energy storage
Failure by Government to support energy storage will potentially damage the commercial case for renewables.
The evening itself began with a classical allusion from Anthony Price that I think summed up a key theme of the evening: imagine little Achilles being dipped in the River Styx and, rather than Paris waiting to hurt him where he was most vulnerable, it is the powers that be in Westminster lurking in the shadows ready to deliver the fatal blow.

It was an interesting mix of praise for the Government?s (and for that lets also read DECC?s) support of storage innovation and deep frustration with the lack of the on-going support to ensure these vital technologies cross the ?valley of death? into commercialisation. I for one think DECC would have got a far less easy ride if so many people in the room hadn?t invested so much effort in the recent Energy Storage competition and weren?t anxiously awaiting what seems a rather drawn-out decision about Round 2.

ecoConnect has debated energy storage before ? what was fascinating about this year?s discussion was how far the thinking about the importance of storage, the range of solutions available and the understanding of its importance to the strengthening of the argument in favour of renewable energy has come. At least from the sector itself ? Government I fear still seems to have a long way to go.

So how did our panel (and the audience) view the state of storage and what did they want? Our moderator, Tim Fox of IMECHE, set the tone for the night by describing energy storage as the enabler that would, through its wide range of applications, simplify or reduce the need for major infrastructure developments in the path to decarbonisation (of heat and transport as well as electricity) and help developing countries ?leapfrog? through to clean energy. The rest of the panel supported this ? noting that there are weak points in the case for renewable energy, not least the variable nature of supply, but firmly placing energy storage as the factor that makes the difference. Everyone was very positive about the levels of innovation in the sector, the need for a multi-solution approach and the measurable impact that energy storage can make ? Sir John Samuel cited the 20% increased yield achievable through REDT?s flow battery technology as an excellent example of this.

So all these things are being done well ? energy storage is one of the 8 great technologies and the UK is working at the cutting edge of innovation. Problem, what problem? Time to go back to the shadows and ask what the Government/DECC (I know there?s a distinction, I?ve just decided to ignore it) is doing, other than observing, researching, ignoring the need for incentives, funding competitions that don?t translate into major demonstration plants, talking about 2020 when curtailment starts as though its light-years away and waiting to see what will happen in the market because they are ?trying to deliver a renewable revolution in an economically-constrained climate.? I hadn?t noticed a massive economic upswing in the USA but they?ve managed to invest over $2bn in battery development alone.

What did the panel want? The messages were loud and clear and the list is more than reasonable.

A shop-window for UK technology so that our innovations can be seen and sold.
Government policy that looks beyond one term or a limited life-span such as the 10 year EMR period so that certainty is built into the market for investors.
A market-mechanism that recognises the emerging nature of technologies in this sector and supports them through incentives or other intervention so that large-scale deployment of storage becomes the norm.

A roadmap for storage that takes us to 2020 and beyond and which also looks at the costs of connection to the Grid.
A recognition by Government that the market doesn?t act collectively and that there are times, like this, when a steer is essential.

So what did the panel really want: the Government to come out of the shadows and move energy storage centre-stage and into the light. Not a big ask really.'