Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.
  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

Annoying someone via the Internet in the US is now a federal crime.     

Bullshare - 10 Jan 2006 14:34

A new federal law states that when you annoy someone on the Internet, you must disclose your identity. Here's the relevant language.

"Whoever...utilizes any device or software that can be used to originate telecommunications or other types of communications that are transmitted, in whole or in part, by the Internet... without disclosing his identity and with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass any person...who receives the communications...shall be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than two years, or both."

Last Thursday, President Bush signed into law a prohibition on posting annoying Web messages or sending annoying e-mail messages without disclosing your true identity.


Buried deep in the new law is Sec. 113, an innocuously titled bit called "Preventing Cyberstalking." It rewrites existing telephone harassment law to prohibit anyone from using the Internet "without disclosing his identity and with intent to annoy."

To grease the rails for this idea, Sen. Arlen Specter, a Pennsylvania Republican, and the section's other sponsors slipped it into an unrelated, must-pass bill to fund the Department of Justice. The plan: to make it politically infeasible for politicians to oppose the measure.

The tactic worked. The bill cleared the House of Representatives by voice vote, and the Senate unanimously approved it Dec. 16

thai - 12 Jan 2006 09:33 - 31 of 42

dick cheney hospitalised due to shortness of breath.....

woohoo time to break out the champagne....lying, murdering b@!@rd

DocProc - 12 Jan 2006 10:27 - 32 of 42

E-mails bothering you?

Learn a new, effective and satisfyingly communicative way to respond HERE

Jules - 12 Jan 2006 12:10 - 33 of 42

Doc.. I am sat here p*ssing myself with laughter...I definitely know someone I amgoing to use this with :-)))

MightyMicro - 12 Jan 2006 12:18 - 34 of 42

Doc,

Excellent!

little woman - 12 Jan 2006 14:50 - 35 of 42

yes - excellent - wish I could have to courage to do the same

deadfred - 12 Jan 2006 16:39 - 36 of 42

doc brilliant

Scripophilist - 12 Jan 2006 20:35 - 37 of 42

Doc you really come up with some crackers! Brilliant, Remind me, what do you do for a living?

Oh shit, I just realised my use of puncuation will now need to decrease dramatically.

DocProc - 13 Jan 2006 00:01 - 38 of 42

:)

Meanwhile, check your home out from a few points of view....

http://www.homecheck.co.uk

Dil - 17 Jan 2006 23:00 - 39 of 42

Sorry to disappoint but the results on my post code are a total pile of crap for me and anyone else within 500m , 2 miles or so away then maybe.

How the fcuk have I got a "High" risk of flooding at the top of a bloody hill ???

:-)

chocolat - 17 Jan 2006 23:19 - 40 of 42

You're Welsh aren't you?

DocProc - 17 Jan 2006 23:23 - 41 of 42

Tiny hill, in a big Wesh valley, near a big lake?

axdpc - 18 Jan 2006 09:23 - 42 of 42

Dil, not high enough in a biblical flood ?
  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Register now or login to post to this thread.