Will this increase or decrease the likelihood of terrorist actions in America, Europe and the rest of the world?

If you were a member of a family murdered in this conflict, would you be seeking revenge?

Should Tzipi Livni and Ehud Olmert, be tried for war crimes if or when this conflict comes to an end?

What will the price of oil be in 4 weeks time?

12 crew.

15 volunteers to do what?
merely observe peacefully and without intervention - as would be required if UN observers?

The volunters on all but one of the ships in the last aid convoy were peaseful observers. The other one had people who fought back at the illegal seizure.

"illegal" is inflammatory (as intended) and certainly contentious and even debatable.

"peaceful observers" remain to be proved, but certainly if they are, then it is more than likely that the vessel will be ordered into ashdod for inspection, which the captain will be obliged to obey, even if it goes against his wishes - PTH is much more knowledgeable than i on maritime matters, but i'm 99% sure i am correct

the question then remains as to whether hamas will refuse entree to this "humanitarian aid", even if it has been "depleted" ..... history indicates that they will, which as i said, makes hamas's altruism (you said it!) more than a little suspect

Their aim is to stop the closure of a sea access to Gaza. That's what the ship is trying to do and what more ships that are being prepared are trying to do.

time to get real .... hamas aim is to be as provocative as possible, ideally goading israel into disproportionate reaction as with the first ship ..... of course hamas want open access to gaza, but merely for the import of more armaments .... relief for the innocents in gaza comes a long way down the list of priorities .... the very cynical might even say it would just be an incidental by-product

Of course Hamas is tring to be provocative. They want all crossings and access open and yes it is also for armaments. Why is it that Israel is allowed all the arms they want and the Palestinians can't have any?

I do think that Hamas is interested in the the well being of the residents of Gaza and the West Bank. This is not incompatible with their struggle against Israel. Of course Hamas should have weapons and should use them against Israel. Are you suggesting that the Palestinians just sit idly by while they are oppressed and their land is seized.

so you think a successful outcome will only be from the barrel of a gun?
history tells us time after time that this is almost never the case and that in the end, there is always a political resolution.

israel hs much to answer for and is both morally and politically in the wrong in many aspects

there should certainly be a separate and independent homeland for the palestinians, though israel equally has an inalienable right to exist peacefully - clearly something hamas and hezbollah and their adherents refuse to accept

so, until h+h and their puppeteers change their mindset, this tiresome and wasteful conflict will continue - a gross over-simplification i fully accept

===============

you admit that hamas only want "open seas" so they can import armaments

can you therefore really expect that israel should sit back and allow that, especially given h's clear and stated aim is to destroy israel?

meanwhile, h's puppeteers rub their hands with glee, as political ferment in the region suits their assorted nefarious ends

Why does Israel have a right to exist as a separate entity?

Hezbollah has nothing to do with Gaza and what is going on there. Hamas are a very different group. I didn't say that Hamas only want open ports for arms. They want their borders open. For instance people in Gaza are not allowed passports and cannot leave the country.

Israel stops ALL exports from Gaza to keep it in poverty. What is the justification of stoppong exports. Businesses can hardly survive in Gaza. Whether arms are brough in or not their borders should be open. No other group of people around the world have these restrictions placed upon them. Hamas do want to improve the lot of the people of Gaza but I would expect they want arms as well. Hamas wants their land back. The Israelis can live there as well, but it is Palestinian land.

who says and who says and who says? - other than you and your clique of dangerous loonies ..... can't determine which bit is the largest load of rubbish i have read in a while, so all much of a muchness ..... clearly some mineral deficiencies in your diets, and probable mental deficiencies too, all leading to psychopathic tendencies

There are plenty of Jews here, in the US and other parts of the world who think Israel should not exist. Israel uses its arms aginst the Palestinians every day. It is only reasonable that they have something to fight back with. You are complaining about the theory that a solution will be by force of arms. Tell that to the Israelis as it is they who believe in that strategy.

Israel is even expelling lawfully elected Palestinian MP from Jerusalem, which is the city where they were born. Israel is illegally revoking their residency. This is in East Jerusalem, which is the Arab part and now illegally occupied by Israel. Currently three MPs are living inside the Red Cross compound where they have been given sacturary for the last cpuple of weeks or so. It will be interesting to see if Israel dares to attack a Red Cross mission.

The Israelis are evicting Arabs from their homes in East Jerusalem and allowing Israeli settlers to take over the homes while Israeli soldiers help them. The former inhabitants have been living in tents often next door to ther houses. This is ethnic cleansing of the same sort that happened in Serbia, Kosovo, Rwanda etc.

This is ethnic cleansing of the same sort that happened in Serbia, Kosovo, Rwanda etc. ....... total and utter twaddle! ...... though i will grant that it is totally reprehensible ...... but do add a little balance by admitting that hamas (and hezbollah) are little better and, given half a chance, would probably act much worse

i live more in hope than expectation

Obviously you expect the Palestinians to just roll over and take what Israel dishes out without defending themselves. Of course it is ethnic cleansing. There have been a number of Israeli documents published recently that detail the plans to take over East Jerusalem make it more Jewish. More than 200,000 Israelis have moved to East Jerusalem since Israel occupied it. More and more Palestinian homes are being demolished. Israel claims they were builtd illegally and without the permission of Israel even though most of the homers predate the Israeli occupation.

groan!
i really shouldn't waste my time on you

try looking up the genocide in rwanda and now compare that with the forced "removal" of some palestinians from their homes .... though as i have said many times, israel's (the israeli gov't to be more precise) actions in many ways and areas are despicable

you really do wreck your whole argument by including the most preposterous exaggerations and other hamas propaganda as if it were gospel

.

hear hear (mille fois, as i am in france) even if some of the above was aimed at me

.

no need to apologise to me at all ...... i know i ruffle feathers from time to time, and as is said, and some would do well to heed, if you can't take it, don't dish it

Proportionate response?

RAMALLAH The Israeli police released an Israeli settler on Sunday only two hours after detaining him on charges of killing a 15-year-old Palestinian child two months ago.

The police announced that the settler, residing in Yitzhar settlement built on Palestinian land in Nablus district, claimed that he fired at the boy Aysar Al-Zaban after stones were thrown at his car.

The statement said that the settler, 37, said that his car was stoned near Birzeit town in Ramallah district, so he stopped the car and fired at the boy leading to his instant death.

Palestinian sources said that the man chased a group of boys and fired at them at the pretext of throwing stones at his car, killing the child on the spot.

Jewish Rambo