driver
- 02 Mar 2006 15:23
Tonker
- 25 Sep 2006 21:10
- 315 of 934
I love shorting new IPO's, I have done so well out of it... This one might be a little risky though, but it looks like there are going to be some developements, as long as things go ok....
Frampton
- 26 Sep 2006 08:28
- 316 of 934
Tonker, surely you mean holding for the short term rather than selling short? "Shorting" and "a good short" implies you are selling rather than buying, but maybe that is what you mean?
Confidant
- 26 Sep 2006 08:32
- 317 of 934
Tonker -- I like your style
moneyplus
- 26 Sep 2006 10:13
- 318 of 934
check out the brilliant figures out today from RCG-not many companies like this out there. should do very well from the next Olympics.
moneyplus
- 26 Sep 2006 10:20
- 320 of 934
will do-thanks ST.
moneyplus
- 26 Sep 2006 12:11
- 322 of 934
blue already ST-thanks.
Tonker
- 26 Sep 2006 19:33
- 324 of 934
Frampton, sorry I am probably useing the wrong term. I like to buy share just after they have floated, and then sell very soon afterwards.... It takes time to pick good stocks to do this with.... Sometimes I sell 2 or 3 mins after purchase, some times I let them run for longer, setting a rolling stop loss of 8%. It is a great specialization, that suits my impatient mind.... I also like buying in to stocks when they are low, and selling high very shortly afterwards.... hopefully..
I should set up a new IPOs thread?
Tonker
- 26 Sep 2006 19:35
- 325 of 934
By the way PetroNeft Resources Plc did not float today, must have been delayed...
Tonker
- 26 Sep 2006 19:37
- 326 of 934
It will be tommorrow, floatation of PetroNeft Resources Plc...
Frampton
- 27 Sep 2006 08:28
- 327 of 934
Thanks for the clarification Tonker, I thought that was probably what you meant. It sounds like a good system, although I have to admit I'm much more of a "buy hold" type investor. As for buying into stocks when they are low and selling when they are high - isn't that what we should all be aiming for?! (not that it always works out that way)
cynic
- 02 Oct 2006 09:07
- 330 of 934
snap driver ..... i posted to that effect on anothere thread devoted to the sector
kimoldfield
- 02 Oct 2006 09:35
- 332 of 934
I can't understand why the USA are against gambling, they've got George Bush as president, surely the biggest gamble of all!! I only hold 1200 Partygaming, which were bought from profits on sale of SBT so I am just holding long term, feel sorry for those caught out today but the sector has never been one for the faint-hearted.
My favourite stocks at the moment are DGT, ERX and SUN. SUN is the least exciting but the one with a solid build and steady increase in T/O etc.
kim
cynic
- 02 Oct 2006 09:50
- 333 of 934
almost certainly because the land-based casino lobby - e.g. Vegas, Atlantic City etc - see a large slab of their profits going out of the door ...... assuredly not a moral issue at stake!
hewittalan6
- 02 Oct 2006 11:37
- 334 of 934
I think you will find, Kim, in the fullness of time that the action has been taken because online gaming has flourished so hugely due to it being a natural home for the simplest money laundering ever.
The anti-money laundering laws are almost completely ineffectual in this environment and that has always been the achilles heel of the industry. Perhaps in the future, it may be back, but for now it must go.
Alan