scussy, you have a pretty good arsenal of protection software already ;-)

My view is that Trojanhunter is cheap and worth having and I have purchased it. However your current tools will probably keep you safe without
it.

thanks spaceman,as you say it's cheap and can save loads if it stops them,it does not seem to slow down my PC with all the security running,
and this is with AMD Athlon XP 2000+,1.67GHz,1.25 GB ram,i will prob get a new PC next year and have it just running my charts,

Could some kind person,tell me what the download link for cmc mm5 spreadbetting software is please ?????

Mega...

MB

Try http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=download+link+for+cmc+mm5+spreadbetting+software+&btnG=Google+Search

MB here I think
http://www.cmcgroupplc.com/cmchelp/uk/spreadbet/market_maker.jsp

Spot on you guys,many thanks for taking your time,enjoy the rest of your weekend !!

Mega...

Anybody have an explanation why my Outlook Express inbox has the paper clip attachment symbol on every message even those without attachments? Something to do with AVG perhaps?
TIA

Kernow, doubt if its AVG, cant remember with OE but some mail clients show html mail as an attachment. Does the the mail have html in it?

Not many Spaceman. Mostly just text. Irritating more than serious I think as AVG nor trojan hunter pick up anything.

Kernow, with AVG I got the attachment paperclip a few weeks ago, but then it stopped. No idea why, but it no longer occurs.

I'm just ordering new PC's for work and need to establish a good backup scheme. To date we've used Zip discs which do incremental as well as full backups. The new machines will be running XP professional.

I need a simple system that my staff can simply point and click. Does anyone know of a good simple system using either CD RW drives or usb memory sticks?

SC

How much data do you want to back up?
How valuable is it?
How much can you afford to spend?

Seymour, will they be networked?, If so it may be worth specing one with several big HDDs to use as a bakcup machine.

Check out Acronis as your backup and restore managaement package, its getting very good reviews and is cheap;


Neil

Optimist, sorry had a busy day. Some of the data is "mission critical" but incremental backups wouldn't fill a CD by any means. Changing the business software so not sure how much data there will be but I don't expect it to be a huge amount. We can store one month's data on 2 CD's at the moment if that's any help. Cost - prefer under 100, given that the main PC is only a 500 machine.

I know you're going to suggest higher spec but chatting to the s/w company they say plenty of folks run this s/w on a low spec machine successfuly so I'm really looking for a cheap and easy solution.

higher spec and low spec machines,great from a optician that is aint it :-)))

Sort of bifocal computer, then.

SC

Incremental backups are fine in theory but in practise when something goes wrong they are a problem to restore and could be impossible should a CD fail.

If you need to use a backup, most times it is going to be after a serious failiure or worse still, someone breaks in at night and relieves you of your computers.

The way that I would set it up for a small network would be to have a central server that controls the domain and could also act as a print server. This machine would not need to be a high spec (early P3 should be OK) but you would have to buy the server OS or learn about Linux.

This would have the advantage that user access would be controlled from the server and you could enable roaming profiles for your users so that all their local data and settings get written back to the server. Most company data should be accessed only from the server.

You would then only need to backup the server each day. The best way to do this would be a tape drive. A DDS3 would give you 24GB which should be able to backup the entire disk. Set the backup to run each night and buy a tape for each day of the month that way you don't have to worry about which tape to use. Store them in a fireproof safe at home.

This backup would need to be run overnight, so you might consider running an additional very quick one of your realy important data that you can take home each evening.

As regards backup software, I have used Backup Exec which is very good but most tape drives will come with an adequate program. You realy need one that will run to a schedule and email you if there are any errors.

Sorry that I've not described a 100 solution, but IMO you can't get away with cutting costs on backing up. I don't think the solution above would be too expensive.

Differential backups are in my opinion a much better option than an incremental backup. They back up everything that has changed since the last complete backup (not since the last incremental backup as in the case of an incremental backup). This means that in the event of a total failure you only have a maximum of two backups to load, the complete backup and the last differential backup. You can rotate media between the differential backups so that even if the last differential backup is unreadable, the last but one will be on a different disk/tape and therefore should be OK. Whatever the solution chosen, buying a number of media and rotating them according to a strict plan is essential for the best protection possible.

Personally I use a 20Gb physical Seagate tape drive (more with compression), monthly complete backups and daily differential backups. I have my PC set to boot automatically in the early hours and the differential backup to complete before I start work each morning. All totally automatic provided the tape is in the drive. The drives can be had for around 100 on eBay, a reasonable set of tapes for as much again.

Mega, MM :-))

Thanks guys. Would a web based solution so one location gathers info from three other sites be practical? I'm thinking about using broadband and my home PC to collect the info. Or am I just making life too difficult by far!!!

SC, you would be limited by the maximum upload speed of the PCs that are being backed up. With current ADSL that would be 256 Mb/s or only 118 MB/hour (theoretical). SDSL would be faster as it is symmetric, cable is too I think, and the upload speeds for ADSL will be upgraded later on in the year subject to your line being able to handle it. Still it's not really going to be a workable solution.