goldfinger
- 09 Jun 2005 12:25
Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).
Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.
cheers GF.
goldfinger
- 25 Oct 2013 13:19
- 31771 of 81564
Hays said this........
Haystack - 25 Oct 2013 12:53 - 31765 of 31771
There is no energy crisis. We pay about the EU average for our energy. The energy companies only make about 4% profit. Out of that, they have to fund new investment. ........................ends.
Now come on Hays get real, we do have an energy crisis. And whats this NEW INVESTMENT????????????????????, in fact the profits have all been pocketed by large shareholders. Hedge funds amongst them.
And answer this when wholesale prices fall why isnt the fall passed onto the consumer?????.
goldfinger
- 25 Oct 2013 13:22
- 31772 of 81564
cynic - 25 Oct 2013 12:59 - 31770 of 31773
i'll shortly be posting a note on the housing market on the relevant thread(s) .....ends
what relevant thread cyners, we dont have a general housing thread do we???????
Post it here so we can pull it apart LOL.
cynic
- 25 Oct 2013 13:27
- 31773 of 81564
fuck off sticky :-)
it's on the ftse and also the chart threads
=================
meanwhile
Grangemouth petrochemicals plant has been saved following a last-minute deal.
It came after the Unite union confirmed it would now "embrace" a survival plan in an effort to reverse a decision by Swiss-based owner Ineos to close the business.
so that militant union, that clearly had little interest in its members' futures or anything else, had its arse kicked, and a bloody good job too
goldfinger
- 25 Oct 2013 13:29
- 31774 of 81564
Osbourne on TV gloating but these are the real figures...............
though manufacturing 9.9% below pre recession peak, construction 12.5% lower
Pathetic bravado presentation coming from the weak chancelor, all 3 years too late.
Fred1new
- 25 Oct 2013 13:30
- 31775 of 81564
Naugthy!
8-)
Hays.
Sub prime?
Think.
goldfinger
- 25 Oct 2013 13:31
- 31776 of 81564
Now come on Cyners please remove the F word. Play the game or we'l have Ian coming on warning. Hes already watching very closely......his words not mine.
cynic
- 25 Oct 2013 13:32
- 31777 of 81564
his beady eye is on YOU i think lol!
Chris Carson
- 25 Oct 2013 13:33
- 31778 of 81564
Fuck Off GF, becoming as boring and repetative as that other knobhead now! Stick to picking stocks.
Haystack
- 25 Oct 2013 13:49
- 31780 of 81564
Why should the energy companies pass on reductions in the wholesale price of energy? They are not charities. Do you expect McDonalds to reduce prices because they can buy meat cheaper. Companies don't normally pass on savings due to reduced costs. It is market forces. They are businesses and the purpose is to make profit for shareholders.
goldfinger
- 25 Oct 2013 13:57
- 31781 of 81564
So Hays when all the poor pensioners cant pay their bills this winter are you going to foot the hospital bills when they are all hospitalised.?????? Itl come out of your tax in the long run and the energy companys will be laughing all the way to the bank.
Come into the real world.
Fred1new
- 25 Oct 2013 13:57
- 31782 of 81564
Hays.
Mcdonalds is not a "necessity" and people can walk to "outlet" or do without.
Energy for the majority is a "necessity" and many of those who use it can't shop around.
Also, in that "energy" permeates almost if not all functioning of society then it is either reasonable to have it "state" owned and managed or the state having the restricted by "unrealistic" or "unreasonable" price hikes.
goldfinger
- 25 Oct 2013 14:03
- 31783 of 81564
They can also use Burgerking Fred. Real competition in that market sadly not in the energy market.
I notice on question time last night majority in audience were in favour of re-nationalisation of energy market.
Haystack
- 25 Oct 2013 14:04
- 31784 of 81564
I did not say that there should be no internentio, just that you can't expect the companies to reduce prices. It is really a question of the intervention. The green levy added by the last Labour government has a lot to do with the high price. Without it, our energy prices would be towards the low end of EU countries. Our green taxes are among the very highest in Europe. It was just an excuse for Labour to tax us more.
goldfinger
- 25 Oct 2013 14:17
- 31785 of 81564
GREEN is the future wether you like it or not.We cannot destroy the earth by just carrying on like we are doing or going backwards like the Tories to coal.
goldfinger
- 25 Oct 2013 14:21
- 31786 of 81564
LOL LOL LOL.....
October 25th, 2013
Quote of the Day
Cameron on the Guardian:
“And the first priority of a prime minister is to help try and keep your country safe, and that means not having some la di da, airy fairy view about what this all means, it’s understanding intelligence and security services do an important job.”
Haystack
- 25 Oct 2013 14:30
- 31787 of 81564
Good quote.
Fred1new
- 25 Oct 2013 14:35
- 31788 of 81564
Hays,
"The green levy added by the last Labour government"
From Cameron your greenest of green PM, "Hug a husky", we are all greeeeeeen now.
Apparently, 60% of green regulations costs have been introduced by the Cameron, who is either has pre-senile dementia or not learning his mantras.
goldfinger
- 25 Oct 2013 14:58
- 31790 of 81564
Hes a liar and even the Tories on the back benchers are wiseing up to him. Surely a PM cant be that incompetent that he doesnt realise he introduced the 60% of regulation costs.