Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

THE TALK TO YOURSELF THREAD. (NOWT)     

goldfinger - 09 Jun 2005 12:25

Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

Haystack - 25 Oct 2013 13:49 - 31780 of 81564

Why should the energy companies pass on reductions in the wholesale price of energy? They are not charities. Do you expect McDonalds to reduce prices because they can buy meat cheaper. Companies don't normally pass on savings due to reduced costs. It is market forces. They are businesses and the purpose is to make profit for shareholders.

goldfinger - 25 Oct 2013 13:57 - 31781 of 81564

So Hays when all the poor pensioners cant pay their bills this winter are you going to foot the hospital bills when they are all hospitalised.?????? Itl come out of your tax in the long run and the energy companys will be laughing all the way to the bank.

Come into the real world.

Fred1new - 25 Oct 2013 13:57 - 31782 of 81564

Hays.

Mcdonalds is not a "necessity" and people can walk to "outlet" or do without.

Energy for the majority is a "necessity" and many of those who use it can't shop around.

Also, in that "energy" permeates almost if not all functioning of society then it is either reasonable to have it "state" owned and managed or the state having the restricted by "unrealistic" or "unreasonable" price hikes.

goldfinger - 25 Oct 2013 14:03 - 31783 of 81564

They can also use Burgerking Fred. Real competition in that market sadly not in the energy market.

I notice on question time last night majority in audience were in favour of re-nationalisation of energy market.

Haystack - 25 Oct 2013 14:04 - 31784 of 81564

I did not say that there should be no internentio, just that you can't expect the companies to reduce prices. It is really a question of the intervention. The green levy added by the last Labour government has a lot to do with the high price. Without it, our energy prices would be towards the low end of EU countries. Our green taxes are among the very highest in Europe. It was just an excuse for Labour to tax us more.

goldfinger - 25 Oct 2013 14:17 - 31785 of 81564

GREEN is the future wether you like it or not.We cannot destroy the earth by just carrying on like we are doing or going backwards like the Tories to coal.

goldfinger - 25 Oct 2013 14:21 - 31786 of 81564

LOL LOL LOL.....

October 25th, 2013


Quote of the Day


Cameron on the Guardian:

“And the first priority of a prime minister is to help try and keep your country safe, and that means not having some la di da, airy fairy view about what this all means, it’s understanding intelligence and security services do an important job.”

Haystack - 25 Oct 2013 14:30 - 31787 of 81564

Good quote.

Fred1new - 25 Oct 2013 14:35 - 31788 of 81564


Hays,

"The green levy added by the last Labour government"

From Cameron your greenest of green PM, "Hug a husky", we are all greeeeeeen now.

Apparently, 60% of green regulations costs have been introduced by the Cameron, who is either has pre-senile dementia or not learning his mantras.






Fred1new - 25 Oct 2013 14:57 - 31789 of 81564

And about time too.

goldfinger - 25 Oct 2013 14:58 - 31790 of 81564

Hes a liar and even the Tories on the back benchers are wiseing up to him. Surely a PM cant be that incompetent that he doesnt realise he introduced the 60% of regulation costs.

Fred1new - 25 Oct 2013 14:59 - 31791 of 81564

Hays,

If security is base on Cameroon understanding we haven't a chance.

Haystack - 25 Oct 2013 15:08 - 31792 of 81564

Fred1new - 25 Oct 2013 15:11 - 31793 of 81564

He is getting ready for take off in time for the next election.

cynic - 25 Oct 2013 15:36 - 31794 of 81564

nuclear energy!

goldfinger - 25 Oct 2013 15:48 - 31795 of 81564

No Tories talking about opening coal mines.

cynic - 25 Oct 2013 15:53 - 31796 of 81564

are world coal prices now higher in real terms than they were say 20 years ago, or even 10 years ago?

yes, there are also different qualities of coal, chinese coal being almost exclusively (i think) with a high sulphur content and therefore "bad news" notwithstanding that modern technology can now strip that out before emission - but it's an expensive process and the chinese couldn't give a toss anyway

personally, i'm all for nuclear power

aldwickk - 25 Oct 2013 15:54 - 31797 of 81564

I notice on question time last night majority in audience were in favour of re-nationalisation of energy market.

Goldfinger

That's because it was broadcast in Liverpool , why wasn't Derick Hatton on the panel, lol

Chris Hutchin's dared to mention immigraytion , one on the panel want off about how it had helped the wealth of this country.

Can't stand that Caroline Flint

cynic - 25 Oct 2013 15:55 - 31798 of 81564

immigration has indeed been of HUGE benefit to this country ..... it's the effects of the open door policy that have been the disaster

aldwickk - 25 Oct 2013 16:03 - 31799 of 81564

So the answer is no
Register now or login to post to this thread.