Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

THE TALK TO YOURSELF THREAD. (NOWT)     

goldfinger - 09 Jun 2005 12:25

Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

cynic - 07 Nov 2013 11:02 - 32352 of 81564

sorry sticky, but while textiles - worsted mills etc etc - were indeed very high quality (Salt's et al) in the end, they generally became too expensive except for the bespoke end ...... Courtaulds were plain incompetent and never moved with the times, and even Liberty (top quality screen printing) also got stuck in history, with the result that much of that business moved to Italy - unsure where it is now

by the way, there was a similar wool-cycle in about 1740 when English broadcloth was superceded by finer merino ..... there was massive hardship in the tradional areas, but thanks to the Methuen family, the Hugenots (i think) were brought in to teach the new techniques

i could rattle on a bit longer if you wanted :-)

goldfinger - 07 Nov 2013 11:04 - 32353 of 81564

I said the bespoke end, ie mens suits.

Cyners post on FTSE board for you.

Fred1new - 07 Nov 2013 11:17 - 32354 of 81564

Cynic,

Blinkered as usual.

Because certain dismal patterns of behaviour repeat themselves, there is no need for them to continue to be.

Even, if you are limited, others don't have have similar restrictions.

But, left to lucky incompetents of such as of your ilk, it seems more likely to be so.

I was told 60 years ago, that when dealing with unions "it was easy to lead donkeys with the hope of food than drive them to the slaughter house".

This seems the difference between some some managements and others and manifested itself during the Thatcher period and is certainly apparent with the present tory party and its adherents.

-----

Hear IDS is playing a blinder.

MaxK - 07 Nov 2013 11:48 - 32355 of 81564

You cant keep blaming the Maggon for the uk's manufacturing woes.

What did Nu Labour do for manufacturing in the 13 years it was in power?

Haystack - 07 Nov 2013 11:56 - 32356 of 81564

Did Thatcher destroy manufacturing? The die had been cast long before she ever came to power. Torn apart by industrial strife, debilitated by decades of stop-go demand management, and wracked by inflation, much of British manufacturing had been rendered globally uncompetitive and was basically beyond redemption.

Large parts of the motor and shipbuilding industries were being kept afloat only through repeated state bailouts. Substantial inward investment had by the end of the Thatcher period partially succeeded in rebuilding the UK motor industry, albeit with foreign money and expertise, and today, levels of car production are again close to record levels. Industrial output was higher when she left office than when she began, and indeed, the manufacturing sector shrunk by more as a proportion of GDP under the last Labour government than it did under her. In any case, British manufacturing is still a greater component of UK output than its French equivalent is of French GDP.

goldfinger - 07 Nov 2013 12:08 - 32357 of 81564

Hays I didnt say she destroyed it I sad she neglected it in favour of the services sector.

Haystack - 07 Nov 2013 12:42 - 32358 of 81564

I don't think she even neglected it. More coal pits were closed by Wilson than by Thatcher. Most of the stories about Thatcher are left wing inventions. Scargill did more to damage industry and industrial relations before or since.

Fred1new - 07 Nov 2013 13:52 - 32359 of 81564

Hays,

The major decline in the "heavy industry" in the last 50 years happened under Thatcher's period in office, She failed the country then and the effects are being felt to-day.

During "its" period she squander the "family" silver and its resources funding "pals" of various shapes and forms for short term advantage.

Perhaps, if she had put in a decent structure controls for the Financial Services they may not have have collapsed.

========

Cynic,

If I am an arsehole then you would seem to be made of the substance I pass through it.

====================

Was IDS one of the previous passing success stories of the recent con party leaders.

Perhaps, he should reapply for his old job.

He certainly seems well qualified for the job.

Fred1new - 07 Nov 2013 13:56 - 32360 of 81564

Interesting.

Some county councils are thought to be raising rates next year.

I wonder what bribe the coalition will offer them not to.


Seems good timing to me.

Fred1new - 07 Nov 2013 14:01 - 32361 of 81564

Should help Wavey Dave's future negotiations in Europe.

Thank the lord he won't be PM in 2017.

Fred1new - 07 Nov 2013 14:03 - 32362 of 81564

Interesting the chairman of the committee enquiring into M15 etc, was one of their own.


It should be a real in depth examination?

Or, is it another fix?

Fred1new - 07 Nov 2013 14:06 - 32363 of 81564

I wonder how many company secrets were "spied on" on the grounds of "keeping us safe from terrorism".

Manuel, they might have been examining your menus!

aldwickk - 07 Nov 2013 14:21 - 32364 of 81564

Its a bit like those old London buses years ago, you wait hours for one to come along, and then comes five

Haystack - 07 Nov 2013 14:21 - 32365 of 81564

what makes you think this?

"Interesting the chairman of the committee enquiring into M15 etc, was one of their own"

Fred1new - 07 Nov 2013 14:52 - 32366 of 81564

DYOH!

Haystack - 07 Nov 2013 15:00 - 32367 of 81564

As usual you are talking out of your arse - something we have come to expect.

MaxK - 07 Nov 2013 15:02 - 32368 of 81564

Haystack - 07 Nov 2013 15:07 - 32369 of 81564

The only thing wrong with the pic that Mili is so far in the pocket as to be almost invisible (together with the rest of the Labour MPs)

Fred1new - 07 Nov 2013 15:24 - 32370 of 81564

Hays.

The relationship of the Unions and the labour party seems to worry the con party more than labour MPs in general and seems to me like a large family with occasional delinquent offspring.

Also, relate back to the buying of marginal seats by pre-election canvassing and printed propaganda funded by non-residents. (I wonder what the results would have been without that funding.)

But I forget the present con party is a party of innocents.

By the way when is Limy sorry Liam, coming back into the party fold.

I think the real distaste of the public, is to have the con party manipulated like puppets from the Cayman Isles and consultations through Andy and Rebecca pillow talks with Rupert Bear.

There is a peculiar miasma around present British politics.

goldfinger - 07 Nov 2013 16:15 - 32371 of 81564

That news article on Councils raising Council Tax will cause most concern for Osbourne as it stated most of the councils planning to put up C Tax were Tory Councils.!!!!!!!.

Dont know why, just heard it half asleep.

Perhaphs they have starved resources so much that they cant even provide sand and grit for the roads this winter.

Certainly Giddeon may be looking at this in a months time at the autunm statement.

In fact I dare bet spending will go up.

Certainly no money savings on Benefits in fact looks like £450 million to be written off. I D Smith and Ester from Liverpool !!should get the chop, that dept as gone all wrong since Greyson left it and he was certainly a bit thick.
Register now or login to post to this thread.