peeyam
- 26 Aug 2009 13:00
ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND GROUP PLC is within a rising trend. Continued positive development within the trend channel is indicated. The stock has broken up through the resistance at pence 50.00. A further rise to 100p (1) is predicted in the medium term. The stock is assessed as technically positive for the medium long term.
Good luck -
TANKER
- 14 Dec 2011 12:31
- 325 of 847
the point being this IF THE BANKS DO NOT GET BACK TO WORKING .
then the countrys will never get back to growth then the problems start big time riots
this will not happen THE BANKS WILL RETURN TO GROWTH and it will start next year
skinny
- 14 Dec 2011 16:16
- 326 of 847
Well finally been filled - hopefully that is it!
Time Traveller
- 14 Dec 2011 16:54
- 327 of 847
Skinny, what's your average on RBS now?
Mine is way too high at 33.25 but I bought some time ago before the latest "Credit Crunch" and uro disaster!
TT
skinny
- 15 Dec 2011 07:15
- 328 of 847
Hi TT, my average is 35.5 (42 for LLOY). RBS are in an old ISA that I don't add cash to any more, so I only invest on a sale or dividend.
ahoj
- 15 Dec 2011 07:56
- 329 of 847
FSA to announce relaxation on mortgage lending
http://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/FSA-announce-relaxation-tele-1597872151.html?x=0
TANKER
- 20 Dec 2011 08:46
- 330 of 847
have sold OSBORNE has destoyed this bank now ,
has i have said the CONSERVATIVE party are finished
2517GEORGE
- 20 Dec 2011 09:02
- 331 of 847
Crikey TANKER you seem to be in and out of various shares so often, and usually at a loss, good job you can afford to stand the losses.
2517
mitzy
- 20 Dec 2011 09:05
- 332 of 847
1000's of staff let go next year.
ahoj
- 20 Dec 2011 09:11
- 333 of 847
The Government has diluted a key element of its crackdown on British banks in the wake of threats by HSBC to move its headquarters out of Britain.
George Osborne announced a string of reforms yesterday designed to increase bank stability and reduce the chances of taxpayers having to bail out troubled banks again.
The Chancellor said that he was implementing the main recommendations of Sir John Vickers, the chairman of the Independent Commission on Banking, including the ring-fencing of high street banking operations.
However, rules to force banks to set aside huge amounts of additional loss-absorbing capital have been adjusted in a way that could help HSBC, in particular, banking experts said.
Sir John envisaged large banks being forced to build loss-absorbing cushions equivalent to at least 17 per cent of their worldwide assets.
But in his formal response yesterday, Mr Osborne said that the new formula need not apply to non-British assets so long as the bank could show there was no risk to British taxpayers.
ahoj
- 20 Dec 2011 09:14
- 334 of 847
Assets outside UK can be excluded from the formula. so, it is not that bad.
The economical situation is very dynamic. North Korea does not need any mor weapon. Will move towards democracy. Not good for the big army over there. They should go back home.
2517GEORGE
- 20 Dec 2011 09:17
- 335 of 847
From an investment point of view whilst it will make the banks less risky, future returns will be lower than those enjoyed a few years ago.
2517
TANKER
- 20 Dec 2011 09:22
- 336 of 847
just befrore i go when is HESTOR now going to resign has we now no that it is the simpleton OSBORNE WHO IS RUNNING THE BANK is hands are tied what muppet would want that or is hestor only in it for is salary
mitzy
- 20 Dec 2011 09:37
- 337 of 847
A dull bank of the future.
2517GEORGE
- 20 Dec 2011 09:41
- 338 of 847
I have been extremely fortunate in having a non interrupted working life, ie never unemployed or having to claim benefits, however it doesn't matter how many pats on the back or commendations you get, it is money that pays the bills and governs your lifestyle, and I imagine that Hestor is no different to the vast majority of us, he 'works' for the money, it is the best (only) motivator.
2517
mnamreh
- 20 Dec 2011 09:44
- 339 of 847
.
ahoj
- 20 Dec 2011 09:45
- 340 of 847
We all work for money. However some people do not bother about others and can do crime (direct or indirect) to gain and do not bother about the effect on their peers.
Is he one of them?
TANKER
- 20 Dec 2011 10:12
- 341 of 847
I only gamble for my money these days but i did work for serveral big companys
and the reason i left the last one was a young guy with contacts in the directors
but was has thick as a blank i refused to assit him and told them to stick it .
in the next few weeks of going i was contacted 5 times any one who likes being a puppet might as well kill them selfs after 9 months he was sacked he cost the company thousands jobs for the boys destoys companys and so does workers who are to scared to speak out like at rbs goodwin did what he did because of bad staff not speaking out
TANKER
- 20 Dec 2011 14:44
- 342 of 847
rbs will have too have a share consolidation when they sellmost of the company
be very careful
2517GEORGE
- 20 Dec 2011 15:50
- 343 of 847
Been out for a while,----mnamreh, I can't think of many cases where people work for the sheer love of the job other than those who are wealthy enough not to have to worry about money, after all without it you can do nowt.
2517
mnamreh
- 20 Dec 2011 15:57
- 344 of 847
.