driver
- 02 Mar 2006 15:23
kimoldfield
- 02 Oct 2006 11:51
- 335 of 934
I wouldn't bet on it coming back Alan!
kim
kimoldfield
- 02 Oct 2006 11:51
- 336 of 934
Well........someone had to say it!
hewittalan6
- 02 Oct 2006 11:55
- 337 of 934
Ouch!!!!
Flackwell Vialli
- 10 Oct 2006 20:16
- 339 of 934
Spotted SOLA too, soul trader and took a small holding today - the figures and growth are incredible, and even if these slow down still represent value for money - surely has to be in the right market, with sales largely guaranteed, and a good supply line.
Flackwell Vialli
- 10 Oct 2006 20:27
- 341 of 934
Driver - If you work with the latest quarter actual profits of $5m - ie an annualised $20m what PE ratio would you assign?
You would have noted that in itself the 2nd Qtr shows sales growth in XS of 100%.
Add to that an ever increasing capacity (+50% ish by todays RNS) of which 90% is already pre-sold, at a GM of over 30%, and it all looks too good to be true.
Flackwell Vialli
- 11 Oct 2006 07:31
- 343 of 934
Depends on your definition of "long" imo.
However, equally my opinion is that this one is heading north, albeit with the usual pull backs along the way - would expect one within 2 days as some people sell, but the ascent is on.
Flackwell Vialli
- 11 Oct 2006 07:33
- 344 of 934
Depends on your definition of "long" imo.
However, equally my opinion is that this one is heading north, albeit with the usual pull backs along the way - would expect one within 2 days as some people sell, but the ascent is on.
soul traders
- 11 Oct 2006 11:37
- 345 of 934
Driver,
Please see below my post 89 from the SOLA thread:
"Afternoon all. Just by way of giving the pot a stir, I've been exchanging a few thoughts about eventual earnings over on the other BB. SOLA should hit output of 125MW-worth of PV cells sometime in 2007.
A fag-packet calculation suggests the figures for a theoretical financial year sometime betweem 2007 - 2008 could add up as follows (based on figures lifted from the recent quarterlies):
full-year's EPS just over 40p,
on production of 125MW-worth of product,
for an SP of 568p a share,
at an arbitrary but hopefully reasonable PE of 14."
END QUOTE
Divide 568p by 125 and multiply by 180 to arrive at 817p
I am basing my figures on the Interim Results (see FT.com), in which it is made claer that profit for the second quarter (three months ended 30Jun2006) was US$5.0 million, on 8MW of production.
Scale this up for 180MW, ignoring any economies of scale and you arrive at US112.5 million profit (and there is no tax to be paid in, I believe, the first three years), or 59.2 million (if $: = 1.9:1).
Use PE 14 again and you come out at 828 mil market cap.
Disagreements are welcome.
IMO, PDYOR, etc.
cynic
- 11 Oct 2006 12:38
- 350 of 934
am currently out of SOLA (profitably!) as wanted funds for indices and SHP, both of which served me very nicely ..... am quite sure i shall be back into SOLA in due course, but shall wait for a bad day or two .... think the markets are due for a bit of quite heavy profit taking as have been strong for last week
should have reiterated my thanks to soul* for pointing me in the right direction several weeks ago
Flackwell Vialli
- 11 Oct 2006 18:23
- 352 of 934
Soul T - Thanks for the forecasts re:SOLA
My posting was meant to show that the valuation was reasonable on an "as is" basis, never mind the additional capacity announced yesterday. What is good to see is the sales costs to profit ratios, the volumes pre-sold, the additional capacity being brought on line, the supply chain being tightened etc etc.
What remains a risk includes currency, customer satisfaction levels, medium term demand, overseas listing etc.
But each to their own risk-reward ratio