Fred1new
- 07 Dec 2005 16:40
This board has been a little to quiet for while.
Is it time that Bush and Blair who is a close friend and confidant of Bush were tried for War Crimes?
Do you think the use by the American Administrations of renditions are War Crimes and committed with full knowledge of American and British leaders ie. Blair and Bush and they are ultimately responsible?
Also in the aftermath of the illegal invasion of Iraq are should their action seen to be as the provocation for the rising toll of British, American and Iraqi deaths.
As a result of the military intervention in Iraq do you think you are safer in Britain to-day?
Do you think one should expect government leaders and ministers who have been responsible for massive foreseeable casualties should visit the hospitals to meet the casualties they have produced directly or indirectly by their actions?
explosive
- 13 Feb 2006 20:04
- 337 of 1327
Bling - "When the Army guys who gave the teenagers a kicking (2 years back?) are brought to trial- and I bet 100% they will be found guilty-can we please forget Asia Minor for a week or so and have the media, government, judiciary, loony-left etc., give the same prominence to the UK muggings, happy slappings etc.,then build some more prisons, and make our streets as safe as they once were." Excellent Point.... However prison isn't the answer, I'd like to see National Service brought back but as part-punishment with existing programmes. It may well yet prove to be the force to break some criminals ways.
Haystack
- 16 Mar 2006 17:57
- 338 of 1327
Good to see US is bombing Iraq again.
Fred1new
- 16 Mar 2006 18:27
- 339 of 1327
They are trying to win the hearts and minds of the Iraqis and Palestinians.
I do hope there is something in the saying "as you sow, so will you reap.
This applies to Bush and Blair. I wonder if it would be possible to bring them to the Hague for Trial for "war crimes".
Haystack
- 16 Mar 2006 18:28
- 340 of 1327
Not a chance. (they are not guilty anyway).
Fred1new
- 16 Mar 2006 18:31
- 341 of 1327
They would be if I was the judge.
Haystack
- 16 Mar 2006 19:46
- 342 of 1327
Luckily you are not.
aldwickk
- 16 Mar 2006 23:03
- 343 of 1327
God will judge them, so watch out for bolts of lightning landing on the White house & No 10.
Haystack
- 16 Mar 2006 23:15
- 344 of 1327
I suppose that might be possible if there were a god.
Fred1new
- 16 Mar 2006 23:59
- 345 of 1327
Haystack, Don't talk disrespectfully of me or I will send you one of ald's bolts of lightning.
Kivver
- 20 Mar 2006 08:55
- 346 of 1327
40 to 50 iragis being killed every day, the very reason millions of us didnt want our troops to get involved. They have the toughest if not an impossible job of bringing all these different factions together and now looking like we our slowly going to get our troops out and leave them on get on with it.
Im learning a lot about people and all this trust in god business. Good friends of mine recently had a kitchen fitted in the middle of nowhere in wales. Everyday the bloke doing the job talked about god, going to church on sundays and quoting the bible. It turned out the stuff he was using was discontinued seconds!! In the end he did a runner with all the money and not finishing the job. There is no eveidence of wher he lives. 2 years later the units are falling to bits, all the paint/vinyl is peeling off, the cooker is melting the fridge etc etc. I wonder if god will judge him.
Also read the the axm thread where onechunkymonkey tried the same tactic and told me, he and jiggles where different people. OCM said he was going away but biggles as disappeared to. People who do this are disgrace.
Fred1new
- 20 Mar 2006 09:24
- 347 of 1327
It is alright, Tony will solve the Iraq problem by appointing leading Iraqis to the House of Lords (for a small share of Oil Funds). Of course the palace will be rather full with Cherie and all the Bush Administration accept their places.
The properties being bought by in London are for temporary housing for the political Iraqi asylum seekers.
maestro
- 20 Mar 2006 17:08
- 348 of 1327
if you watch this film you will understand how we have been hoodwinked into an illegal war..you can buy it on Ebay ..just search 9/11 dvd
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8260059923762628848&q=9-11+Loose+Change
By the way i hope we get intelligent open minded discussion on here and not the mindless rubbish that is posted on advfn...and this is my first time here so treat me gently
Kivver
- 20 Mar 2006 17:19
- 349 of 1327
we already have pages of debate maestro, have you read any of it?????
maestro
- 20 Mar 2006 17:25
- 350 of 1327
kivver...no not yet...like i said first time here...my computer is being attacked on advfn so have cancelled my subscription
hewittalan6
- 20 Mar 2006 17:32
- 351 of 1327
Always the devils advocate, maestro, I could make an entirely convincing (and fictitious) film showing how just and deserved the war was. Its not quite Empirical Evidence.
Despite all the debate, I am yet to understand how the world would have been a better, more just place, with that cuddly little rogue Saddam still in place.
Those against the war argue such things as Truth, Justice and Freedom. The sun will rise tomorrow and truth will be as slippery and hard to find as ever, I doubt there will be an awful lot of Justice in the world and I am certain you will not find freedom. However i am equally certain that Saddam will be under lock and key, and we are all better for it.
Dont forget. the atrocities you read about every day, of market places car bombed and police stations torched are perpetrated by other Iraqis. Not the allies. The airstrikes and attacks are done to bring these atrocities to an end.
To read some of the media (and some of the posts on here) you would think the CIA are crawling around Iraq, with heavy suntans and wearing a dish-dash, planting bombs everywhere.
Alan
maestro
- 20 Mar 2006 17:45
- 352 of 1327
alan...yes but was it worth mudering 3000 in the twin towers to get rid of Saddam...ask that to the people who lost loved ones in the twin towers...by the way the film is full of factual evidence unlike the 9/11 Commission report that was drawn up by crooked masons and bent politicians
hewittalan6
- 20 Mar 2006 17:56
- 353 of 1327
The film is full of ALLEGEDLY factual evidence.
One of the things that would have prevented Saddam and Iraq from ever becoming a real nightmare is the legal ability to challenge the regime in an independant court of law, and if not in that country, then in an independant one. A challange in Iraq would lead to a very short and predictable future.
The argument put forward then is simple. if the film is true and the commission false, then why is the most litagious country in the world not full of challenges to the authorities? Why is our beloved UK not hauled before the multitudes of European legal beaurocrats?
because there is no evidence at all worth answering.
For those that believe it is all a big put up, by sunglassed men in smokey rooms, I leave you to your JFK theories and working out what really happened at Roswell. No amount of debate will convince you otherwise.
Alan
maestro
- 20 Mar 2006 18:09
- 354 of 1327
WTC7 building was not hit by a plane yet fell in 8 seconds ...what more proof do you need?..that one event should sentence the US Conspirators to a long jail sentence or lethal injection...tell me how did a bunch of ragheads manage to 'pull' the WTC7 BUILDING without getting caught?...did they parachute out of the planes just before impact and then somehow guided themselves on top of WTC7 and then planted bombs from their rucksacks?
Kivver
- 20 Mar 2006 18:11
- 355 of 1327
i would love to go iraq and ask the people which era they prefer, now or then. times the number of people dead, murdered, disabled, destroyed, or distraught by their number of friends and relatives. I dont think for one minute iraqis would say they prefer now. even the iraqis that were with us and the states are slowly turning against us. i think the best thing would be to break it up into 5 different countries, but wh'll get the bits with the oil in (which of course its got absolutely nothing to do with)?? People soon forget Iraqi people are people just like me and you and im not sure everyone thinks that. i bet every single one us wouldnt like it to happen in our back yard.
one other thing worth remembering under sadam the majority were the minority (when it came to power). Iraqis bombing iraqis is the exact reason some us didnt want the war because we knew this would happen, the factions are so different and miles apart, culturely, morally and politically.
hewittalan6
- 20 Mar 2006 18:33
- 356 of 1327
All far too "badge man" for me, Maestro. Why is it so difficult for the vocal minority of this country to accept that Muslims / iraqis have just as much right to be stupid, murderous and cowardly as we in the west?
Kivver, you propose a motion of allowing anyone, anywhere in the world to do whatever takes their fancy to any human being alive, providing its not you or yours. Humanitarian?
Splitting up Iraq will bring the same silly liberalist cries that followed India, Ireland, Cyprus et al.
Only the media turn against us, in order to sell papers. that is not any justification at all.
If you wish to conduct a straw poll in Iraq, please ask the Kurds and Shi-ites who suffered the tyranny. As you point out, they are the majority, and I think you will find they acknowledge the hardship and short term loss, but also the long term hope and future. Hope and future are things they did not know existed under Saddam.
Perhaps you are right, though. So when a despot seizes power in this country (No silly jokes we are a democracy) and declares everyone born or bred in the West Midlands to be fit for nothing more than slavery or target practice, you will happily accept your fate and not pray for the day the world rids us of that tyranny, regardless of cost?
Alan