Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

Give yourself a treat G/F, And have a look at this -): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k6MJ8wSoLIk

hmmm goldfinger, even the sick pictures he posts resemble the past.

Hays I choose to do that to help other people especially newcomers. Are you saying i have positions in all the charts i post. Stop talking bunkum.

Question hays. have you ever thought of helping other people outside your immediate family.???????????????

Can you please keep, that rubbish off here Stan. :-))

Stan i repect you but havent looked.

You have not missed much. Put a decent football team on here Stan. :-))

Hurry up hays united are on.....................probably losing. So depressing.

gf

Maybe it might be instructive to give you a bit of history regarding MoneyAm


Bullshare was the MD of ADVFN. I knew him from there. I attended many of his seminars on day trading, charting etc. I also knew Clem at ADVFN. Clem and Mike had a falling out and Mike left.

I had known Mighty Micro (Derek Lambert) since 1967. I went to see him to do some business consultancy for him regarding the way forward for his company IST. I found that he had a product called DeltaStream that could stream small changes to data. It had been designed for one purpose but I realised that it could be used to stream financial data.

I contacted Mike and asked him to visit Derek to look at the business. Mike briefly became the Chairman of IST and then left to be the MD of MoneyAm and IST built the system we all use now.

Ohhh Stan ill have a look , this isnt huddersfield beating Burnley is it????

Hays ....what on earth do you think I am.

I knew all about that.

Clem who follows me on Twitter is a great bloke just like Mike, it was a big thing at the time. In fact at marketing does it was very frosty I WAS THEIR.

Advfn have always been frosty to this site because of Mike.

I Know more than you bud.

Thats got nothing to do with the original question.

You were asking what have I done for anyone. I got Mike and Derek together for nothing. Just a favour.

By the way i also am a greart pal of Evil knievil Simon Cawkwell.

I seem to think you have missed out a period of history on the stock market between 2003 and NOW.

Hey, both of you.

I knew somebody once who said he knew God.

I didn't feel any better from knowing him!


8-)

Aplogies Hays....... youn didnt say that....

Haystack - 10 Dec 2013 18:28 - 33918 of 33919
You were asking what have I done for anyone. I got Mike and Derek together for nothing. Just a favour.........................ends,
.

ohhh dear Im glad you had a go hays .......well done. I know the hate that was around at the time.

I was their hays right at the start of the Dot Com boom. Well before it actually.

I made a fortune and Im talking big big 7 figure numbers ......big numbers.

Anyway hays youve gone of the point that we should all stick up for each other.

I know this i would you.

And yes I would, and dont think just because you are protected by management you are free.

Ive seen youn struggling on the BLNX thread.

Hey hays did you used to post on the STREET board.

What about UK invest?????????


hey and their was hemscott.

Plus aswel.

I have no need of protection from posters. Most are just mildly irritating fruit flies. I always take a very mild stance with them.

I have posted on most sites over the years and the one before ADVFN - ESI or whatever it was called.

€-turd

By John Bingham, and David Barrett

8:10PM GMT 10 Dec 2013





The population of Britain could more than double in the next century unless immigration is tightly controlled, according to official estimates showing it could grow 40 per cent faster than previously thought.


Only weeks after the Office for National Statistics predicted that the UK will have 10 million more people within the next 25 years, it published new estimates showing that the true figure could be four million higher.


The dramatic upward revision suggests the population of Britain could rise from its current record level of 63.7 million to just under 78 million by 2037.


On the same projection it could reach and as much as 132 million by this time next century.


That would mean that the UK would pass the milestone of 70 million people – a figure once considered controversial and which some politicians have suggested might never be passed, by around 2024 – at least four years earlier than previously predicted.

Frank Field, the former Labour Cabinet minister, claimed the higher estimate could be just the start of the revisions as statistics become more accurate.

He said it showed that fears among voters about immigration which he said had long been played down by politicians were now being borne out by figures.

Mr Field warned that the result could wreak havoc with the NHS, schools and the housing crisis.

He said: “At a time when political parties are being committed to longer term controls on public expenditure where would the money come from for hospitals, for housing, for schools?

“We have already got a growing crisis in maternity services.”

The upward revision is contained in a report by the ONS setting out “variant” population projections.

Britain already has the fastest growing population in Europe, fuelled by mass immigration during the last decade and a baby boom, itself linked to the fact that working migrants tend to be the age at which to start a family.

The ONS’s main prediction is still that Britain is on course to reach 73.3 million by 2037 – a rate which would take the population to 93.3 million by 2112.

But statisticians have produced a series of alternative scenarios based on different assumptions about the levels of immigration, life expectancy and the birth rate.

They suggest that the population will be between 71.4 million and 77.7 million by 2037.

If higher levels of migration, life expectancy and birth rate are all factored in the, UK population would then soar to 77.7 million within 25 years and 93 million within 50 years. It would then reach 110.9 million by 2087 before hitting 131.9 million in 2112.

At that rate England alone would have a population of 96.5 million in 2087 and a third of England’s population would be over 65 by 2072.

“Due to the inherent uncertainty of demographic behaviour, any set of projections will inevitably be proved wrong, to a greater or lesser extent, as a forecast of future demographic events or population structure,” the ONS explained.

Mr Field said the figures suggested politicians ahd been burying their heads in the sand about the impact of immigration.

He likened the optimism among the political about the impact of population growth to the attitudes which gave rise to appeasement in the run-up to the Second World War.

“The British political leadership have a characteristic of not wishing to face up to what is happening until very late in the day.

“If you look at the biggest crisis we have had over the last century, particularly about the European situation, almost to the very end people thought hat there would not be a war - our ability to fool ourselves is very considerable.

“The public were much more prepared for what was coming.

“The worry is that as the statistics become more able to predict what appeared not long ago to be unknowable and the time and unthinkable, they are getting more accurate – I don’t think this is the last.”