Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

THE TALK TO YOURSELF THREAD. (NOWT)     

goldfinger - 09 Jun 2005 12:25

Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

Fred1new - 17 Dec 2013 12:14 - 34172 of 81564

Hays,


I would put the comment down to Welsh Humour.

By the way what is your real world?

Shortie - 17 Dec 2013 12:22 - 34173 of 81564

Haystack "One of his lecturers announced at the start of the term that he was a Marxist and would do his best to convert them all."

Not such a bad thing, the analysis of crisis in capitalism v's the credit crunch we've just experienced is a valid arguement, proven you could argue by the US massive QE exercise still happening..

cynic - 17 Dec 2013 12:24 - 34174 of 81564

shame you didn't absorb those lessons then ..... indeed, some may consider you a complete numpty who did very little of use after being discharged from an education which failed you

Fred1new - 17 Dec 2013 12:45 - 34175 of 81564

Cynic,

In spite of being dyslexic and being told I was lazy and scraping along the bottom of the result tables until in my twenties. Then, I recognised my problems and found ways around the problem and did surprisingly well academically and was more than expectedly rewarded for what I did.

Talking with school day friends the other day, they said they couldn't understand my supporting role in the class results table. (Other than sciences.)

----

One thing which did annoy that head and others was that I could beat them at chess. (Even when playing with my left hand.)

Pity, they didn't look at the reason for my "paper failings". (Other members of the family had dyslexic traits, but recognised and have done well academically.)

I still can't spell "academically" properly the first time.

=======


PS.

I blame myself for my "failings" unlike this failing government and you seem to do.

It seem it was always somebody else's fault, perhaps Mummy's or Daddy's.


cynic - 17 Dec 2013 12:50 - 34176 of 81564

please identify where i have blamed anyone other than myself for my mistakes ...... 1000/1 says you won't find any

what diff does it makes whether you move chess pieces with your left or right hand?
i can certainly find my mouth with either, and when i was more supple, with either foot too

Fred1new - 17 Dec 2013 12:53 - 34177 of 81564

PS>

Forgot.

Eton and such were used as surrogate parents.

Perhaps. those institutions could be blamed.

I understand where the scapegoat and blame culture comes from.

Fred1new - 17 Dec 2013 13:06 - 34178 of 81564

As far as right and left handed chess players they look at the board from a different angle.















8-)

doodlebug4 - 17 Dec 2013 13:12 - 34179 of 81564

Isn't it the job of teachers & lecturers to deliver facts and encourage learning and debate among students, rather than preach their own opinionated doctrines?

cynic - 17 Dec 2013 13:13 - 34180 of 81564

ah - so you can't find any examples of where i blame others for my mistakes or shortcomings .... well there's a surprise

with regards to eton, and similar (very) high grade educational establishments, you have clearly not done your homework properly but merely trotted out the party dogma (now there's a surprise)

many public schools now offer full or weekly boarding or day
assuredly boarding does not suit all, but where it does, there's a great deal to be said for it

further, the top schools offer a very high standard indeed across all aspects and fields that can loosely be called educational, and that is why entry to them remains very competitive indeed

whether or not it is fair that such schools are generally only available to those with deep wallets is another matter entirely
however, it is certainly true that many parents will scrimp and save to send their children to such schools, for they perceive them to offer a (far) better education in all its senses than those available to them in the state system

Fred1new - 17 Dec 2013 13:26 - 34181 of 81564

Manuel.

Refer you back to remark, "it was not the educational establishment that failed me, but rather my own lack of application and stupidity in not recognising the multitude of opportunities presented"

----------------------

Perhaps, in some cases, the material used by some of these "institutions" has been found wanting.

cynic - 17 Dec 2013 13:51 - 34182 of 81564

certainly that particular school did not especially suit me nor me it, but that was more than 50 years ago ......

on the other hand, my 2 sons went to a different school, but also boarded (my daughter did not), and i have nothing but the highest praise for that establishment ..... both are very different in all ways, and yet the school drew out the best in them; exactly what one would hope for

the same applied to my daughter

Fred1new - 17 Dec 2013 13:54 - 34183 of 81564

Define "best".

Were you or your children escaping?


Mine frequently wished to.


cynic - 17 Dec 2013 14:01 - 34184 of 81564

ok - to salve your pedantics ..... both (all 3) exceeded their obvious potential
a certain amount of luck involved, as one can only take a view (educated guess!) as to which school looks mutually best suited

Fred1new - 17 Dec 2013 14:23 - 34185 of 81564

Improvements must be down to their mothers input.


With my children, the inputs put down to me seem to have been scanty. Must check that.

Any negative traits are said to be down to me. But they can't have it both ways or can they.


8-)

cynic - 17 Dec 2013 14:53 - 34186 of 81564

my children learnt their charm from me; exactly how NOT to do it :-)

Fred1new - 17 Dec 2013 15:13 - 34187 of 81564


With Planes zooming over Heathrow it is time to have a reminder:

cynic - 17 Dec 2013 15:35 - 34188 of 81564

out of curiosity, where would you increase airport capacity or would you not bother?
if the latter, then your latest mistress would surely disagree

Stan - 17 Dec 2013 15:49 - 34189 of 81564

Never mind more, lets just improve what we have now. That go's for everything.

MaxK - 17 Dec 2013 15:57 - 34190 of 81564

I don't see what the problem is with expanding airport capacity.

"they" say we have to, or we will lose out on trade etc.

Heathrow is chocker, but Stanstead and Gatwick are not (yet), why not expand the existing? They already have the transport infrastructure.

cynic - 17 Dec 2013 15:59 - 34191 of 81564

stansted is certainly a dog to get to but gtw is on the shortlist for extra capacity (runway)


Stan - how do you "improve" if there is insufficient physical air/runway space to do so?
Register now or login to post to this thread.