goldfinger
- 09 Jun 2005 12:25
Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).
Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.
cheers GF.
Fred1new
- 17 Dec 2013 13:06
- 34178 of 81564
As far as right and left handed chess players they look at the board from a different angle.
8-)
doodlebug4
- 17 Dec 2013 13:12
- 34179 of 81564
Isn't it the job of teachers & lecturers to deliver facts and encourage learning and debate among students, rather than preach their own opinionated doctrines?
cynic
- 17 Dec 2013 13:13
- 34180 of 81564
ah - so you can't find any examples of where i blame others for my mistakes or shortcomings .... well there's a surprise
with regards to eton, and similar (very) high grade educational establishments, you have clearly not done your homework properly but merely trotted out the party dogma (now there's a surprise)
many public schools now offer full or weekly boarding or day
assuredly boarding does not suit all, but where it does, there's a great deal to be said for it
further, the top schools offer a very high standard indeed across all aspects and fields that can loosely be called educational, and that is why entry to them remains very competitive indeed
whether or not it is fair that such schools are generally only available to those with deep wallets is another matter entirely
however, it is certainly true that many parents will scrimp and save to send their children to such schools, for they perceive them to offer a (far) better education in all its senses than those available to them in the state system
Fred1new
- 17 Dec 2013 13:26
- 34181 of 81564
Manuel.
Refer you back to remark, "it was not the educational establishment that failed me, but rather my own lack of application and stupidity in not recognising the multitude of opportunities presented"
----------------------
Perhaps, in some cases, the material used by some of these "institutions" has been found wanting.
cynic
- 17 Dec 2013 13:51
- 34182 of 81564
certainly that particular school did not especially suit me nor me it, but that was more than 50 years ago ......
on the other hand, my 2 sons went to a different school, but also boarded (my daughter did not), and i have nothing but the highest praise for that establishment ..... both are very different in all ways, and yet the school drew out the best in them; exactly what one would hope for
the same applied to my daughter
Fred1new
- 17 Dec 2013 13:54
- 34183 of 81564
Define "best".
Were you or your children escaping?
Mine frequently wished to.
cynic
- 17 Dec 2013 14:01
- 34184 of 81564
ok - to salve your pedantics ..... both (all 3) exceeded their obvious potential
a certain amount of luck involved, as one can only take a view (educated guess!) as to which school looks mutually best suited
Fred1new
- 17 Dec 2013 14:23
- 34185 of 81564
Improvements must be down to their mothers input.
With my children, the inputs put down to me seem to have been scanty. Must check that.
Any negative traits are said to be down to me. But they can't have it both ways or can they.
8-)
cynic
- 17 Dec 2013 14:53
- 34186 of 81564
my children learnt their charm from me; exactly how NOT to do it :-)
cynic
- 17 Dec 2013 15:35
- 34188 of 81564
out of curiosity, where would you increase airport capacity or would you not bother?
if the latter, then your latest mistress would surely disagree
Stan
- 17 Dec 2013 15:49
- 34189 of 81564
Never mind more, lets just improve what we have now. That go's for everything.
MaxK
- 17 Dec 2013 15:57
- 34190 of 81564
I don't see what the problem is with expanding airport capacity.
"they" say we have to, or we will lose out on trade etc.
Heathrow is chocker, but Stanstead and Gatwick are not (yet), why not expand the existing? They already have the transport infrastructure.
cynic
- 17 Dec 2013 15:59
- 34191 of 81564
stansted is certainly a dog to get to but gtw is on the shortlist for extra capacity (runway)
Stan - how do you "improve" if there is insufficient physical air/runway space to do so?
Stan
- 17 Dec 2013 16:03
- 34192 of 81564
It's not the only place where planes land, tell them they will have to land on another one or wait.
cynic
- 17 Dec 2013 16:05
- 34193 of 81564
now that's a really bright answer
create extra space by taking out 3 lanes on M25 perhaps?
Stan
- 17 Dec 2013 16:21
- 34194 of 81564
No, that's the correct answer.
cynic
- 17 Dec 2013 16:36
- 34195 of 81564
so you'ld divert planes all over the place and/or let them stack until they run out of fuel?
Fred1new
- 17 Dec 2013 16:38
- 34196 of 81564
What is against Birmingham Airport?
(Other than it is bloody unsocial to picking up and dropping off passengers.
They make a charge, if this is done by car or similar.)
=======
But it is UK central with future good train connections.
I suppose the NIMBYS or old reactionaries.
I rarely if ever fly, don't like the delays to getting to the airport, booking in and out and the B. walk to the planes. etc.
Prefer sitting in my RV, reading a book, or watching the world go by, while drinking fresh coffee and eating fresh toasted buns.
cynic
- 17 Dec 2013 16:56
- 34197 of 81564
if one built HS2 b'ham just might work, but much will depend on its location and ability to cope with a lot more traffic
i'm sure it must have been looked at along with manchester and leeds/bradford but found badly wanting for whatever reasons
an RV is what?
a campervan or more like a winnebago?
i agree that flying can be a pain, so if i go to paris or calais, then the train is by far the quickest and easiest
however, provence and the like is far too tiring and hard work and everything else by road
rotterdam is impossible other than by air, and the same applies to a great many cities even in nearby europe