goldfinger
- 09 Jun 2005 12:25
Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).
Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.
cheers GF.
Fred1new
- 18 Dec 2013 14:06
- 34263 of 81564
GF,
From the other thread
"Ian, this chrome browser as certainly speeded things up but graphics look a bit tinny compared to IExplorer. is this a common thing?."
If you still have problems try this.
Cursor on page
Ctrl + repeat as necessary
Ctrl - repeat as necessary
Should provide some of your wishes!
8-)
cynic
- 18 Dec 2013 14:17
- 34264 of 81564
sticky - don't waste your time on samsun (mrsi) ...... he can just be conveniently ignored
doodlebug4
- 18 Dec 2013 14:50
- 34265 of 81564
'You're sitting next to a turkey!': Cameron ridicules Miliband over warning Ed Balls has nine months to save his job
Shadow Cabinet insiders insist Miliband can be 'ruthless' with whole team
Balls under pressure after dismal performance at the Autumn Statement
He turned red and lost his way while colleagues looked uncomfortable
Shadow Chancellor has until party conference in September to improve
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2525697/Ed-Balls-given-9-months-save-job-Miliband-urged-sack-shadow-chancellor-fears-damaging-Labours-image.html#ixzz2nq1glEep
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
Stan
- 18 Dec 2013 14:55
- 34266 of 81564
Don't some of you Tories ever read anything other then the usual dross publications that Murdoch or the Daily Mail put out?
doodlebug4
- 18 Dec 2013 15:01
- 34267 of 81564
I read the Guardian as well Stan!
"David Cameron calls Ed Balls a 'turkey' over anonymous Labour briefings
PM mocks shadow chancellor after speculation Ed Miliband may bring back Alistair Darling or promote a rising star."
Rowena Mason, political correspondent
theguardian.com, Wednesday 18 December 2013 13.33 GMT
MaxK
- 18 Dec 2013 15:03
- 34268 of 81564
Fred1new
- 18 Dec 2013 15:07
- 34269 of 81564
db
Who helps you to read?
8-)
goldfinger
- 18 Dec 2013 15:53
- 34270 of 81564
Will do cyners, cheers.
HEY Fred its worked, cheers, this chrome is a lot better than IE, wish Id changed way back.
goldfinger
- 18 Dec 2013 15:57
- 34271 of 81564
Wheres Hays????????????? Camoron took a right tonking at PMQs today, but even better were the labour back benches, whips really got the act together today, bringing up personal cases of poverty in their seats.
Camoron looked shocked and perplexed.
cynic
- 18 Dec 2013 15:58
- 34272 of 81564
i'll get you a job at google!
however, be aware that some programmes and stuff don't like chrome
goldfinger
- 18 Dec 2013 15:59
- 34273 of 81564
electionista @electionista
UK - YouGov/Sun poll: CON 33%, LAB 41%, LDEM 8%, UKIP 13%
goldfinger
- 18 Dec 2013 16:00
- 34274 of 81564
Cyners what happens then??? Does it go very slow and time out?.
cynic
- 18 Dec 2013 16:02
- 34275 of 81564
primarily slow, but it's hard to tell whether or not it's just the system ..... however, on occasion i have found that some things don't happily download via chrome, but perhaps that's when i'm in UAE
goldfinger
- 18 Dec 2013 16:18
- 34276 of 81564
Right cheers I did notice a site or two opening slowly last night.
Haystack
- 18 Dec 2013 16:35
- 34277 of 81564
Personal cases are a pointless thing to bring up at PMQs because they cannot be discussed and there is no evidence that the cases are even correct. Cameron easily won PMQs as usual.
We have the highest employment since 2009. Like it or not, the trend is towards large numbers of part time work. It is a function of technology deskilling jobs and supetceding jobs. There will never be full employment again under any party especially when there are too many people in the UK.
Fred1new
- 18 Dec 2013 17:23
- 34278 of 81564
electionista @electionista
UK - YuGov/Sun poll: CON 33%, LAB 41%, LDEM 8%, UKIP 13%
That is very interesting!!!!!! 8-) 8-)
=====
Hazyone,
If everybody was employed then unemployment would be zero.
Bloody marvellous.
But if all are working 1 hour a week then overall hours worked would be down.
Productivity is still down!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
UK GDP is down.
This to me a falsification of data, which appears to be becoming more and more prevalent in "research and publications" to-day.
(The latter especially where funding comes from Private Purses and when Public funding is being chased.)
cynic
- 18 Dec 2013 17:26
- 34279 of 81564
one more time ..... is the method(ology) the same today as it was a year ago? ..... if so, then to claim falsification just because you don't like the result or the picture painted is completely unjustified
Fred1new
- 18 Dec 2013 17:34
- 34280 of 81564
GF.
If you find Chrome slowing down, have a look at its settings and "blockers" in various areas. (popup . pages blocked etc.)
Click the three bars top right of window.
Go into settings.
But if you decide to change settings and not use to doing so, change one setting at a time.
If it has wrong effect reverse it.
Generally changing makes sense.
Also, have a look at advance settings at bottom of the page.
If you bugger it.
Remove Chrome through control panel and then download and reinstall. Doesn't take long and doesn't alter stored data.
=======
Chrome does appear to have runs when upgrades temporarily mess itself, but is a nice package.
Fred1new
- 18 Dec 2013 17:49
- 34281 of 81564
Cynic,
Presentation of data is a "falsification".
Somewhere, there should be figures for actual hours worked.
But explain related GDP. (Probably, an inadequate way of judging economic state.)
But what many are saying is that the "economic recovery" was delayed by Osborne's policies, partially due to his ineptitude and partially hoping for an economic boost at the time of the next GE. (I think he has mistimed it.)
Many who have similar opinions, believe in reductions, pruning and greater efficiency in the public service areas, as well as review of the Wealth Fare services, etc.. but this should thought out, done at a slower rate and not based on reactionary ideology for personal or party gain.
I think policies should be considered for a 25-30 year period for the whole country, not manipulated for political party advantage and dividing the nation into those who have more against those who have less and can have less.
cynic
- 18 Dec 2013 20:10
- 34282 of 81564
has there ever been figure showing hours worked etc etc?
perhaps you'ld like to dream up and vote for another way so that stats can be manipulated to suit you
i also don't agree at all with the second issue you raise .... i think harsh medicine and quickly was by far the best way with the wishy-washy alternative just leading to longer and longer misery for all
your 4th para is of course just piffle with no relationship to any kind of reality in the real world whatsoever
but as you can't be bothered to vote, you and those of similar ilk have ended up with the the parliament and gov't deserved