cynic
- 20 Oct 2007 12:12
rather than pick out individual stocks to trade, it can often be worthwhile to trade the indices themselves, especially in times of high volatility.
for those so inclined, i attach below charts for FTSE and FTSE 250, though one might equally be tempted to trade Dow or S&P, which is significantly broader in its coverage, or even NASDAQ
for ease of reading, i have attached 1 year and 3 month charts in each instance
HARRYCAT
- 13 Nov 2008 21:40
- 3462 of 21973
So the forecast for the FTSE tomorrow is....?
maddoctor
- 14 Nov 2008 10:40
- 3463 of 21973
re these huge rallies or falls - the only explanation I can come up with is that the computer trading programmes are just playing follow my leader
Stan
- 14 Nov 2008 10:47
- 3464 of 21973
Stay away?, you must be joking MD. Have a look at trading ISF on the up and XUKS for the down..I'll leave the timing to you -):
maddoctor
- 14 Nov 2008 10:50
- 3465 of 21973
stan , just been on the traders thread and seen one of the guys has had his biggest win ever so I have modified what I have said. It must be just me but these 100s of points moves in minutes just scares the hell out of me.
cynic
- 14 Nov 2008 10:51
- 3466 of 21973
timing is always everything .....one could have easily lost money on Dow last night as made it
KEAYDIAN
- 14 Nov 2008 11:01
- 3467 of 21973
Maddoctor, that was me.
maddoctor
- 14 Nov 2008 11:04
- 3468 of 21973
was not sure if you wanted your fame spread far and wide so left out name! :-)))
ThePublisher
- 14 Nov 2008 11:09
- 3469 of 21973
"re these huge rallies or falls - the only explanation I can come up with is that the computer trading programmes are just playing follow my leader"
A point I was trying to make on another thread that quickly died for apparent lack of interest.
I track the S&P 500 and it also went from about 5% down to 6.5% up.
In no way could humans made sales and purchases on five hundred different stocks over such a short period to effect that amount of change. And remember that whereas you can trade an index it trading price is determined by the value of the stocks it contains. So the computers that md is talking about are trading the 500 individual stocks - but seemingly making buys/sells based on the movement of the over-riding index.
Scarey stuff when you think that all this talk about recessions and oncoming gloom are dominated by the movement of indices like the S&P 500 - which is being driven by computers.
TP
KEAYDIAN
- 14 Nov 2008 11:14
- 3470 of 21973
lol MD.
maddoctor
- 14 Nov 2008 11:14
- 3471 of 21973
TP , glad somebody is thinking the same way - although I don,t think they(the computers) are trading all the stocks - I have been wondering if they somehow pick out all the stocks say trading UP and buy those or pick all the stocks trading down and pick those. I would love somebody to try and give an explanation.
Stan
- 14 Nov 2008 11:26
- 3472 of 21973
MD sometimes it can be irrelevant to "know", but just trade what you see in the short term.
maddoctor
- 14 Nov 2008 11:31
- 3473 of 21973
Stan , agree entirely with you but interested cos something seems to have changed over the last nine years although the Elliot boys are presently showing a graph of what happened in 1930 and huge moves were made then over days in the bear market but I do not think in the minutes we are seeing now.
Stan
- 14 Nov 2008 11:41
- 3474 of 21973
Yes agree with all that, but don't forget that that was then and this is now, all new territory.
Strawbs
- 14 Nov 2008 11:55
- 3475 of 21973
I suspect last nights rally was short covering ahead of the G20 meeting. I don't suppose they'll come up with anything, but many will want to lock in profits just in case. I read somewhere this week that trading volumes are down too, so any buying or selling pressure creates relatively big moves. Given recent volatility, many will be running close stop orders, so a sharp movement against the trend probably creates a "domino effect".
My guess is we'll probably restest the lows after the weekend.
In my opinion.
Strawbs.
P.S. Well done Keaydian
ThePublisher
- 14 Nov 2008 12:29
- 3476 of 21973
md,
Glad someone feels there may be a bit of truth in my theory.
You may find it interesting to take a quick look at
this thread
It drifted quite quickly but the theory I was suggesting was that it was the introduction of SETS that precipitated greater inter day volatility. And of course, going back to the pre SETS period we could not have had computer driven trading at all.
And no Stan, I am not saying it's more important than learning to trade in the present climate. I'm just postulating that these relatively dramatic swings in share prices may have ceased to provide a true picture of the world economy.
TP
cynic
- 14 Nov 2008 13:23
- 3477 of 21973
ok KD, which way are you jumping with Dow today? ...... Freddie's numbers horrid and Dow indicating -190
KEAYDIAN
- 14 Nov 2008 14:14
- 3478 of 21973
Cynic, not touching it for the time being.
cynic
- 14 Nov 2008 14:25
- 3479 of 21973
quite right too!
cynic
- 14 Nov 2008 15:22
- 3480 of 21973
DOW
just to highlight current volatility
13:23 indicating to open -190
14:25 much the same, though it had been better in the interim
15:20 -210 though it has been lower and also 150 points higher!
KEAYDIAN
- 14 Nov 2008 15:46
- 3481 of 21973
Just testing the Dow at the moment. I'll soon see if yesterday was a fluke before I give back all the winnings.