goldfinger
- 09 Jun 2005 12:25
Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).
Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.
cheers GF.
TANKER
- 07 Jan 2014 09:39
- 35184 of 81564
Beaten, abused, raped... the Pakistani brides as young as 14 who are forced to marry strangers and lured to wretched lives in Britain
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2534906/Beaten-abused-raped-brides-lured-wretched-lives-Britain.html#ixzz2phhXLppF
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
thought it was illegal to go to bed with a child
but it appears it does not include immigrants in the uk
stable
- 07 Jan 2014 09:48
- 35185 of 81564
Stan, oh ye of short memory, it was only an mbe awarded not the high reward given to Harolds coat maker.
MaxK
- 07 Jan 2014 09:57
- 35186 of 81564
aldwickk
- 07 Jan 2014 09:59
- 35187 of 81564
stable
If you read Stan and Fred's post's, overtime you will soon become unstable and wish you were back in the stable .... lol
goldfinger
- 07 Jan 2014 10:11
- 35188 of 81564
GANEX. Elland near Halifax Yorkshire.
Fred1new
- 07 Jan 2014 10:39
- 35189 of 81564
GF
"Its them that havent paid in that should have it taken away."
Which group are you thinking of?
Many don't earn "sufficient" to pay basic tax, but "put" a lot into society in different ways.
====
I would think that Basic Pensions should be based on "basic needs" and "justifiable" reward.
cynic
- 07 Jan 2014 10:54
- 35190 of 81564
Many don't earn "sufficient" to pay basic tax, but "put" a lot into society in different ways.
is that so ..... would you care to be (much) more specific?
cynic
- 07 Jan 2014 10:56
- 35191 of 81564
I would think that Basic Pensions should be based on "basic needs" and "justifiable" reward.
and the same applies here ...... would you care to be (much) more specific?
goldfinger
- 07 Jan 2014 11:10
- 35192 of 81564
Fred sorry yes ive phrased that wrong. It should read nobody should have it taken away, including ALL those who have paid in.
But the main point is that Osbourne is using these cuts as a political tool to draw out a response from labour. No way by cutting housing benefit for under 25s does it add up to £12.5 billion at the most it would be £2.5 billion but yet he says of this £25 billion 50% will come from welfare savings and 50% of that is savings as per above. So question is where does this other £10 million come from? given that Camoron as stated he will not cut winter fuel allowance bus pass etc.
see graph here........
cynic
- 07 Jan 2014 11:22
- 35193 of 81564
housing benefit is generally not that easy to come by, even though some assuredly work the system to get it, and i concur that it would only raise a minute amount - you can forget the headline figure
i think that a single-parent family (one child) gets a maximum of £700 pm, but no doubt someone can verify or correct that
sticky and i won't follow the red herring about landlords rentals!
Fred1new
- 07 Jan 2014 11:25
- 35194 of 81564
GF.
I thought that is what you intended.
The devil is in the detail.
-=-=
Manuel,
Suggest you play this short audio and consider your self inflicted blindness.
But, perhaps the obtusity of age may prevent you understanding it.
http://www.poets.org/viewmedia.php/prmMID/15377
cynic
- 07 Jan 2014 11:32
- 35195 of 81564
an even better idea for you ..... start answering questions instead of playing silly little games, pretending it's a variation on one of your cyber-chess antics
goldfinger
- 07 Jan 2014 11:34
- 35196 of 81564
Well Cyners we are both landlords and you must be aware like myself IDS is eventually doing away with payment direct to Landlords, it hasnt come into play here yet but I gather in most of the country it as.
Result.......... landlords are stopping people renting their property if they are on benefits....BUT........ the reason IDS is stopping direct payment to landlords is because bent landlords are not advising LAs when tenants move out and continue to get their rents and its costing councils so much to trace former tenants to get figures for recovery overpayments or no results at all.
To be honest Ive had no probs with welfare tenants worst culprits for me have been university students.
cynic
- 07 Jan 2014 11:51
- 35197 of 81564
i have a young couple on benefits, but as they pay me on DD and i know the parents well enough, i feel adequately protected
goldfinger
- 07 Jan 2014 11:59
- 35198 of 81564
This removal of direct housing benefit to the landlord is madness, I also hear under Universal credit IDS will be paying claimants monthly instead of fortnightly.!!!!!!!!! (cost savings, economies of scale)
Bad enough when your in work making budget meet for the month just think whats going to happen with the poor unemployed.
Total madness.
Fred1new
- 07 Jan 2014 12:04
- 35199 of 81564
GF,
University students!!!!!
AAAAAhhh I understand the more intelligent ones who can do runners.
cynic
- 07 Jan 2014 12:08
- 35200 of 81564
the idea of owning low rental accommodation would fill me with dread
as i have mentioned before, the landlord gets 6 weeks rental deposit, which is peanuts bearing in mind the downtime and mess that many tenants make - and that assumes all their other bills are paid up
goldfinger
- 07 Jan 2014 12:33
- 35201 of 81564
Fred....mad partys and neighbours complaining worst aspect.
Once had my whole central heating system plus boiler nicked. ........straight up.
Cyners 6 weeks rental deposit?. Most I ask for is a months bond.
goldfinger
- 07 Jan 2014 12:34
- 35202 of 81564
Labour opening up bigger lead after first four polls of year...........
electionista @electionista 4h
UK - YouGov/Sun poll: CON 32%, LAB 40%, LDEM 9%, UKIP 12%
Haystack
- 07 Jan 2014 12:37
- 35203 of 81564
Car sales highest since 2007