driver
- 23 Feb 2006 15:42
GOLD OIL, the London-based oil exploration company focused on the South American and Caribbean region, announces that in late December 2005, the Company received an Operator Certificate from PeruPetro that allows the Company to carry out seismic, drilling and development operations in Northwest Peru.
The Promotion Licence signed with PeruPetro on October 15, 2004 with PeruPetro for Block XI (now renamed Block XXI) onshore Sechura Basin has been converted to an Exploration and Production Licence. The Licence now goes to the Ministry of Energy and Mines for approval, which could be forthcoming anytime between February and May of this year 2006.
The terms of the E&P Licence commit the Company to either shoot 120 km of 2D seismic or drill a well in the first period of five over a seven year term. The remaining four periods require the Company to either drill a well or drop the acreage. The Licence is for a term of 30 years for oil and 40 years for gas, with a minimum royalty of 5% on wellhead production for the first 5000bopd (30 MMscfd for gas) rising to 20% if and when production reaches 100,000 bopd (600 MMscfd for gas).
Times Article:
Gold Oil is valued in the market at about �15m. That is so small that almost any good news must have a big impact on the share price.
What are the chances of that happening? Run by a former Burmah Oil director, Mike Burchell, Gold Oil will drill the first in a series of wells in the Sechura Basin in April. There will be surprise if it does not find gas, as another company, Olympic, has done just that in a similar formation nearby.
The secondary target, later in the year, will be oil, I gather. A couple of months ago, Petro Tech made a big oil find offshore in the Sechura Basin. The theory is the oil may have migrated up into Gold Oil�s block. Don�t ask me to explain the geology because I don�t speak Palaeozoic. But a decent oil find here would be a company-maker.
Gold Oil has enough cash to fund this year�s drilling programme. And it already has a deal in place to sell its gas to Mann Ferrostaal, a German company that is building an ammonia plant nearby. Getting all that for �15m seemed a bargain to me. But Gold Oil still has to find its gas.
GOLD OIL http://www.goldoilplc.com/index.html


Plectrum Web Site
http://www.plectrum.co.uk/splash_content.html
Wall Street Reporter Interview
http://www.wallstreetreporter.com/interview.php?id=17724&player=real
Growth Equities & Company Research Nov 2007
http://www.goldoilplc.com/docum/gecr_09Nov07_GoldOil_full.pdf
Gold Oil's Presentation On The 10/12/2007
http://www.proactiveinvestors.co.uk/pdf
Research Page Last updated Oct 23 2008
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=10572#lastread
6 AUG 2009 Operational and Reserves & Resources Update Colombia & Peru
http://moneyam.uk-wire.com/cgi-bin/articles/20090806084900H3062.html
explosive
- 03 Nov 2007 19:25
- 3532 of 4580
No sooner then I moan about these being suspended we're back in play and everything looks inorder. Positive news also I thought...
HARRYCAT
- 04 Nov 2007 16:18
- 3533 of 4580
I think you will find, Sharecruiser, that companies with holdings in the U.S. cannot also hold interests in companies in Cuba. Something to do with Castro & U.S. Presidents not being best buddies.
"'When opportunities in the US were identified by Minmet, then clearly the US and
Cuba could not be pursued by the same company" (as quoted by G. Moore of GOO).
ShareCruiser
- 05 Nov 2007 12:33
- 3535 of 4580
The fog lifts.
mcgrath1958
- 05 Nov 2007 13:59
- 3536 of 4580
Doing pretty well today considering the blood bath out there in the markets!
driver
- 05 Nov 2007 16:30
- 3537 of 4580
From the dark side.
"Shearlock's Small Cap Stock Picks"
Gold Oil winner from Minmet deal
The untangling of Gold Oil’s cross-shareholding with Minmet – both of whose shares have been tipped here in the past – looks to favour the former at the expense of the latter. By selling a big chunk of its holding in Minmet to two of the company’s directors at more than twice today’s share price, Gold Oil gets £2.6 million cash, with the prospect of a further £1.4 million once Minmet’s residual holding of Gold Oil shares is placed. The initial slug of cash should be enough to fund at least four more wells in Peru, where the company continues to work up new targets following the disappointment of last year.
In addition, Gold Oil gets full control of exploration acreage in Cuba and Venezuela, which was formerly part of a joint venture with Minmet.
For its part, Minmet gets to receive around £700,000 cash from the placing of Gold Oil’s remaining holding in the company. Together with the abandonment of the Cuba and Venezuela assets, it is looking at a loss of at least £2.4 million. This, however, will be guaranteed by a company owned by its two controlling directors.
From the moment at which its new boys decided to take Minmet into the US, the company had little option but to exit its Cuban venture. But it has still come out badly from the exercise. Gold Oil (recommended here three years ago at 6.88p, and now 7.3p) remains a hold on the prospects for its Peruvian acreage; Minmet is also worth keeping (now 8.6p compared with a recommendation level here of 12p in August this year) on the basis that its new boys now have a massive incentive to get the share price better."
ShareCruiser
- 06 Nov 2007 13:40
- 3538 of 4580
So the split was politically motivated. If it wasn't for that they would have stayed together.
Now they are apart they lose synergies but maybe one of them wil actually benefit but that wasn't their view before politics forced the situation.
My take is it's negative.
cynic
- 06 Nov 2007 14:16
- 3539 of 4580
i agree .... how can it not be, if the "talks" were to the benefit of both parties and have now failed
cynic
- 06 Nov 2007 15:15
- 3541 of 4580
don't know guv ..... only have 1/3 norm stake here, so not a big deal for me
willfagg
- 07 Nov 2007 12:09
- 3542 of 4580
I begin to wonder why there was a necessity to suspend the shares . After just a few days, and the dust having settled ,the price has gone enowhere and the market seems to be saying "so what" business as usual with the price languishing sub 7p.Long time holder starting to get weary of lack of results.
HARRYCAT
- 07 Nov 2007 13:16
- 3543 of 4580
The usual frenzy on the hype, then sp settling back to +/- 6p. Only good drilling news will help this stock now, imo.
It is my understanding the suspension came about because both companies were not able to release their news at the same time. It looks like GOO were ready, but feared a press leak & therefore suspended trading.
fatgreek
- 07 Nov 2007 21:32
- 3544 of 4580
Halifax are showing the SP as 8.1p
janetbennison
- 07 Nov 2007 21:35
- 3545 of 4580
I have just noticed the price on money am at .0810p It must be correct. I wonder why the price has gone up. Does anyone have any ideas?
janetbennison
- 07 Nov 2007 22:01
- 3546 of 4580
this price is showing on the london stock exchange and on the teletext share page so it must be correct.
lizard
- 07 Nov 2007 22:34
- 3547 of 4580
wouldnt get your hopes up too much!- think its lse problems!.
fatgreek
- 08 Nov 2007 17:50
- 3550 of 4580
My screen shows us at 7.13 either way good recovery and should mean we are on top form for a blue start imo