Mabel - hard to have faith
- how many people are led blindly - to chemotherapy
The Fred Hutchinson Cancer Institute has published research showing that
- The extremely aggressive therapy, which kills both cancerous and healthy cells indiscriminately, can
- cause healthy cells to secrete a protein
- that sustains...... tumor growth.... and
- resistance.... to further treatment.
http://www.nydailynews.com/life-style/health/shock-study-chemotherapy-backfire-cancer-worse-triggering-tumor-growth-article-1.1129897#ixzz2Z3wBzcHo
It's actually been known sice the 70's - but even so - when a recent study shows it.....
- why are they still giving people something that - sustains the cancer
- and....makes it more agressive and treatment resistant
.....than you began with ?????
Strange - they keep pushing....mammograms...too
John W. Gofman, M.D., Ph.D., an authority on the health effects of ionizing radiation, spent 30 years studying the effects of low-dose radiation on humans. He estimates that
- 75% of breast cancer
- could be prevented by avoiding or minimizing
- exposure to the ionizing radiation from......
- mammography,........ X rays, and other medical sources.
Does he know his onions...on the subject
John William Gofman is
- Professor Emeritus of Molecular and Cell Biology in the University of California at Berkeley,
- and Lecturer at the Department of Medicine, University of California School of Medicine at San Francisco.
He is the author of several books and
- more than a hundred....... scientific papers in peer-review journals
in the fields of nuclear / physical chemistry, coronary heart disease, ultracentrifugal analysis of the serum lipoproteins, the relationship of human chromosomes to cancer, and the biological effects of radiation, with especial reference to causation of cancer and hereditary injury.
Re Mammograms
British Journal Of radiology on.. pubmed.gov
- low energy X-rays
- as used in .....mammography are approximately..... four times
- but possibly as much .....as six times
- more effective in....... causing mutational damage (than higher energy X-rays)
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16498030
And.....after they have finished using "more cancer causing low energy" radiation for mamograms
- causing up to 75% ...of breast cancers
When they.....find the breast cancer
an independent review set up...by the government
(following years of scientific controversy surrounding the NHS programme).
Found...
4,000 women will undergo .......unnecessary treatment, including
- surgery,
- radiotherapy
- and chemotherapy,
for a cancer
- they would not otherwise have known about and....
- which would have done them......***** no harm in their lifetime*****.
Some breast cancers are so tiny and slow growing that they would....
- never be a threat...... to a woman's health,
the review says.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2012/oct/30/breast-cancer-screenings-damaging-women
Conclusion
So in the light of all the above......why do they keep batting on regardless
- using "more cancer causing" low energy radiation...for mamograms
- & doing things that cause 75% of breast cancers (Per Dr Gofman)
- treating women with - radiation/surgery/chemo......who would never have any threat to their health ....in their lifetime...had they done nothing
- and....when giving chemo....knowingly doing so....even tho' the Fred Hutchinson Cancer institute.....has proven
- it causes the body to release a protein that.....actually sustains the tumour
- and makes it more....treatment resistant .
Answer ?
- sadly..... a simple one
- the same reason the Red Cross suppresses Jim Humbles....malaria cure
(there would otherwise be millions of African babies - surviving)
ie...
If they didn't keep causing cancer and supressing the cure
- Trillions in lost profits
- &....billion more people on the planet
In the style of Bones as he used to say to Captain Kirk on Star Trek
"It's just Eugenics Jim....but not as we know it"