EWRobson
- 09 Sep 2004 19:13
Header updated on 24th April 2008
Market has been looking for an announcement re a licensing deal for Cetilistat, the obesity drug; instead it has been hit with the withdrawal of Renzapride, colonitis drug, following an unauspicious performance at Phase III. Folloiwng has been edited to reflect the situation
Alizyme is a speciality biopharmaceutical company that has been developing product categories for inflammatory gastrointestinal disorders, obesity and supportive cancer care . It is currently trading at a five year low of around 27p with a market cap. of around 60m. Prudential owned a near 20% stake (reduced in sale today?) There was good institutional taku-up of a placing in March rasing 10m at 50p; no wonder there has been "angry" selling. The directors hold 3.34million shares or about 1.7% of the equity (of which Tim McCarthy, CEO has 1.1million); thus, after some 10 years of development effort, they must be comletely focused on the success of the company and multiplying the value of their holdings (but with real doubts about their marketing competence). Alizyme had previously raised capital sums in the past three years at around 70p and 100p so it was somewhat surprising to see the share fall through its 70p support level. Clearly one reason is the current disaffection with the biopharm. market. Another has to be disappointment for the failure of the CEO, Tim McCarthy, to deliver on his expectation that 2007 would be a transformative year. The key question is whether 2008 will be that year and when is it likely to happen? The following points are relevant:
1. Alizyme did sign one deal in late-2007: with Prometheus Labs (U.S.) for the Colal-Pred, at a potential market of $250m, the smallest potential of their four products. Prometheus pay $2.5m up-front with a total of $15m payable upon future development milestones. They are responsible for all US development costs and will pay Alizyme undisclosed royalty rates which will increase with net sales. The deal was followed by a Japanese licensing agreement (which also gave Alizymen access to additional potential drug candidates).
2. This perhaps sets a precedent for subsequent deals for their other products. Cetistat (obesity) has an estimated potential of $1 billion p.a. sales and ATL-104 (mucositis) has a potential of $500m sales. The U.S. FDA has encouraged AZM to also launch a Phase III exercise for Cetistat for all diabetes sufferer because of positive II results for diabetes sufferers who also suffer from obesity.
3. Whilst the development programmes for the other drugs are on-going and appear to be satisfactorily funded from present resources, this is not the case for Cetilistat. The "Product and Company Update statement" (7th Jan 2008) says that 'the Phase III development programme is now ready to commence following the conclusion of a commercial deal'. So, perhaps for the first time, the development programme would be delayed if there was not a funding deal in either the U.S. or Europe. The reason for the sp shooting to nearly 200p in 2004 was the signing of a deal with Takada of Japan for some $50M development funding.
In response to a question at the Conference to report the Renzapride fiasco, McCarthy seemed pleased that there were six potential bidders for Cetilistat; however, that implies any announcement is some time away. When it comes, however, taking a line from the Takada and Prometheus deals it would seem likely that there would be of the order of $100m funding to support development. Of course, the major cash flow will be from licensing of actual sales. The analysts do their own discounted cash flow exercises; those seen tend to dwarf current valuations of the company.
There is not a strong argument for jumping in unless and until the sp establishes a baseline. Given the peaks in the sp, the time will probably come when there will be a very significant jump. An alternative scenario, is that management continue to rpove their level of incompetence and a buy-our results. Clearly the strength of the company is in their biochemists.
Eric

neil777
- 15 May 2007 08:32
- 359 of 718
Usually Eric, although the neck line can be sloped i think.
Fred i thought you were suggesting that a head and shoulders were forming, my mistake.
Ludlow Castle
- 19 May 2007 10:18
- 360 of 718
A comment by Alizyme's CEO in the Annual Report & Accounts 2006, page 13 (published last week) as follows:
"I am confident that 2007 will see the successful conclusion of a number of transforming deals for Alizyme, generating a superior return for our long-standing and loyal shareholders".
EWRobson
- 21 May 2007 20:17
- 361 of 718
Ludlow That comment was in the Preliminary Results published on 19th February. The market reacted positively to the change of CEO, the appointment of Novaquest and the general positive progress. I commented above that the falling price was driven by a large number of relatively small AT trades and that the overall balance of buying and selling was not that skewed. Today had some quite heavy selling late in the day which certainly justified the additional fall. I have suspected for some time that AZM is susceptible to trading action in either direction - a possible reason is that you do not have the normal benchmarks of pe ratio, ROE etc. If there was any cange in company prospects causing the price fall then a statement would be called for. So it is either investors becoming impatient or, more likely, traders seeing an opportunity for a quick buck. Any views?
Eric
Kivver
- 22 May 2007 12:07
- 362 of 718
The mountain peaks seem to be getting lower!
EWRobson
- 22 May 2007 12:58
- 363 of 718
Kivver. I really only have a passing interest in charts but it does look as though we are heading for a double bottom. Prefer double boobs myself. One interesting feature of the AZM chart is that it sets a trend and then stays that way for some time. In other words, it tends not to operate within channels with defined highs and lows. The reason is I believe, as my comments above, that there are no real yardsticks to measure what the value is. You can say the order of what the potential is if they achieve the deal(s)for which they are looking. I suspect that the market has not taken on board the time to negotiate an acceptable deal. Thus the optimism in Ludlow's post refers to 2007 - this is saying that we should do the deal in a year but it may not be much less than that. My conclusion would be that there will be a sustained upward run from the third quarter - unless some problem emerges.
Eric
Fred1new
- 22 May 2007 15:28
- 364 of 718
A treble bottom at about 70p is more likely. Might take a punt at that level.
Nar1
- 23 May 2007 08:34
- 365 of 718
I concur 70p is the next level
neil777
- 23 May 2007 08:57
- 366 of 718
Cant see it falling to much further, total gift, imo.
Nar1
- 23 May 2007 09:17
- 367 of 718
MACD and MA all negative all pointing down IMO
Kivver
- 23 May 2007 09:44
- 368 of 718
macd and ma is miles above my head, if they strike a deal tomorrow that will mean nothing until they do perhaps it matters.
neil777
- 23 May 2007 10:30
- 369 of 718
The RSI is looking very oversold, again it may fall a little more but this share has too much potential Re, deals this year , it must be looking very attractive to investers at current price.
Also remember, the CEO has stuck his neck out suggesting deals should come this year, if so 2+ must be on the radar.
Nar1
- 23 May 2007 12:18
- 370 of 718
Please find attached graph of MACD and MA
Any thoughts anyone?
coming down this should help why I am saying this.
neil777
- 23 May 2007 17:18
- 371 of 718
5,000,000 buy @17:05pm.
I did say it was very attractive at this level, hopefully now onwards and upwards!
Fred1new
- 23 May 2007 19:39
- 372 of 718
Still wouldn't touch it.
If the trend changes which it might if that volume is true then I would still watch for a day of buying with price rising and volume rising.
Good luck if you. Haven't got a spare cash at the moment.
Fred1new
- 23 May 2007 19:41
- 373 of 718
ps. The 10,20 and 50 day moving average are still downwardly pointing.
Ludlow Castle
- 24 May 2007 19:10
- 374 of 718
The chart looks oversold on a technical basis, and in the context of recent and anticipated value-enhancing news.
The FDA's advisory committee meet to consider an application for Sanofi's Zimulti (Acomplia) on 13th June, the recommendation from which will be made public; and the FDA will make a final decision on that recommendation in July, which will also be made public. This will clarify the competitive position in the US relative to what is known about Alizyme's Cetilistat, and enable a partner to conclude a deal for Cetilistat.
AZM could get $650m in upfront and milestone payments for Cetilistat, starting in 2007, plus double digit royalties on sales.
Takeda are expected to complete Phase 2 Cetilistat in Japan during 2007 and (if it is successful) will give Alizyme another milestone payment before commencing Phase 3.
Renzapride is near the end of Phase 3 and has just secured further patent protection, so is ripe for a deal in 2007/08. It could be worth more than Cetilistat as the market for IBS is poorly served and Novartis's Zelnorm has been pulled leaving Aizyme's Renzapride the only drug left standing in c-IBS.
COLAL-PRED is approaching the end of Phase 3 and will be partnered either before the results or after (if successful).
Note, Alizyme will get even better terms for Renzapride and COLAL-PRED based on the Phase 3 data; so potentially expect some terms even better than for Cetilistat.
Alizyme should soon be basking in substantial upfront and milestone payments, from their three lead drugs.
Obviously, Alizyme is also ripe for a take-over.
EWRobson
- 26 May 2007 21:28
- 375 of 718
Very good and informative post Ludlow Castle. Press comment, inclduing Shares, has always put focus on Cetilistat. It is easy to size the obesity market and the Takada deal gives a good idea of the value. But its right to say that thet there are three drugs in the window for deals.
Regarding the charts, not an expert but it is clear that momentum is changing. This could be an excellent time to buy in.
Eric
steveo
- 29 May 2007 13:28
- 376 of 718
Good call Ludlow & EW
canary9
- 29 May 2007 20:01
- 377 of 718
Eric, back in again today after selling at 1.20p, I was hoping for 80p again, but didn't think it would get there!!!
Fred1new
- 29 May 2007 20:23
- 378 of 718
Yes, if it is ramped enough.