Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

Bin Ladin is dead     

mitzy - 02 May 2011 07:52

President Obama says its great news for peace and democracy.

mitzy - 03 May 2011 20:42 - 36 of 140

His wife shot in the leg and not terminal.

TANKER - 04 May 2011 08:15 - 37 of 140

he now would no there is no god

Fred1new - 04 May 2011 08:27 - 38 of 140

I am glad that summary justice is being applauded in the USA, Britain and Syria.

Perhaps we need another referendum to legalise it in this country.

Dil - 04 May 2011 08:56 - 39 of 140

Its not being applauded Fred its being cheered from the rooftops all over the western world and that fact that he was unarmed doesn't worry me one iota.

Good riddance to him.

Fred1new - 04 May 2011 09:17 - 40 of 140

Dil,

I think it is a good example for others.

However, I would watch that neighbour of yours, he has just bought a new twelve bore.

Also, the Syrians only arrested and torture "terrorists" who disagree with them.

(I need some of their power.)

In The Land of the B - 04 May 2011 09:56 - 41 of 140

Instead of shooting him, freddie would have been given him an ASBO

Bernard M - 04 May 2011 09:58 - 42 of 140

Or a council house in Peckham

aldwickk - 04 May 2011 10:25 - 43 of 140

They should have flown Bin Laden to the uk and torture him by forcing him to read all of Fred's post's .

In The Land of the B - 04 May 2011 11:37 - 44 of 140

"forcing him to read all of Fred's post's "

"Cruel and unusual punishment" is against the US constitution.

They don't have eight bedroom houses in Peckham for all his wives and kids so they'd have given him a pad in Kensington and Chelsea plus all the benefits/

Bernard M - 04 May 2011 13:45 - 45 of 140

Dil - 04 May 2011 14:15 - 46 of 140

Difference is Fred I've not blown up thousands of my neighbours mates and been hiding from him for ten years so he has no argument with me.

Bernard M - 04 May 2011 14:25 - 47 of 140



7 bedroom terraced house for sale in Peckham, London SE15
Like this property?


1,050,000

Fred1new - 04 May 2011 19:42 - 48 of 140

Dil,

In that Bush and Blair are responsible for the deaths of over 100,000
Iraqis by "collateral" damage, and many think they are responsible for war crimes you would not be offended by the injudicial "killing" or "murder" of them even?

Even if they were unarmed?

I am not sad that he is dead, but I think after all the crowing is over, that, probably, more harm has been done by the way in which it has be achieved.

mitzy - 04 May 2011 20:09 - 49 of 140

WH says he is 100% dead.

In The Land of the B - 04 May 2011 21:21 - 50 of 140

Must be 100% dead now even the sharks have vomited up his remains.

Dil - 05 May 2011 00:06 - 51 of 140

Fred , know where your coming from but I believe right or wrong that however he was killed and whatever the circumstances the world is now a better place without him.

aldwickk - 05 May 2011 08:05 - 52 of 140

But no safer. Thanks to Labour with their secret open door immigration policy the enemy's of our Western way of life are now living amongst us.

mitzy - 05 May 2011 10:12 - 53 of 140

He will not walk on this earth again.

aldwickk - 05 May 2011 10:19 - 54 of 140

But those walking behind him will

cynic - 05 May 2011 10:32 - 55 of 140

reality check needed here

fred - on the very reasonably assumption that BL is dead, do you think that his bodyguards would have allowed him to be taken alive? ...... do you think BL would have meekly held up his hands in surrender when politely requested to do so? ..... do you think that even in a drugged state (say) that BL could have been whisked away? ..... do you think that that would actually have been a "better" solution and that his follwers would merely have muttered, "oh dear! guess the game's up now"?

of course the removal of BL will not destroy al qaeda, and indeed for a while, the world may be a somewhat more dangerous place for obvious reasons ..... however, there can be no denying (except perhaps by fred) that the removal of BM and especially the capture of huge amounts of information of all kinds will weaken al qaeda substantially

what "we" do about that vipers-nest of pakistan is another matter - not play them cricket would be a good start!
Register now or login to post to this thread.