goldfinger
- 09 Jun 2005 12:25
Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).
Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.
cheers GF.
cynic
- 03 Feb 2014 13:53
- 36199 of 81564
that has always been the case, but for sure it will primarily refer to the aggressive schemes, and just possibly to people who set themselves up as a company but who really only have one employer/client or similar and are thus not truly trading or even investment companies
goldfinger
- 03 Feb 2014 14:42
- 36200 of 81564
Cyners do you do the roof and building repairs or do you leave it to your tennant to pay for it?
Just phoned a pal and hes like me he pays for all outer building repairs, landlord insurance like me aswel.
cynic
- 03 Feb 2014 14:52
- 36201 of 81564
i would have thought that structural repairs - eg the roof - would probably fall into my domain, though i'm not entirely certain - and both my props have new roofs anyway
however, window frames and the like tend to be for the tenant .... all these things are usually comprehensively covered in the lease whether FRI or AST
even if any repairs are for the tenants' account, simple internal cosmetic stuff aside, i would want to control who was carrying out those repairs to minimise the chance of cowboys
Haystack
- 03 Feb 2014 15:00
- 36202 of 81564
They are probably short term tennbancies. Council tennant's have security of tenure and tend to be long term tennant's. I would prefer them to be treated as leaseholders. In fact I would bring back security of tenure to most tennants
goldfinger
- 03 Feb 2014 15:14
- 36203 of 81564
All mine are Ordinary Assured Tenancies, Part Furnished and long term tenants in the main.
But Hays as got me thinking Im missing a trick here.
Going to have to look further into this.
cynic
- 03 Feb 2014 15:18
- 36204 of 81564
none of mine are furnished ..... at least my posh site has a very long term AAA client in the commercial section, and an overseas banker in the residential
Fred1new
- 03 Feb 2014 15:52
- 36205 of 81564
T Yeo,
Deselected.
Interesting, can I suggest a few more.
Mind with Pickle's physique we can afford to wait.
cynic
- 03 Feb 2014 20:20
- 36206 of 81564
yahoo tell us "Beginning 21 March 2014, we will be providing our services from a single European entity based in Ireland."
now why would that be?
MaxK
- 03 Feb 2014 21:38
- 36207 of 81564
Tax, non payment of same, what else?
cynic
- 03 Feb 2014 21:42
- 36208 of 81564
"really?" he said in total astonishment
MaxK
- 03 Feb 2014 21:44
- 36209 of 81564
I know, shocked and stunned here!
MaxK
- 04 Feb 2014 08:46
- 36210 of 81564
MaxK
- 04 Feb 2014 09:44
- 36211 of 81564
Haystack
- 04 Feb 2014 10:13
- 36212 of 81564
Update - Labour lead at 5
by YouGov in Politics
Tue February 4, 2014 6 a.m. GMT
Latest YouGov / The Sun results 3rd February - Con 33%, Lab 38%, LD 11%, UKIP 11%; APP -25
MaxK
- 04 Feb 2014 10:30
- 36214 of 81564
It's duff up Gove day.
MaxK
- 04 Feb 2014 10:32
- 36215 of 81564
David Cameron’s choice – to stand firm, or dance to Ukip’s tune
By Benedict Brogan Politics Last updated: February 3rd, 2014
long excuse for cameroons failings:
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/benedictbrogan/100257895/david-camerons-choice-to-stand-firm-or-dance-to-ukips-tune/
Fred1new
- 04 Feb 2014 12:42
- 36216 of 81564
Which one is leading the conners party?.
Which has the best pedigree to do so?
What are the latest torrid U-turns?
Manuel and Haze should get 3 out of 3 right.
aldwickk
- 04 Feb 2014 16:14
- 36217 of 81564
cynic
- 04 Feb 2014 16:27
- 36218 of 81564
The extent of corruption in Europe is "breathtaking" and it costs the EU economy at least 120bn euros (£99bn) annually, the European Commission says.
nothing new there then, for we all were fully aware of that for years
what about the bloated gravy train that keeps getting fatter and fatter and over which the voters have no control whatsoever?